Abstract
Web-based interactions allow agents to coordinate and to take actions (change state) jointly, i.e., to participate in collective action such as a protest, facilitating spread of contagion to large groups within networked populations. In game theoretic contexts, coordination requires that agents share common knowledge about each other. Common knowledge emerges within a group when each member knows the states and the types (preferences) of the other members, and critically, each member knows that everyone else has this information. Hence, these models of common knowledge and coordination on communication networks are fundamentally different from influence-based unilateral contagion models, such as those devised by Granovetter and Centola. Common knowledge arises in many settings in practice, yet there are few operational models that can be used to compute contagion dynamics. Moreover, these models utilize different mechanisms for driving contagion. We evaluate the three mechanisms of a common knowledge model that can represent web-based communication among groups of people on Facebook. We evaluate these mechanisms on five social (media) networks with wide-ranging properties. We demonstrate that different mechanisms can produce widely varying behaviors in terms of the extent of contagion spreading and the speed of contagion transmission.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmed, N.K., Alo, R.A., Amelink, C.T., et al.: net.science: a cyberinfrastructure for sustained innovation in network science and engineering. In: Gateway (2020)
Alexe, G., Alexe, S., Crama, Y., Foldes, S., Hammer, P.L., Simeone, B.: Consensus algorithms for the generation of all maximal bicliques. DAM 145, 11–21 (2004)
Barabasi, A., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Nature 286, 509–512 (1999)
Cheng, J., Adamic, L.A., Dow, P.A., Kleinberg, J., Leskovec, J.: Can cascades be predicted? In: WWW (2014)
Chwe, M.S.Y.: Communication and coordination in social networks. Rev. Econ. Stud. 67, 1–16 (2000)
Chwe, M.S.Y.: Structure and strategy in collective action. Am. J. Sociol. 105, 128–156 (1999)
Devineni, P., Koutra, D., Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, C.: If walls could talk: Patterns and anomalies in facebook wallposts. In: ASONAM, pp. 367–374 (2015)
Gonzalez-Bailon, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., Moreno, Y.: The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Sci. Rep. 1, 1–7 (2011)
Granovetter, M.: Threshold models of collective behavior. Am. J. Soc. 83(6), 1420–1443 (1978)
Huang, T.K., Rahman, M.S., Madhyastha, H.V., Faloutsos, M., et al.: An analysis of socware cascades in online social networks. In: WWW, pp. 619–630 (2013)
Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, E.: Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: KDD, pp. 137–146 (2003)
Korkmaz, G., Capra, M., Kraig, A., Lakkaraju, K., Kuhlman, C.J., Vega-Redondo, F.: Coordination and common knowledge on communication networks. In: Proceedings of the AAMAS Conference, 10–15 July, pp. 1062–1070, Stockholm (2018)
Korkmaz, G., Kuhlman, C.J., Marathe, A., et al.: Collective action through common knowledge using a Facebook model. In: AAMAS (2014)
Korkmaz, G., Kuhlman, C.J., Ravi, S.S., Vega-Redondo, F.: Approximate contagion model of common knowledge on Facebook. In: Hypertext, pp. 231–236 (2016)
Korkmaz, G., Kuhlman, C.J., Vega-Redondo, F.: Can social contagion spread without key players? In: BESC (2016)
Leskovec, J., Krevl, A.: SNAP Datasets: stanford large network dataset collection, June 2014. http://snap.stanford.edu/data
Romero, D., Meeder, B., Kleinberg, J.: Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion. In: WWW (2011)
Sun, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C.A., Lento, T.M.: Gesundheit! modeling contagion through Facebook news feed. In: ICWSM (2009)
Tong, H., Prakash, B., Eliassi-Rad, T., Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, C.: Gelling, and melting, large graphs by edge manipulation. In: CIKM, pp. 245–254 (2012)
Viswanath, B., Mislove, A., Cha, M., Gummadi, K.P.: On the evolution of user interaction in Facebook. In: WOSN, August 2009
Watts, D.: A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (PNAS) 99(9), 5766–5771 (2002)
Acknowledgments
We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF IIS-1908530, NSF OAC-1916805, and NSF CRISP 2.0 Grant 1832587) and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under award number FA9550-17-1-0378. Any opinions, finding, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Air Force.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kuhlman, C.J., Korkmaz, G., Ravi, S.S., Vega-Redondo, F. (2021). Effect of Interaction Mechanisms on Facebook Dynamics Using a Common Knowledge Model. In: Benito, R.M., Cherifi, C., Cherifi, H., Moro, E., Rocha, L.M., Sales-Pardo, M. (eds) Complex Networks & Their Applications IX. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2020 2020. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 943. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65347-7_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65347-7_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65346-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65347-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)