Skip to main content

Differential Privacy Approach to Solve Gradient Leakage Attack in a Federated Machine Learning Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Data and Social Networks (CSoNet 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12575))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The growth of federated machine learning in recent times has dramatically leveraged the traditional machine learning technique for intrusion detection. Keeping the dataset for training at decentralized nodes, federated machine learning have kept the people’s data private; however, federated machine learning mechanism still suffers from gradient leakage attacks. Adversaries are now taking advantage of those gradients and can reconstruct the people’s private data with greater accuracy. Adversaries are using these private network data later on to launch more devastating attacks against users. At this time, it becomes essential to develop a solution that prevents these attacks. This paper has introduced differential privacy, which uses Gaussian and Laplace mechanisms to secure updated gradients during the communication. Our result shows that clients can achieve a significant level of accuracy with differentially private gradients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gupta, S., Gupta, B.B.: Detection, avoidance, and attack pattern mechanisms in modern web application vulnerabilities: present and future challenges. Int. J. Cloud Appl. Comput. (IJCAC) 7(3), 1–43 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar, A.: Design of secure image fusion technique using cloud for privacy-preserving and copyright protection. Int. J. Cloud Appl. Comput. (IJCAC) 9(3), 22–36 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jain, A.K., Gupta, B.B.: Towards detection of phishing websites on client-side using machine learning based approach. Telecommun. Syst. 68(4), 687–700 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang, F., et al.: Deep learning based multi-channel intelligent attack detection for data security. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Comput. 5, 204–212 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramos, J., Nedjah, N., de Macedo Mourelle, L., et al.: Visual data mining for crowd anomaly detection using artificial bacteria colony. Multimed. Tools Appl. 77(14), 17755–17777 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng, K., et al.: Secureboost: a lossless federated learning framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.08755 (2019)

  7. Wei, W., et al.: A framework for evaluating gradient leakage attacks in federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10397 (2020)

  8. Geiping, J., et al.: Inverting gradients–how easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.14053 (2020)

  9. Geyer, R.C., Tassilo, K., Moin, N.: Differentially private federated learning: a client level perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.07557 (2017)

  10. Truex, S., et al.: A hybrid approach to privacy-preserving federated learning. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Truex, S., et al.: LDP-fed: federated learning with local differential privacy. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM International Workshop on Edge Systems, Analytics and Networking (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Triastcyn, A., Boi, F.: Federated learning with Bayesian differential privacy. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wei, K., et al.: Federated learning with differential privacy: algorithms and performance analysis. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 15, 3454–3469 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2020.2988575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dwork, C., Roth, A.: The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci. 9(3-4), 211–407 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Holohan, N., et al.: Diffprivlib: the IBM differential privacy library. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.02444 (2019)

  16. Dhanabal, L., Shantharajah, S.P.: A study on NSL-KDD dataset for intrusion detection system based on classification algorithms. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 4(6), 446–452 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. B. Gupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yadav, K., Gupta, B.B., Chui, K.T., Psannis, K. (2020). Differential Privacy Approach to Solve Gradient Leakage Attack in a Federated Machine Learning Environment. In: Chellappan, S., Choo, KK.R., Phan, N. (eds) Computational Data and Social Networks. CSoNet 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12575. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66046-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66046-8_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66045-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66046-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics