Skip to main content

Closed-Loop Active Model Diagnosis Using Bhattacharyya Coefficient: Application to Automated Visual Inspection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1351))

  • 2369 Accesses

Abstract

This manuscript presents an improvement of state-of-the-art Closed-Loop Active Model Diagnosis (CLAMD). The proposed method utilizes weighted Bhattacharyya coefficients evaluated at the vertices of the polytopic constraint set to provide a good trade-off between computational efficiency and satisfactory input choice for separation of candidate models of a system. A simulation of a dynamical system shows the closed-loop performance not being susceptible to the combination of candidate models. Additionally, the broad applicability of CLAMD is shown by means of a demonstrative application in automated visual inspection. This application involves sequential determination of the optimal object inspection region for the next measurement. As compared to the conventional approach using one full image to recognize handwritten digits from the MNIST dataset, the novel CLAMD-approach needs significantly (up to 78%) less data to achieve similar accuracy.

This project has received funding from the ECSEL Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No 826589. The JU receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, Austria, Hungary, Romania, Sweden and Israel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aryan, P., Sampath, S., Sohn, H.: An overview of non-destructive testing methods for integrated circuit packaging inspection. Sensors 18(7), 1981 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blackmore, L., Williams, B.: Finite horizon control design for optimal discrimination between several models. In: Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 1147–1152 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Box, G.E., Hill, W.J.: Discrimination among mechanistic models. Technometrics 9(1), 57–71 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Gao, Z., Cecati, C., Ding, S.X.: A survey of fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant techniques–part I: fault diagnosis with model-based and signal-based approaches. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62(6), 3757–3767 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heirung, T.A.N., Mesbah, A.: Input design for active fault diagnosis. Ann. Rev. Control 47, 35–50 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hero, A.O., Cochran, D.: Sensor management: past, present, and future. IEEE Sens. J. 11(12), 3064–3075 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hunter, W.G., Reiner, A.M.: Designs for discriminating between two rival models. Technometrics 7(3), 307–323 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.L.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lauri, M.: Sequential decision making under uncertainty for sensor management in mobile robotics. Ph.D. thesis, Tampere University of Technology (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., Haffner, P.: Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86(11), 2278–2324 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lowe, D.G.: Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. 2, 1150–1157 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paulson, J.A., Heirung, T.A.N., Braatz, R.D., Mesbah, A.: Closed-loop active fault diagnosis for stochastic linear systems. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 735–741 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raimondo, D.M., Braatz, R.D., Scott, J.K.: Active fault diagnosis using moving horizon input design. In: 2013 European Control Conference, pp. 3131–3136 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Scott, J.K., Marseglia, G.R., Magni, L., Braatz, R.D., Raimondo, D.M.: A hybrid stochastic-deterministic input design method for active fault diagnosis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 5656–5661 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shen, Q., Yong, S.Z.: Active model discrimination using partition-based output feedback input design. In: 2020 European Control Conference, pp. 712–717 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Škach, J., Punčochář, I., Lewis, F.L.: Optimal active fault diagnosis by temporal-difference learning. In: 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2146–2151 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Škach, J., Straka, O., Punčochář, I.: Efficient active fault diagnosis using adaptive particle filter. In: 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 5732–5738 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Straka, O., Punčochář, I.: Decentralized and distributed active fault diagnosis: multiple model estimation algorithms. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 30(2), 239–249 (2020)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems (2015). https://www.tensorflow.org/

  20. Wald, A.: Sequential Analysis. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York (1947)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Wen, L., Li, X., Gao, L., Zhang, Y.: A new convolutional neural network-based data-driven fault diagnosis method. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 65(7), 5990–5998 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, S., Xu, F., Wang, X., Liang, B.: A novel online active fault diagnosis method based on invariant sets. IEEE Control Syst. Lett. 5(2), 457–462 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeng, R., Wen, Y., Zhao, W., Liu, Y.J.: View planning in robot active vision: a survey of systems, algorithms, and applications. Comput. Vis. Media 6(3), 225–245 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, X.J.: Auxiliary signal design in fault detection and diagnosis. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 134. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, X.J., Zarrop, M.B.: Auxiliary signals for improving on-line fault detection. In: 1988 International Conference on Control, pp. 414–419 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacques Noom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Noom, J., Thao, N.H., Soloviev, O., Verhaegen, M. (2021). Closed-Loop Active Model Diagnosis Using Bhattacharyya Coefficient: Application to Automated Visual Inspection. In: Abraham, A., Piuri, V., Gandhi, N., Siarry, P., Kaklauskas, A., Madureira, A. (eds) Intelligent Systems Design and Applications. ISDA 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1351. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71187-0_60

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics