Skip to main content

ReViz: A Tool for Automatically Generating Citation Graphs and Variants

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Libraries at Times of Massive Societal Transition (ICADL 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12504))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1022 Accesses

Abstract

A systematic literature review provides an overview of multiple scientific publications in an area of research and visualizations of the data of the systematic review enable further in-depth analyses. The creation of such a review and its visualizations is a very time- and labor-intensive process. For this reason, we propose a tool for automatically generating visualizations for systematic reviews. Using this tool, the citations between the included articles can be depicted in a citation graph. However, because the clearness of the information contained in the citation graph is highly dependent on the number of included publications, several strategies are implemented in order to reduce the complexity of the graph without loosing (much) information. The generated graphs and developed strategies are evaluated using different instruments, including an user survey, in which they are rated positively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In addition to the use of Parsifal and the export of data from it, it is also possible to generate a citation graph without creating a systematic review, using a Bibtex file and the referenced publications as PDF documents (local files or remotely accessible via urls) as input. However, the generation of a flow chart is only possible using Parsifal. Since this requires the use of a fork, the modified code of Parsifal is also available in the form of a docker container at https://github.com/l-hartung/parsifal/.

  2. 2.

    We will provide the details in a forthcoming extended paper.

References

  1. Al-Zubidy, A., Carver, J.C., Hale, D.P., Hassler, E.E.: Vision for SLR tooling infrastructure: prioritizing value-added requirements. Inf. Softw. Technol. 91, 72–81 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Babačić, H., Mehta, A., Merkel, O., Schoser, B.: CRISPR-cas gene-editing as plausible treatment of neuromuscular and nucleotide-repeat-expansion diseases: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 14(2), e0212198 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Badawi, H.F., Laamarti, F., El Saddik, A.: ISO/IEEE 11073 personal health device (X73-PHD) standards compliant systems: a systematic literature review. IEEE Access 7, 3062–3073 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonidia, R., Rodrigues, L.A.L., Avila-Santos, A.P., Sanches, D., Brancher, J.: Computational intelligence in sports: a systematic literature review. Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2018, 3 426 178:1–3 426 178:13 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Börner, K., Polley, D.E.: Visual Insights: A Practical Guide to Making Sense of Data. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bornmann, L., Mutz, R.: Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66(11), 2215–2222 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57(3), 359–377 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, F., Lui, A.M., Martinelli, S.M.: A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Med. Educ. 51(6), 585–597 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Covidence Team: Covidence. https://www.covidence.org

  10. De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., Tummers, L.: Innovation in the public sector: a systematic review and future research agenda. Public Adm. 94(1), 146–166 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. DiBiase, D., MacEachren, A., Krygier, J., Reeves, C.: Animation and the role of map design in scientific visualization. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 19, 201–214 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elmqvist, N., Tsigas, P.: CiteWiz: a tool for the visualization of scientific citation networks. Inf. Vis. 6(3), 215–232 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Finnerup, N.B., et al.: Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 14(2), 162–173 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khan, K.S., Ter Riet, G., Glanville, J., Sowden, A.J., Kleijnen, J. et al.: Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for carrying out or commissioning reviews. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, no. CRD Report 4, 2nd edn. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Khan, K.U., Nawaz, W., Lee, Y.-K.: Set-based approximate approach for lossless graph summarization. Computing 97(12), 1185–1207 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele UK Keele Univ. 33(2004), 1–26 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kubben, P.L., ter Meulen, K.J., Schijns, O.E., ter Laak-Poort, M.P., van Overbeeke, J.J., van Santbrink, H.: Intraoperative MRI-guided resection of glioblastoma multiforme: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 12(11), 1062–1070 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, J., Hua, C., Pan, J., Han, B., Tang, X.: Piezosurgery vs conventional rotary instrument in the third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Dent. Sci. 13(4), 342–349 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, X., Tian, Y., He, Q., Lee, W.-C., McPherson, J.: Distributed graph summarization. In: CIKM, Shanghai, China (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marshall, C., Brereton, P.: Tools to support systematic literature reviews in software engineering: a mapping study. In: International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 296–299, October 2013

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marshall, C., Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.: Tools to support systematic reviews in software engineering: a cross-domain survey using semi-structured interviews. In: EASE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., The PRISMA Group: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 151(4), 264–269 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Parsifal Ltd.: Parsifal. https://parsif.al/

  24. Rosenthal, F., Groppe, S.: Purposeful searching for citations of scholarly publications. Open J. Inf. Syst. (OJIS) 4(1), 27–48 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shalaby, M., Emile, S., Elfeki, H., Sakr, A., Wexner, S.D., Sileri, P.: Systematic review of endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy as salvage treatment for rectal anastomotic leakage. BJS Open 3(2), 153–160 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Soheilirad, S., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Nilashi, M., Zakuan, N.: Application of data envelopment analysis models in supply chain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 271(2), 915–969 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. The Cochrane Collaboration: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (2011). http://handbook.cochrane.org

  28. The Cochrane Collaboration: Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer Program], version 5.3 ed. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thomas, J., Graziosi, S., Brunton, J.: Eppi-reviewer. http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=2914

  30. van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L.: Software survey: vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2), 523–538 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L.: CitNetExplorer: a new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks. J. Inf. 8(4), 802–823 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Whiting, P.F., et al.: Cannabinoids for medical use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 313(24), 2456–2473 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., Smolander, K.: Where is current research on blockchain technology? — a systematic review. PLoS ONE 11(10), e0163477 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao, D., Strotmann, A.: Analysis and visualization of citation networks. Synth. Lect. Inf. Concepts Retr. Serv. 7(1), 1–207 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Groppe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Groppe, S., Hartung, L. (2020). ReViz: A Tool for Automatically Generating Citation Graphs and Variants. In: Ishita, E., Pang, N.L.S., Zhou, L. (eds) Digital Libraries at Times of Massive Societal Transition. ICADL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12504. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64452-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64452-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64451-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64452-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics