Skip to main content

Weighted Microscopic Image Reconstruction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
SOFSEM 2021: Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SOFSEM 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12607))

Abstract

Assume that we inspect a specimen represented as a collection of points. The points are typically organized on a grid structure in 2D- or 3D-space, and each point has an associated physical value. The goal of the inspection is to determine these values. Yet, measuring these values directly (by surgical probes) may damage the specimen or is simply impossible. The alternative is to employ aggregate measuring techniques (e.g., CT or MRI), whereby measurements are taken over subsets of points, and the exact values at each point are subsequently extracted by computational methods. In the Minimum Surgical Probing problem (MSP) the inspected specimen is represented by a graph G and a vector \(\ell \in \mathbb {R}^n\) that assigns a value \(\ell _i\) to each vertex i. An aggregate measurement (called probe) centered at vertex i captures its entire neighborhood, i.e., the outcome of a probe centered at i is \(\mathcal{P}_i = \sum _{j \in N(i) \cup \{i\}} \ell _j\) where N(i) is the open neighborhood of vertex i. Bar-Noy et al. [4] gave a criterion whether the vector \(\ell \) can be recovered from the collection of probes \(\mathcal{P}= \{\, \mathcal{P}_v \; | \; v \in V(G)\}\) alone. However, there are graphs where \(\mathcal{P}\) is inconclusive, i.e., there are several vectors \(\ell \) that are consistent with \(\mathcal{P}\). In these cases, we are allowed to use surgical probes. A surgical probe at vertex i returns \(\ell _i\). The objective of MSP is to recover \(\ell \) from \(\mathcal{P}\) and G using as few surgical probes as possible.

In this work, we introduce the Weighted Minimum Surgical Probing (WMSP) problem in which a vertex i may have an aggregation coefficient \(w_i\), namely \(\mathcal{P}_i = \sum _{j \in N(i)} \ell _j + w_i \ell _i\). We show that WMSP can be solved in polynomial time. Moreover, we analyze the number of required surgical probes depending on the weight vector \(w\). For any graph, we give two boundaries outside of which no surgical probes are needed to recover the vector \(\ell \). The boundaries are connected to the (Signless) Laplacian matrix.

In addition, we focus on the special case, where . We explore the range of possible behaviors of WMSP by determining the number of surgical probes necessary in certain graph families, such as trees and various grid graphs. Finally, we analyze higher dimensional grids graphs. For the hypercube, when , we only need surgical probes if the dimension is odd, and when , we only need surgical probes if the dimension is even. The number of surgical probes follows the binomial coefficients.

This work was supported by US-Israel BSF grant 2018043 and ARL Cooperative Grant ARL Network Science CTA W911NF-09-2-0053.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alpers, A., Gritzmann, P.: Reconstructing binary matrices under window constraints from their row and column sums. Fundamenta Informaticae 155(4), 321–340 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alpers, A., Gritzmann, P.: Dynamic discrete tomography. Inv. Prob. 34(3), 034003 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Alpers, A., Gritzmann, P.: On double-resolution imaging and discrete tomography. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 32(2), 1369–1399 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bar-Noy, A., Böhnlein, T., Lotker, Z., Peleg, D., Rawitz, D.: The generalized microscopic image reconstruction problem. In: 30th ISAAC, pp. 42:1–42:15 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Battaglino, D., Frosini, A., Rinaldi, S.: A decomposition theorem for homogeneous sets with respect to diamond probes. Comp. Vis. Image Underst. 117(4), 319–325 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brouwer, A.E., Haemers, W.H.: Spectra of Graphs. Springer, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cvetković, D., Rowlinson, P., Simić, S.K.: Signless Laplacians of finite graphs. Linear Algebra Appl. 423(1), 155–171 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Cvetković, D., Simić, S.K.: Towards a spectral theory of graphs based on the signless Laplacian. I. Publications de l’Institut Mathematique 85(99), 19–33 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Cvetković, D., Simić, S.K.: Towards a spectral theory of graphs based on the signless Laplacian. II. Linear Algebra Appl. 432(9), 2257–2272 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Cvetković, D., Simić, S.K.: Towards a spectral theory of graphs based on the signless Laplacian. III. Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 156–166 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. de Lima, L.S., Oliveira, C.S., de Abreu, N.M.M., Nikiforov, V.: The smallest eigenvalue of the signless Laplacian. Linear Algebra Appl. 435(10), 2570–2584 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Desai, M., Rao, V.: A characterization of the smallest eigenvalue of a graph. J. Graph Theory 18(2), 181–194 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Fallat, S., Fan, Y.-Z.: Bipartiteness and the least eigenvalue of signless Laplacian of graphs. Linear Algebra Appl. 436(9), 3254–3267 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Frosini, A., Nivat, M.: Binary matrices under the microscope: a tomographical problem. Theor. Comput. Sci. 370(1–3), 201–217 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Frosini, A., Nivat, M., Rinaldi, S.: Scanning integer matrices by means of two rectangular windows. Theoretical Comput. Sci. 406(1–2), 90–96 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Godsil, C., Royle, G.F.: Algebraic Graph Theory. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gritzmann, P., Langfeld, B., Wiegelmann, M.: Uniqueness in discrete tomography: three remarks and a corollary. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 25(4), 1589–1599 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Herman, G.T., Kuba, A.: Discrete Tomography: Foundations, Algorithms, and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kirkland, S., Paul, D.: Bipartite subgraphs and the signless Laplacian matrix. Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 1–13 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nivat, M.: Sous-ensembles homogénes de z2 et pavages du plan. Comptes Rendus Mathematique 335(1), 83–86 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toni Böhnlein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bar-Noy, A., Böhnlein, T., Lotker, Z., Peleg, D., Rawitz, D. (2021). Weighted Microscopic Image Reconstruction. In: Bureš, T., et al. SOFSEM 2021: Theory and Practice of Computer Science. SOFSEM 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12607. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67731-2_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67731-2_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67730-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67731-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics