Skip to main content

Towards a Method for Design Principle Development in Information Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Designing for Digital Transformation. Co-Creating Services with Citizens and Industry (DESRIST 2020)

Abstract

A central goal of doing research is to make findings available to the academic and practitioner community in order to extend the current knowledge base. The notion of how to generalize, abstract, and codify knowledge gained in design endeavors is a vital issue in design science, especially in the strand of design theory. Design principles provide a medium to make such design knowledge available to others and to make it transferable from a single application onto more scenarios that are subject to similar boundary conditions. The study proposes a preliminary method for the development of design principles based on a structured literature review and the inductive derivation of methodological components from it. The purpose of the method is to give researchers and practitioners executable steps to generate design principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://aisel.aisnet.org/do/search/.

References

  1. Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Purao, S., Bush, A., Rossi, M.: Problem and design spaces during object-oriented design: an exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the 34th HICSS (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dorst, K., Cross, N.: Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution. Des. Stud. 22, 425–437 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gregor, S., Müller, O., Seidel, S.: Reflection, abstraction, and theorizing in design and development research. In: Proceedings of the 21st ECIS (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis. Support Syst. 15, 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hilpinen, R.: Belief systems as artifacts. Monist 78, 136–155 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baker, L.R.: The shrinking difference between artifacts and natural objects. American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Simon, H.A.: Problem forming, problem finding and problem solving in design. In: Design & Systems, pp. 245–257 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Seidel, S., Chandra Kruse, L., Székely, N., Gau, M., Stieger, D.: Design principles for sensemaking support systems in environmental sustainability transformations. EJIS 27, 221–247 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cross, N.: Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science. Des. Issues 17, 49–55 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S.: Tensions in design principle formulation and reuse. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on DESRIST (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cross, N.: Design research: a disciplined conversation. Des. Issues 15, 5–10 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action design research. MIS Q. 35, 37–56 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cronholm, S., Göbel, H.: Design science research constructs: a conceptual model. In: Proceedings of the 23rd PACIS (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S., Purao, S.: Making use of design principles. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on DESRIST (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J.: Research perspectives: design theory indeterminacy: what is it, how can it be reduced, and why did the polar bear drown? JAIS 21(5) (2020). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00639. Article 1

  17. Hansen, M.R.P., Pries-Heje, J.: Value creation in knowledge networks: five design principles. SJIS 29, 61–79 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Koppenhagen, N., Gaß, O., Müller, B.: Design science research in action - anatomy of success critical activities for rigor and relevance. In: Proceedings of the 20th ECIS (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cronholm, S., Göbel, H.: Guidelines supporting the formulation of design principles. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACIS (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. van Aken, J.E.: Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. JMS 41, 219–246 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. JMIS 24, 45–77 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, R.G., Sawy, O.A.: Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. ISR 3, 36–59 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Heinrich, P., Schwabe, G.: Communicating nascent design theories on innovative information systems through multi-grounded design principles. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds.) DESRIST 2014. LNCS, vol. 8463, pp. 148–163. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Goldkuhl, G.: Design theories in information systems-a need for multi-grounding. JITTA 6, 59–72 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fu, K.K., Yang, M.C., Wood, K.L.: Design principles: the foundation of design. In: Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, p. 7 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. McAdams, D.A.: Identification and codification of principles for functional tolerance design. J. Eng. Des. 14, 355–375 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gregor, S.: Design theory in information systems. AJIS 10(1) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S., Gregor, S.: Prescriptive knowledge in is research: conceptualizing design principles in terms of materiality, action, and boundary conditions. In: Proceedings of the 48th HICSS (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37, 337–355 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W., Petter, S.: Design science research in information systems. http://www.desrist.org/design-research-in-information-systems/

  31. Iivari, J.: Towards information systems as a science of meta-artifacts. CAIS 12, 568–581 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Markus, M.L., Majchrzak, A., Gasser, L.: A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Q. 26, 179–212 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. JAIS 8, 312–335 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vom Brocke, J., et al.: Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In: Proceedings of the 17th ECIS (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Riemer, K., Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Standing on the shoulders of giants: challenges and recommendations of literature search in information systems research. CAIS 37, 205–224 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q.: Manag. Inf. Syst. 26, xiii–xxiii (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cooper, H.M.: Organizing knowledge syntheses: a taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowl. Soc. 1, 104 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Leedy, P.D., Ormrod, J.E.: Practical Research: Planning and Design. Pearson, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nickerson, R.C., Varshney, U., Muntermann, J.: A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. EJIS 22, 336–359 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schermann, M., Gehlert, A., Krcmar, H., Pohl, K.: Justifying design decisions with theory-based design principles. In: Proceedings of the 17th ECIS (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nunamaker, J.F., Chen, M., Purdin, T.D.M.: Systems development in information systems research. JMIS 7, 89–106 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rhyn, M., Blohm, I.: Combining collective and artificial intelligence: towards a design theory for decision support in crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the 25th ECIS (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Schoormann, T., Behrens, D., Knackstedt, R.: Design principles for leveraging sustainability in business modelling tools. In: Proceedings of the 26th ECIS (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kühne, B., Zolnowski, A., Bornholt, J., Böhmann, T.: Making data tangible for data-driven innovations in a business model context. In: Proceedings of the 25th AMCIS (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sun, D., Ying, W., Zhang, X., Feng, L.: Developing a blockchain-based loyalty programs system to hybridize business and charity: an action design research. In: Proceedings of the 40th ICIS (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kühne, B., Böhmann, T.: Data-driven business models - building the bridge between data and value. In: Proceedings of the 27th ECIS (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gregor, S.: Building theory in the sciences of the artificial. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on DESRIST (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bitzer, P., Söllner, M., Leimeister, J.M.: Design principles for high-performance blended learning services delivery. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 58(2), 135–149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0403-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Toreini, P., Langner, M., Maedche, A.: Designing attention-aware business intelligence and analytics dashboards to support task resumption. In: Proceedings of the 26th ECIS (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kuechler, B., Vaishnavi, V.: On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project. EJIS 17, 489–504 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lee, A.S., Baskerville, R.L.: Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. ISR 14, 221–243+315 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Möller, F., Guggenberger, T., Otto, B.: Design principles for route-optimization business models: a grounded theory study of user feedback. In: Proceedings of the 15th WI (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Schacht, S., Morana, S., Maedche, A.: The evolution of design principles enabling knowledge reuse for projects: an action design research project. JITTA 16, 5–36 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Tavanapour, N., Bittner, E.A.C., Brügger, M.: Theory-driven-design for open digital human collaboration systems. In: Proceedings of the 25th AMCIS (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Avdiji, H., Elikan, D.A., Missonier, S., Pigneur, Y.: Designing tools for collectively solving ill-structured problems. In: Proceedings of the 51st HICSS (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  56. van den Akker, J.: Principles and methods of development research. In: Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training, pp. 1–14. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kuechler, W., Vaishnavi, V.: A framework for theory development in design science research: multiple perspectives. JAIS 13, 395–423 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Schermann, M., Böhmann, T., Krcmar, H.: Explicating design theories with conceptual models: towards a theoretical role of reference models. In: Wissenschaftstheorie und gestaltungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 175–194 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Iivari, J., Hansen, M.R.P., Haj-Bolouri, A.: A framework for light reusability evaluation of design principles in design science research. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on DESRIST (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Tremblay, M., Vander Meer, D., Beck, R.: The effects of the quantification of faculty productivity: perspectives from the design science research community. CAIS 43, 625–661 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rosemann, M., Vessey, I.: Toward improving the relevance of information systems research to practice: the role of applicability checks. MIS Q. 32, 1–22 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by the Excellence Center for Logistics and IT funded by the Fraunhofer Gesellschaft and the Ministry of Culture and Science of the German State of North Rhine-Westphalia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederik Möller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Möller, F., Guggenberger, T.M., Otto, B. (2020). Towards a Method for Design Principle Development in Information Systems. In: Hofmann, S., Müller, O., Rossi, M. (eds) Designing for Digital Transformation. Co-Creating Services with Citizens and Industry. DESRIST 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12388. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64823-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64823-7_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64822-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64823-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics