Skip to main content

Model-Based Analysis of Secure and Patient-Dependent Pacemaker Monitoring System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Body Area Networks. Smart IoT and Big Data for Intelligent Health (BODYNETS 2020)

Abstract

Pacemakers’ safety, security and reliability are of utmost importance for patient’s life quality in various daily situations. An integral characteristic of the pacemaker that depends on all of these attributes is its lifetime. In current medical practice the pacemaker’s expected lifetime is estimated relying on manufacturer’s data sheet and expert knowledge that may result in quite rough approximations if patient’s specifics are not taken into account. In this paper we perform a model-based quantitative analysis of pacemaker lifetime that takes into account patient specific factors, including general health condition, acting environment, remote reporting and others. We demonstrate that including these factors in analysis can provide drastically different results compared to that of average approximating estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. https://www.fairview.org/patient-education/116363EN, Accessed 15 August 2020

  2. https://www.wired.com/story/pacemaker-hack-malware-black-hat/

  3. https://www.medtronic.com/us-en/healthcare-professionals/products/cardiac-rhythm/managing-patients/improved-outcomes/remote-monitoring-options.html

  4. Medtronic Azure MRI Surescan Pacemaker Reference Manual, https://www.medtronic.com/us-en/healthcare-professionals/products/cardiac-rhythm/pacemakers/azure.html

  5. Medtronic Azure MRI Surescan Pacemaker Technical Manual. https://www.medtronic.com/us-en/healthcare-professionals/products/cardiac-rhythm/pacemakers/azure.html

  6. Ahmed, A., Hasan, O., Tahar, S., Mohamed, A.: Formal verification of energy consumption for an eeg monitoring wireless body area sensor network. In: 2016 International Conference on Open Source Systems Technologies (ICOSST), pp. 18–22. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Behrmann, Gerd., David, Alexandre, Larsen, Kim G.: A tutorial on Uppaal. In: Bernardo, Marco, Corradini, Flavio (eds.) SFM-RT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3185, pp. 200–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30080-9_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ben Hamouda, R., Ben Hafaiedh, I.: Formal modeling and verification of a wireless body area network (WBAN) protocol: S-tdma protocol. In: 2017 International Conference on Internet of Things, Embedded Systems and Communications (IINTEC), pp. 72–77. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bulychev, P.E., et al.: UPPAAL-SMC: statistical model checking for priced timed automata. In: Wiklicky, H., Massink, M. (eds.) Proceedings 10th Workshop on Quantitative Aspects of Programming Languages and Systems (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, T., Yu, Z., Li, S., Chen, B.: From wireless sensor networks to wireless body area networks: formal modeling and verification on security using pat. J. Sens. 2016, 1–11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8797568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cronin, B., Maus, T.M., Khoche, S., Rozner, M.A.: Chapter 4 - cardiovascular implantable electronic device management in noncardiac surgery. In: Kaplan, J.A., Cronin, B., Maus, T.M. (eds.) Essentials of Cardiac Anesthesia for Noncardiac Surgery, pp. 70–99. Elsevier, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-56716-9.00004-7, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323567169000047

  12. Dai, S., Hong, M., Guo, B.: Synthesizing power management strategies for wireless sensor networks with UPPAAL-STRATEGO. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Networks 13(4) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147717700900

  13. Granjal, J., Monteiro, E., Silva, J.S.: End-to-end transport-layer security for internet-integrated sensing applications with mutual and delegated ECC public-key authentication. In: 2013 IFIP Networking Conference, pp. 1–9. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu, C.L., Avudaiappan, R.: Bluetooth technology. Academia Sinica Computing Centre 18, (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hummen, R., Shafagh, H., Raza, S., Voig, T., Wehrle, K.: Delegation-based authentication and authorization for the IP-based internet of things. In: 2014 Eleventh Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON), pp. 284–292 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kramer, D.B., Fu, K.: Cybersecurity concerns and medical devices: lessons from a pacemaker advisory. JAMA 318(21), 2077–2078 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.15692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, C., Raghunathan, A., Jha, N.K.: Hijacking an insulin pump: security attacks and defenses for a diabetes therapy system. In: 2011 IEEE 13th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services, pp. 150–156. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moosavi, S.R., Nigussie, E., Levorato, M., Virtanen, S., Isoaho, J.: Performance analysis of end-to-end security schemes in healthcare IoT. Procedia Comput. Sci. 130, 432–439 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pajic, M., Jiang, Z., Lee, I., Sokolsky, O., Mangharam, R.: From verification to implementation: a model translation tool and a pacemaker case study. In: 2012 IEEE 18th Real Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium, pp. 173–184. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pycroft, L., Aziz, T.Z.: Security of implantable medical devices with wireless connections: the dangers of cyber-attacks. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 15(6), 403–406 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2018.1483235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Raatikainen, M.P., et al.: Statistics on the use of cardiac electronic devices and electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology countries: 2014 report from the european heart rhythm association. EP Europace 17(suppl-1), i1–i75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rao, A., Rozenblit, J., Lysecky, R., Sametinger, J.: Composite risk modeling for automated threat mitigation in medical devices. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Modeling and Simulation in Medicine, MSM 2017, pp. 1–10. Society for Computer Simulation International, San Diego, CA, USA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rescorla, E., Modadugu, N.: Datagram transport layer security version 1.2. RFC 6347, 1–32 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tarakji, K., et al.: P577 Early experience with the first pacemakers to directly connect with smart devices for remote monitoring. Eur. Heart J. 40(Supplement_1) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0188, ehz747.0188

  25. Varma, N., et al.: The relationship between level of adherence to automatic wireless remote monitoring and survival in pacemaker and defibrillator patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 65(24), 2601–2610 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work has been supported by the ERDF funded centre of excellence project EXCITE (2014–2020.4.01.15-0018), the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research institutional research grant no. IUT33-13 and supported in part by the Estonian Research Council grant PRG 424.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonidas Tsiopoulos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tsiopoulos, L., Kuusik, A., Vain, J., Bahsi, H. (2020). Model-Based Analysis of Secure and Patient-Dependent Pacemaker Monitoring System. In: Alam, M.M., Hämäläinen, M., Mucchi, L., Niazi, I.K., Le Moullec, Y. (eds) Body Area Networks. Smart IoT and Big Data for Intelligent Health. BODYNETS 2020. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 330. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64991-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64991-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64990-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64991-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics