Skip to main content

Metamorphosis of Space into Digital Scholarship. A Research on Hybrid Mediation in a University Context

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Bridges and Mediation in Higher Distance Education (HELMeTO 2020)

Abstract

The digitalization of the university system in Italy has proceeded “bottom-up” through the dissemination of good practices towards more and more institutionalized interventions until the spring of 2020. With the Prime Ministerial Decree (DPCM) on 9 March 2020, in fact, Italian universities were forced to suspend face to face attendance of degree courses due to the Covid-19 emergency. This made it necessary to rethink the educational space that became digital. This space requires the didactic mediation of the teacher, without which the most sophisticated offers would remain “mute”. The research moves from our specific interest in identifying the main components of the imposed digital “metamorphosis” and the forms and formats of hybridization introduced in educational mediation in times of Covid-19 crisis.

The work presents the case of a “hybrid mediation” emerging in an academic context. The research project followed a phenomenological approach and a method of practical analysis with mixed methods with four different data collection actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cfr. Damiano, E.: La mediazione didattica, Franco Angeli, Milano, 2013 pp. 210–234. He reconstructs with unsurpassed clarity the reasons for the failures of all attempts to integrate technologies into face-to-face teaching: the causes lie in not solved a decisive problem in distance learning: the evaluation.

References

  1. Thorin, A., Rudolph, D., Vogl, R.: Digitalization of higher education from a student’s point of view. In: EUNIS (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tømte, C.E., Fossland, T., Aamodt, P.O., Degn, L.: Digitalisation in higher education: mapping institutional approaches for teaching and learning. Qual. High. Educ. 25(1), 98–114 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Limone, P.: Ambienti di apprendimento e progettazione didattica. Proposte per un sistema educativo transmediale. Carocci, Roma (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rivoltella, P.C.: Media Education. La Morcelliana, Brescia (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gaebel, M., Kupriyanova, V., Morais, R., Colucci, E.: E-Learning in European Higher Education Institutions. European University Association (EUA), Brussels (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paleari, S., Corradini, F., Perali, A., Porta, F., Breno, E.: MOOCs - Massive Open On-line Courses. Prospettive e Opportunità per l’Università italiana. Fondazione CRUI (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferri, P.: Università online, l’Italia tra gravi ritardi ed esamifici virtuali. In: Agenda Digitale (2017). testo disponibile sul sito: www.agendadigitale.eu/cultura-digitale

  8. Williamson, B., Eynon, R., Potter, J.: Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learn. Media Technol. 45(2), 107–114 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Trinchero, R.: Insegnare e valutare nella formazione a “distanza forzata”. In: Scuola7 (2020). http://www.scuola7.it/2020/181/?page=1

  10. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., Bond, A.: The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. (2020). https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

  11. Laurillard, D.: Rethinking teaching for the knowledge society. EDUCAUSE Rev. 37(1), 16–24 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Damiano, E.: La mediazione didattica. FrancoAngeli, Milano (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deschamps, J.: La Mèdiation. Un concept pour les sciences de l’information et de la communication. ISTE Editions, London (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Felisatti, E.: PRODID: modelli, strategie e dispositivi operativi per un intervento sulla qualificazione della docenza universitaria nel contesto italiano. In: Felisatti, E., Serbati, A. (a cura di) Preparare alla professionalità docente e innovare la didattica universitaria, FrancoAngeli, Milano (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Perla, L.: L’innovazione curricolare nella formazione del docente universitario: l’esperienza nel TLL. In: Corbo, F., Michelini, M., Uricchio, A.F. (a cura di) Innovazione didattica universitaria e strategie degli Atenei italiani. 100 contributi di 27 Università a confronto. Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Perla, L., Vinci, V.: TLL (Teaching Learning Laboratory) e formazione dialettica dei docenti universitari alla didattica: primi passi verso la certificazione della competenza pedagogica in Uniba. Lifelong Lifewide Learn. 15(32), 68–88 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Scarinci, A., Dipace, A.: Formazione pedagogica per l’insegnamento: il nuovo profilo professionale del docente universitario. In: Dipace, A., Tamborra, V., (a cura di) Insegnare in università. Metodi e strumenti per una didattica efficace. Franco Angeli, Milano (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rinaldi, C.: In dialogo con Reggio Emilia: ascoltare, ricercare e apprendere: discorsi e interventi 1984–2007. Reggio Children (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Malaguzzi, L.: I cento linguaggi dei bambini. L’approccio di Reggio Emilia all’educazione dell’infanzia. Edizioni Junior, Bergamo (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ceruti, M., Lazzarini, A.: Il “terzo spazio”. Per una pedagogia della complessità, “Pedagogia oggi”, 1/2016, semestrale SIPED, pp. 202–213 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Foucault, M.: La volontà di sapere, tr. it. Feltrinelli, Milano (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Varisco, B.M.: Valutare gli apprendimenti e le competenze. Carocci Editore, Roma (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Perla, L.: La mediazione ‘plurale’ nel lavoro educativo. In: Perla, L., Riva, M.G.: L’agire educativo. Manuale per educatori socio-assistenziali. La Scuola, Brescia (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Laneve, C.: Analisi di pratica educativa. Metodologie e risultanze della ricerca. La Scuola, Brescia (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Perla, L.: L’intervista per dire della pratica. In: Laneve, C. (ed.) Analisi della pratica educativa. La Scuola, Brescia (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Perla, L.: Didattica dell’implicito. Ciò che l’insegnante non sa. La Scuola, Brescia (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Agrati, L.: Alla conquista del sapere pratico. Il laboratorio nella formazione degli insegnanti. Carocci, Roma (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bhabha, H.: I luoghi della cultura. Meltemi, Roma (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Potter, J., McDougall, J.: Digital Media, Culture and Education: Theorizing Third Space Literacies. Palgrave MacMillan, London (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Rivoltella, P.C.: New Literacies, editoriale Essere a Scuola n. 6/2020 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Castells, M.: La città delle reti. Marsilio, Venezia (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bocchi, G., Ceruti, M.: La sfida della complessità. Bruno Mondadori, Milano (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Weller, M.: The Digital Scholar How Technology is TRANSFORMING scholarly Practice. Bloomsbury Academic, Basingstoke (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cope, B., Kalantzis, M.: New Learning: Elements of a Science of Education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Altet, M.: L’évolucion des recherchers sur le processus enseignement-apprendissage et leur rôle en formation d’enseignants. Actes Colloque AIPELF, Lisbonne (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Perla, L.: Scrittura e tirocinio universitario. Una ricerca sulla documentazione. FrancoAngeli, Milano (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Perla, L., Agrati, L.S., Vinci, V.: The ‘Sophisticated’ knowledge of e-Teacher. Re-shape Digital Resources for Online Courses. In: Burgos, D., et al. (eds.) HELMeTO 2019. CCIS, vol. 1091, pp. 3–17. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31284-8_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Leech, N., Onwuegbuzie, A.J.: A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual. Quant. 43(2), 265–275 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tashakorri, A., Teddlie, C.: Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Sage, Thousand Oakes (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cameron, R.: Mixed methods research: a world of metaphors (chap. 4). In: Midgley, W., Trimmer, K., Davies, A. (eds.) Metaphors for, in and of Education Research, pp. 51–65. Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cameron, R.: The emerging use of mixed methods in educational research (chap. 8). In: Baguley, M., Findlay, Y.S., Karby, M.C. (eds.) Meanings and Motivation in Education Research. Routledge, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lewins, A., Silver, C.: Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step by Step Guide. Sage, London (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. Pacifico, M., Coppola, L.: NVivo: una risorsa metodologica. Procedure per l’analisi dei dati qualitativi. FrancoAngeli, Milano (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  44. BazeKey, P., Jackson, K.: Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. Sage, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, Newbury Park (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Charmaz, K.: Grounded theory in the 21st century. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Terza edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., Guttman, M., Hanson, W.: Advanced mixed methods research designs. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C., Teddlie, C.B. (eds.) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Creswell, J.W.: Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design. Choosing Among Five Approaches, 2nd edn. Sage, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mortari, L.: Cultura Della ricerca e pedagogia. Carocci, Roma (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tarozzi, M.: Che cos’è la grounded Theory. Carocci, Roma (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mortari, L.: Dire la pratica. Bruno Mondadori, Milano (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Houssaye, J.: Le triangle pédagogique. Théorie et pratiques de l’éducation scolaire. Peter Lang, Verlag, Bern (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Loredana Perla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Perla, L., Scarinci, A., Amati, I. (2021). Metamorphosis of Space into Digital Scholarship. A Research on Hybrid Mediation in a University Context. In: Agrati, L.S., et al. Bridges and Mediation in Higher Distance Education. HELMeTO 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1344. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67435-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67435-9_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67434-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67435-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics