Skip to main content

A Motivational Design Approach to Integrate MOOCs in Traditional Classrooms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Libraries at Times of Massive Societal Transition (ICADL 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12504))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Despite the promising benefits of blended Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) over traditional face-to-face class, it is still unclear how MOOCs should be integrated in the classroom. The findings regarding the effectiveness of such blended learning approach is mixed and inconclusive. The present study aims to address this gap by investigating how MOOCs can be embedded in traditional classrooms. An embedded MOOC learning approach is proposed, in which students use MOOCs together with their classmates during class under the guidance of their class instructors. Drawing from a motivational design perspective, we adopted the ARCS model (i.e. Attention, Relevance, Confidence and Satisfaction) to evaluate the proposed learning approach and compare it with traditional classroom learning and blended learning approaches. The results showed that students in the embedded MOOC learning group had higher evaluations regarding attention, satisfaction and relevance perceptions than those in the traditional face-to-face learning group. In addition, the embedded MOOC learning approach received higher scores in terms of attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction perceptions compared to traditional approach of blended MOOCs. The implications for research, educators and practitioners are discussed at the end of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barclay, C., Logan, D.: Towards an understanding of the implementation & adoption of massive online open courses (MOOCs) in a developing economy context. In: Annual Workshop of the AIS Special Interest Group for ICT in Global Development, Milano, Italy (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kennedy, J.: Characteristics of massive open online courses (MOOCs): a research review, 2009–2012. J. Interact. Online Learn. 13, 1–16 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chingos, M.M., et al.: Interactive online learning on campus: Comparing students’ outcomes in hybrid and traditional courses in the university system of Maryland. J. High. Educ. 88(2), 210–233 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jordan, K.: MOOC completion rates: The data.http://www.katyjordan.com/MOOCproject.html. Accessed 16 Apr 2020

  5. Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Adams, A.A., Williams, S.A.: MOOCs: a systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 14(3), 202–227 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ma, L., Lee, C.S.: Understanding the barriers to the use of MOOCs in a developing country: an innovation resistance perspective. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 57(3), 571–590 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yousef, A.M.F., et al.: A usability evaluation of a blended MOOC environment: an experimental case study. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 16(2), 69–93 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. López-Pérez, M.V., Pérez-López, M.C., Rodríguez-Ariza, L.: Blended learning in higher education: students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Comput. Educ. 56(3), 818–826 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Griffiths, R., et al.: Adopting MOOCS on campus: a collaborative effort to test MOOCS on campuses of the university system of Maryland. Online Learn. 19(2), 7–21 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Israel, M.J.: Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 16(5), 102–118 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Means, B., et al.: The effectiveness of online and blended learning: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teach. College Record 115(3), 134–162 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Emanuel, J.P., Lamb, A.: Open, online, and blended: transactional interactions with MOOC Content by learners in three different course formats. Soc. Sci. Electron. Publish. 21(2), 17–41 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Keller, J.M.: Using the ARCS motivational process in computer-based instruction and distance education. New Direct. Teach. Learn. 78, 37–47 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, Q., et al.: The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 18(1), 1–18 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bruff, D.O., et al.: Wrapping a MOOC: student perceptions of an experiment in blended learning. J. Online Learn. Teach. 9(2), 187–199 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Holotescu, C., et al.: Integrating MOOCs in blended courses. Elearn. Softw. Educ. 1, 243–250 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., Gannaway, D.: Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs. Comput. Educ. 129, 48–60 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. So, H.J., Brush, T.A.: Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: relationships and critical factors. Comput. Educ. 51(1), 318–336 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cocquyt, C., et al.: Examining the role of learning support in blended learning for adults’ social inclusion and social capital. Comput. Educ. 142, 103610 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Keller, J.M.: How to integrate learner motivation planning into lesson planning: the ARCS model approach. VII Semanario. Santiago, Cuba (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E., Gámiz-Sánchez, V.M., Gutiérrez-Pérez, J.: MOOC & B-learning: students’ barriers and satisfaction in formal and non-formal learning environments. J. Interact. Online Learn. 13(3), 88–111 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Huang, W., Huang, W., Diefes-Dux, H.A., Imbrie, P.K.: A preliminary validation of attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction model-based instructional material motivational survey in a computer-based tutorial setting. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 37(2), 243–259 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long Ma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ma, L., Lee, C.S. (2020). A Motivational Design Approach to Integrate MOOCs in Traditional Classrooms. In: Ishita, E., Pang, N.L.S., Zhou, L. (eds) Digital Libraries at Times of Massive Societal Transition. ICADL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12504. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64452-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64452-9_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64451-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64452-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics