Skip to main content

Comparing Performance of Classifiers Applied to Disaster Detection in Twitter Tweets – Preliminary Considerations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Big Data Analytics (BDA 2020)

Abstract

Nowadays, disaster “detection”, based on Twitter tweets, has become an interesting research challenge. As such it has even found its way to a Kaggle competition. In this work, we explore (and compare) multiple classifiers, applied to the data set from that challenge. Moreover, we explore usefulness of different preprocessing approaches. We experimentally establish the most successful pairs, consisting of a preprocessor and a classifier. We also report on initial steps undertaken towards combining results from multiple classifiers into a meta-level one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ajao, O., Bhowmik, D., Zargari, S.: Fake news identification on twitter with hybrid CNN and RNN models. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Media and Society. SMSociety (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3217804.3217917

  2. Ashktorab, Z., Brown, C., Nandi, M., Mellon, C.: Tweedr: mining twitter to inform disaster response. In: Proceedings of the 11th International ISCRAM Conference - University Park, May 2014. http://amulyayadav.com/spring19/pdf/asht.pdf

  3. CrisisLex: Crisislex data set. https://github.com/sajao/CrisisLex/tree/master/data/CrisisLexT26

  4. CrisisNLP: Crisisnlp data set. https://crisisnlp.qcri.org/

  5. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding, May 2019. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.04805.pdf, arXiv: 1810.04805

  6. Es, S.: Basic EDA, cleaning and glove. https://www.kaggle.com/shahules/basic-eda-cleaning-and-glove

  7. Ganzha, M., Paprzycki, M., Stadnik, J.: Combining information from multiple search engines - preliminary comparison. Inf. Sci. 180(10), 1908–1923 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Google: BERT GitHub. https://github.com/google-research/bert

  9. Kaggle: Kaggle competition leaderboard. https://www.kaggle.com/c/nlp-getting-started/leaderboard

  10. Kaggle: Kaggle competition: real or not? NLP with disaster tweets. Predict which tweets are about real disasters and which ones are not. https://www.kaggle.com/c/nlp-getting-started/overview

  11. Keras: Keras embedding layer. https://keras.io/api/layers/core_layers/embedding/

  12. Keras: Keras library. https://keras.io/

  13. Kursuncu, U., Gaur, M., Lokala, K.T.U., Sheth, A., Arpinar, I.B.: Predictive analysis on Twitter: techniques and applications. Kno.e.sis Center, Wright State University, Jun 2018. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.02377.pdf, arXiv: 1806.02377

  14. Ma, G.: Tweets classification with BERT in the field of disaster management. Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University (2019). https://web.stanford.edu/class/archive/cs/cs224n/cs224n.1194/reports/custom/15785631.pdf

  15. NLTK: NLTK library. https://www.nltk.org/

  16. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: GloVe: global vectors for word representation. https://nlp.stanford.edu/projects/glove/

  17. Plakhtiy, M.: Applying machine learning to disaster detection in twitter tweets. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1k2BGDn3t76rQjQIMA2GaRIzSFLXwnEIf/view?usp=sharing

  18. Plakhtiy, M.: Results on google drive. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eP0DdEMxzNLT6ecfdN5Kf5ctK1BSYNgoq1YHylSVDLc/edit?usp=sharing

  19. SkLearn: count vectorizer. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.feature_extraction.text.CountVectorizer.html

  20. SkLearn: Scikit-learn library user guide. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/user_guide.html

  21. SkLearn: StratifiedKFold. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.model_selection.StratifiedKFold.html

  22. SkLearn: TFIDF vectorizer. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.feature_extraction.text.TfidfVectorizer.html

  23. Stadnik, J., Ganzha, M., Paprzycki, M.: Are many heads better than one - on combining information from multiple internet sources. Intelligent Distributed Computing, Systems and Applications, pp. 177–186 (2008). http://www.ibspan.waw.pl/~paprzyck/mp/cvr/research/agent_papers/IDC_consensus_2008.pdf, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85257-5_18

  24. Thanos, K.G., Polydouri, A., Danelakis, A., Kyriazanos, D., Thomopoulos, S.C.: Combined deep learning and traditional NLP approaches for fire burst detection based on twitter posts. In: IntechOpen, April 2019. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85075

  25. Wikipedia: Logistic regression. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_regression

  26. Yang, Z., Yang, D., Dyer, C., He, X., Smola, A., Hovy, E.: Hierarchical attention networks for document classification. Carnegie Mellon University, Microsoft Research, Redmond, June 2016. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~./hovy/papers/16HLT-hierarchical-attention-networks.pdf

  27. Zhang, C., Rajendran, A., Abdul-Mageed, M.: Hyperpartisan news detection with attention-based BI-LSTMS. Natural Language Processing Lab, The University of British Columbia (2019). https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/S19-2188.pdf

  28. Zubiaga, A., Hoi, G.W.S., Liakata, M., Procter, R.: PHEME data set. https://figshare.com/articles/PHEME_dataset_of_rumours_and_non-rumours/4010619

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Paprzycki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Plakhtiy, M., Ganzha, M., Paprzycki, M. (2020). Comparing Performance of Classifiers Applied to Disaster Detection in Twitter Tweets – Preliminary Considerations. In: Bellatreche, L., Goyal, V., Fujita, H., Mondal, A., Reddy, P.K. (eds) Big Data Analytics. BDA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12581. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66665-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66665-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66664-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66665-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics