Abstract
Pacemakers’ safety, security and reliability are of utmost importance for patient’s life quality in various daily situations. An integral characteristic of the pacemaker that depends on all of these attributes is its lifetime. In current medical practice the pacemaker’s expected lifetime is estimated relying on manufacturer’s data sheet and expert knowledge that may result in quite rough approximations if patient’s specifics are not taken into account. In this paper we perform a model-based quantitative analysis of pacemaker lifetime that takes into account patient specific factors, including general health condition, acting environment, remote reporting and others. We demonstrate that including these factors in analysis can provide drastically different results compared to that of average approximating estimates.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
https://www.fairview.org/patient-education/116363EN, Accessed 15 August 2020
https://www.wired.com/story/pacemaker-hack-malware-black-hat/
Medtronic Azure MRI Surescan Pacemaker Reference Manual, https://www.medtronic.com/us-en/healthcare-professionals/products/cardiac-rhythm/pacemakers/azure.html
Medtronic Azure MRI Surescan Pacemaker Technical Manual. https://www.medtronic.com/us-en/healthcare-professionals/products/cardiac-rhythm/pacemakers/azure.html
Ahmed, A., Hasan, O., Tahar, S., Mohamed, A.: Formal verification of energy consumption for an eeg monitoring wireless body area sensor network. In: 2016 International Conference on Open Source Systems Technologies (ICOSST), pp. 18–22. IEEE (2016)
Behrmann, Gerd., David, Alexandre, Larsen, Kim G.: A tutorial on Uppaal. In: Bernardo, Marco, Corradini, Flavio (eds.) SFM-RT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3185, pp. 200–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30080-9_7
Ben Hamouda, R., Ben Hafaiedh, I.: Formal modeling and verification of a wireless body area network (WBAN) protocol: S-tdma protocol. In: 2017 International Conference on Internet of Things, Embedded Systems and Communications (IINTEC), pp. 72–77. IEEE (2017)
Bulychev, P.E., et al.: UPPAAL-SMC: statistical model checking for priced timed automata. In: Wiklicky, H., Massink, M. (eds.) Proceedings 10th Workshop on Quantitative Aspects of Programming Languages and Systems (2012)
Chen, T., Yu, Z., Li, S., Chen, B.: From wireless sensor networks to wireless body area networks: formal modeling and verification on security using pat. J. Sens. 2016, 1–11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8797568
Cronin, B., Maus, T.M., Khoche, S., Rozner, M.A.: Chapter 4 - cardiovascular implantable electronic device management in noncardiac surgery. In: Kaplan, J.A., Cronin, B., Maus, T.M. (eds.) Essentials of Cardiac Anesthesia for Noncardiac Surgery, pp. 70–99. Elsevier, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-56716-9.00004-7, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323567169000047
Dai, S., Hong, M., Guo, B.: Synthesizing power management strategies for wireless sensor networks with UPPAAL-STRATEGO. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Networks 13(4) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147717700900
Granjal, J., Monteiro, E., Silva, J.S.: End-to-end transport-layer security for internet-integrated sensing applications with mutual and delegated ECC public-key authentication. In: 2013 IFIP Networking Conference, pp. 1–9. IEEE (2013)
Hsu, C.L., Avudaiappan, R.: Bluetooth technology. Academia Sinica Computing Centre 18, (2002)
Hummen, R., Shafagh, H., Raza, S., Voig, T., Wehrle, K.: Delegation-based authentication and authorization for the IP-based internet of things. In: 2014 Eleventh Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON), pp. 284–292 (2014)
Kramer, D.B., Fu, K.: Cybersecurity concerns and medical devices: lessons from a pacemaker advisory. JAMA 318(21), 2077–2078 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.15692
Li, C., Raghunathan, A., Jha, N.K.: Hijacking an insulin pump: security attacks and defenses for a diabetes therapy system. In: 2011 IEEE 13th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services, pp. 150–156. IEEE (2011)
Moosavi, S.R., Nigussie, E., Levorato, M., Virtanen, S., Isoaho, J.: Performance analysis of end-to-end security schemes in healthcare IoT. Procedia Comput. Sci. 130, 432–439 (2018)
Pajic, M., Jiang, Z., Lee, I., Sokolsky, O., Mangharam, R.: From verification to implementation: a model translation tool and a pacemaker case study. In: 2012 IEEE 18th Real Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium, pp. 173–184. IEEE (2012)
Pycroft, L., Aziz, T.Z.: Security of implantable medical devices with wireless connections: the dangers of cyber-attacks. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 15(6), 403–406 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2018.1483235
Raatikainen, M.P., et al.: Statistics on the use of cardiac electronic devices and electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology countries: 2014 report from the european heart rhythm association. EP Europace 17(suppl-1), i1–i75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu300
Rao, A., Rozenblit, J., Lysecky, R., Sametinger, J.: Composite risk modeling for automated threat mitigation in medical devices. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Modeling and Simulation in Medicine, MSM 2017, pp. 1–10. Society for Computer Simulation International, San Diego, CA, USA (2017)
Rescorla, E., Modadugu, N.: Datagram transport layer security version 1.2. RFC 6347, 1–32 (2012)
Tarakji, K., et al.: P577 Early experience with the first pacemakers to directly connect with smart devices for remote monitoring. Eur. Heart J. 40(Supplement_1) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0188, ehz747.0188
Varma, N., et al.: The relationship between level of adherence to automatic wireless remote monitoring and survival in pacemaker and defibrillator patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 65(24), 2601–2610 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.033
Acknowledgement
This work has been supported by the ERDF funded centre of excellence project EXCITE (2014–2020.4.01.15-0018), the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research institutional research grant no. IUT33-13 and supported in part by the Estonian Research Council grant PRG 424.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tsiopoulos, L., Kuusik, A., Vain, J., Bahsi, H. (2020). Model-Based Analysis of Secure and Patient-Dependent Pacemaker Monitoring System. In: Alam, M.M., Hämäläinen, M., Mucchi, L., Niazi, I.K., Le Moullec, Y. (eds) Body Area Networks. Smart IoT and Big Data for Intelligent Health. BODYNETS 2020. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 330. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64991-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64991-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64990-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64991-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)