Abstract
Refactoring is the de-facto practice to optimize software health. While there has been several studies proposing refactoring strategies to optimize software design through applying design patterns and removing design defects, little is known about how developers actually refactor their code to improve its reuse. Therefore, we extract, from 1,828 open source projects, a set of refactorings which were intended to improve the software reusability. We analyze the impact of reusability refactorings on state-of-the-art reusability metrics, and we compare the distribution of reusability refactoring types, with the distribution of the remaining mainstream refactorings. Overall, we found that the distribution of refactoring types, applied in the context of reusability, is different from the distribution of refactoring types in mainstream development. In the refactorings performed to improve reusability, source files are subject to more design level types of refactorings. Reusability refactorings significantly impact, high-level code elements, such as packages, classes, and methods, while typical refactorings, impact all code elements, including identifiers, and parameters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Regular expression was used to capture all expansions of reus such as reuses, reusing, reuse, etc.
- 5.
- 6.
References
AlOmar, E., Mkaouer, M.W., Ouni, A.: Can refactoring be self-affirmed? An exploratory study on how developers document their refactoring activities in commit messages. In: 2019 IEEE/ACM 3rd International Workshop on Refactoring (IWoR), pp. 51–58. IEEE (2019)
AlOmar, E.A., Mkaouer, M.W., Ouni, A.: Toward the automatic classification of self-affirmed refactoring. J. Syst. Softw. 171, 110821 (2020)
AlOmar, E.A., Mkaouer, M.W., Ouni, A., Kessentini, M.: On the impact of refactoring on the relationship between quality attributes and design metrics. In: 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), pp. 1–11. IEEE (2019)
Alshayeb, M.: Empirical investigation of refactoring effect on software quality. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(9), 1319–1326 (2009)
Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C.F.: A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 20(6), 476–493 (1994)
Fakhoury, S., Roy, D., Hassan, A., Arnaoudova, V.: Improving source code readability: theory and practice. In: 2019 IEEE/ACM 27th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC), pp. 2–12. IEEE (2019)
Fowler, M.: Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2018)
Lorenz, M., Kidd, J.: Object-Oriented Software Metrics, vol. 131. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1994)
McCabe, T.J.: A complexity measure. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 4, 308–320 (1976)
Moser, R., Sillitti, A., Abrahamsson, P., Succi, G.: Does refactoring improve reusability? In: Morisio, M. (ed.) ICSR 2006. LNCS, vol. 4039, pp. 287–297. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11763864_21
Munaiah, N., Kroh, S., Cabrey, C., Nagappan, M.: Curating GitHub for engineered software projects. Empirical Softw. Eng. 22(6), 3219–3253 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9512-6
Murphy-Hill, E., Parnin, C., Black, A.P.: How we refactor, and how we know it. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 38(1), 5–18 (2012)
Opdyke, W.F.: Refactoring object-oriented frameworks (1992)
Pantiuchina, J., Lanza, M., Bavota, G.: Improving code: the (mis) perception of quality metrics. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), pp. 80–91. IEEE (2018)
Peruma, A., Mkaouer, M.W., Decker, M.J., Newman, C.D.: Contextualizing rename decisions using refactorings, commit messages, and data types. J. Syst. Softw. 169, 110704 (2020)
Peruma, A., Newman, C.D., Mkaouer, M.W., Ouni, A., Palomba, F.: An exploratory study on the refactoring of unit test files in android applications. In: Conference on Software Engineering Workshops, ICSEW 2020 (2020)
Sharma, A., Kumar, R., Grover, P.: A critical survey of reusability aspects for component-based systems. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 19, 411–415 (2007)
Stroggylos, K., Spinellis, D.: Refactoring-does it improve software quality? In: Fifth International Workshop on Software Quality (WoSQ 2007: ICSE Workshops 2007), p. 10. IEEE (2007)
Tsantalis, N., Mansouri, M., Eshkevari, L.M., Mazinanian, D., Dig, D.: Accurate and efficient refactoring detection in commit history. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 483–494. ACM (2018)
Wilcoxon, F.: Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom. Bull. 1(6), 80–83 (1945)
Acknowledgements
This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1757680.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
AlOmar, E.A. et al. (2020). How Do Developers Refactor Code to Improve Code Reusability?. In: Ben Sassi, S., Ducasse, S., Mili, H. (eds) Reuse in Emerging Software Engineering Practices. ICSR 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12541. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64694-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64694-3_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64693-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64694-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)