Abstract
A systematic literature review provides an overview of multiple scientific publications in an area of research and visualizations of the data of the systematic review enable further in-depth analyses. The creation of such a review and its visualizations is a very time- and labor-intensive process. For this reason, we propose a tool for automatically generating visualizations for systematic reviews. Using this tool, the citations between the included articles can be depicted in a citation graph. However, because the clearness of the information contained in the citation graph is highly dependent on the number of included publications, several strategies are implemented in order to reduce the complexity of the graph without loosing (much) information. The generated graphs and developed strategies are evaluated using different instruments, including an user survey, in which they are rated positively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In addition to the use of Parsifal and the export of data from it, it is also possible to generate a citation graph without creating a systematic review, using a Bibtex file and the referenced publications as PDF documents (local files or remotely accessible via urls) as input. However, the generation of a flow chart is only possible using Parsifal. Since this requires the use of a fork, the modified code of Parsifal is also available in the form of a docker container at https://github.com/l-hartung/parsifal/.
- 2.
We will provide the details in a forthcoming extended paper.
References
Al-Zubidy, A., Carver, J.C., Hale, D.P., Hassler, E.E.: Vision for SLR tooling infrastructure: prioritizing value-added requirements. Inf. Softw. Technol. 91, 72–81 (2017)
Babačić, H., Mehta, A., Merkel, O., Schoser, B.: CRISPR-cas gene-editing as plausible treatment of neuromuscular and nucleotide-repeat-expansion diseases: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 14(2), e0212198 (2019)
Badawi, H.F., Laamarti, F., El Saddik, A.: ISO/IEEE 11073 personal health device (X73-PHD) standards compliant systems: a systematic literature review. IEEE Access 7, 3062–3073 (2019)
Bonidia, R., Rodrigues, L.A.L., Avila-Santos, A.P., Sanches, D., Brancher, J.: Computational intelligence in sports: a systematic literature review. Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2018, 3 426 178:1–3 426 178:13 (2018)
Börner, K., Polley, D.E.: Visual Insights: A Practical Guide to Making Sense of Data. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R.: Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66(11), 2215–2222 (2015)
Chen, C.: CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57(3), 359–377 (2006)
Chen, F., Lui, A.M., Martinelli, S.M.: A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Med. Educ. 51(6), 585–597 (2017)
Covidence Team: Covidence. https://www.covidence.org
De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., Tummers, L.: Innovation in the public sector: a systematic review and future research agenda. Public Adm. 94(1), 146–166 (2016)
DiBiase, D., MacEachren, A., Krygier, J., Reeves, C.: Animation and the role of map design in scientific visualization. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 19, 201–214 (1992)
Elmqvist, N., Tsigas, P.: CiteWiz: a tool for the visualization of scientific citation networks. Inf. Vis. 6(3), 215–232 (2007)
Finnerup, N.B., et al.: Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 14(2), 162–173 (2015)
Khan, K.S., Ter Riet, G., Glanville, J., Sowden, A.J., Kleijnen, J. et al.: Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for carrying out or commissioning reviews. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, no. CRD Report 4, 2nd edn. (2001)
Khan, K.U., Nawaz, W., Lee, Y.-K.: Set-based approximate approach for lossless graph summarization. Computing 97(12), 1185–1207 (2015)
Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele UK Keele Univ. 33(2004), 1–26 (2004)
Kubben, P.L., ter Meulen, K.J., Schijns, O.E., ter Laak-Poort, M.P., van Overbeeke, J.J., van Santbrink, H.: Intraoperative MRI-guided resection of glioblastoma multiforme: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 12(11), 1062–1070 (2011)
Liu, J., Hua, C., Pan, J., Han, B., Tang, X.: Piezosurgery vs conventional rotary instrument in the third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Dent. Sci. 13(4), 342–349 (2018)
Liu, X., Tian, Y., He, Q., Lee, W.-C., McPherson, J.: Distributed graph summarization. In: CIKM, Shanghai, China (2014)
Marshall, C., Brereton, P.: Tools to support systematic literature reviews in software engineering: a mapping study. In: International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 296–299, October 2013
Marshall, C., Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.: Tools to support systematic reviews in software engineering: a cross-domain survey using semi-structured interviews. In: EASE (2015)
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., The PRISMA Group: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 151(4), 264–269 (2009)
Parsifal Ltd.: Parsifal. https://parsif.al/
Rosenthal, F., Groppe, S.: Purposeful searching for citations of scholarly publications. Open J. Inf. Syst. (OJIS) 4(1), 27–48 (2017)
Shalaby, M., Emile, S., Elfeki, H., Sakr, A., Wexner, S.D., Sileri, P.: Systematic review of endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy as salvage treatment for rectal anastomotic leakage. BJS Open 3(2), 153–160 (2018)
Soheilirad, S., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Nilashi, M., Zakuan, N.: Application of data envelopment analysis models in supply chain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 271(2), 915–969 (2018)
The Cochrane Collaboration: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (2011). http://handbook.cochrane.org
The Cochrane Collaboration: Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer Program], version 5.3 ed. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen (2014)
Thomas, J., Graziosi, S., Brunton, J.: Eppi-reviewer. http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=2914
van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L.: Software survey: vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2), 523–538 (2010)
van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L.: CitNetExplorer: a new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks. J. Inf. 8(4), 802–823 (2014)
Whiting, P.F., et al.: Cannabinoids for medical use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 313(24), 2456–2473 (2015)
Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., Smolander, K.: Where is current research on blockchain technology? — a systematic review. PLoS ONE 11(10), e0163477 (2016)
Zhao, D., Strotmann, A.: Analysis and visualization of citation networks. Synth. Lect. Inf. Concepts Retr. Serv. 7(1), 1–207 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Groppe, S., Hartung, L. (2020). ReViz: A Tool for Automatically Generating Citation Graphs and Variants. In: Ishita, E., Pang, N.L.S., Zhou, L. (eds) Digital Libraries at Times of Massive Societal Transition. ICADL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12504. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64452-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64452-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64451-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64452-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)