Skip to main content

Work in Progress: Designing an Academical Online Course for Technical Students: Structure, Content, Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Educating Engineers for Future Industrial Revolutions (ICL 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1328))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Distant education and online courses have recently become a part of a new reality, especially in the last four months as many institutes and universities all over the world had to shift most of their educational content online because of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. It appeared that some higher educational institutions and a certain part of their students were almost ready to go online as these institutions had been developing their online platforms thus integrating traditional face-to-face classes with computer-assisted learning as well as integrating massive open or shared online courses into their curricular. At the same time, many other universities and institutes proved to be absolutely unprepared to shift online as they and their students had neither their own educational environment and online resources developed by their teaching staff nor any experience of working in an external online environment and choosing courses appropriate for their educational purposes. It turned out that most existing online courses could not be successfully used for implementing into most universities curricula and for teaching a majority of technical students as they simply reproduced the traditional classroom learning process and missed all advantages and opportunities afforded by online learning environments. The authors objective for this research in progress is to identify the key features and describe structure, content and assessment specifics of an academical online course for technical students. This paper provides tips on how to organize the course content into a proper structure stressing what types of teaching materials could be uploaded to the educational platform and goes into its assessment specifics. In a long-term perspective the authors aim to design, develop and introduce a modern and progressive constructivist learning environment for teaching business English in technical universities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Biggs, J., Tang, C.: Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, Maidenhead (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Browne, T., Jenkins, M.: Achieving academic engagement? The landscape for educational technology support in two UK institutions. In: Proceedings ascilite Melbourne 2008 (2008). http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/browne.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2020

  3. Chao, L.: Utilizing Open Source Tools for Online Teaching and Learning: Applying Linux Technologies. Information Science Reference, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clardy, A.: Distant, on-line education: effects, principles and practices. Distance, On-line Education, 1 (2009). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED506182.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2020

  5. Grandzol, C.J., Grandzol, J.R.: Best Practices for Online Business education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(1), (2006). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/246. Accessed 22 May 2020

  6. Guo, P., Kim, J., Rubin, R.: How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos. In: Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239 (2014)

  7. Harasim, L.: Shift happens: online education as a new paradigm in learning. Int. Higher Educ. 3(1–2), 4–61 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00032-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, H.: Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. British J. Educ. Technol. 33(1), 27–37 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Joksimovic, S, Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V.: The history and state of online learning. In: Preparing for the digital university: a review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning. Chapter 4. Athabasca University, pp. 93–131 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lynch, M.M.: The Online Educator: A Guide to Creating the Virtual Classroom. Routledge Falmer, London (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Martín-García, A.V.: Blended Learning: Convergence between Technology and Pedagogy. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Order# 397 issued by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (March 14, 2020). https://www.minobrnauki.gov.ru/ru/documents/card/?id_4=1064&cat=/ru/documents/docs/ Accessed 18 May 2020

  13. Osipovskaya, E., Miakotnikova, S.: Using gamification in teaching public relations students. In: Auer, M., Tsiatsos, T. (eds.) The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education. ICL 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 916, pp. 685–696. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_64

  14. Prince, M.: Does Active learning work? a review of the research. J. Eng. Educ. 93, 223–231 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Francis, R.: Implementing a university e-learning strategy: Levers for change within academic schools. Res. Learn. Technol. 14(2), 135–151 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v14i2.10952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Germain, E, S.: ‘Five Common Pitfalls of Online Course Design’, in Faculty Focus [website] (2011). www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/five-common-pitfalls-of-online-course-design. Accessed 15 May 2020

  17. Taylor, J.C.: Fifth generation distance education. Presented at the keynote address delivered at the iCDe 20th World Conference, Dusseldorf, Germany (2001). http://www.usq.edu.au/users/taylorj/conferences.htm. Accessed 22 May 2020

  18. Trentin, G.: Designing online courses. In: Maddux, C.D., Johnson, D.L. (eds.) The Web in Higher Education: Assessing the Impact and Fulfilling the Potential, The Haworth Press Inc., New York, London, Oxford, pp. 47–66. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tripathi, P., Mukerji, S. (eds.): Handbook of Research on Technology-Centric Strategies for Higher Education (Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership). IGI Global, Hershey (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Makeeva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Makeeva, E., Lopukhova, J., Gorlova, E. (2021). Work in Progress: Designing an Academical Online Course for Technical Students: Structure, Content, Assessment. In: Auer, M.E., Rüütmann, T. (eds) Educating Engineers for Future Industrial Revolutions. ICL 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1328. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68198-2_63

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics