Skip to main content

Exploring Inertial Sensor Fusion Methods for Direct Ergonomic Assessments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2020)

Abstract

The industrial site, particularly assembly lines, encompass repetitive labour processes which are considered an ergonomic risk factor for the onset of musculoskeletal disorders. Direct assessments methods promote faster ergonomic feedback, supporting the development of sustainable working conditions. This work presents an upper-body motion tracker framework using inertial sensors to provide direct measurements for ergonomics research. An experimental assessment performed by 14 subjects was completed in order to evaluate the joint angle reconstruction of the proposed method while using the measures of an optical motion capture system as reference. This study investigated the results of three distinct complementary sensor fusion techniques, namely the quaternion-based complementary filter, the Mahony filter and the Madgwick filter. Furthermore, foreseeing the possibility of magnetic disturbance in industrial environments, a comparison was conducted between methods that use magnetic data, i.e. 9-axis, and other inertial-based approaches that do not require magnetic information, i.e. 6-axis. A quantitative analysis was performed using two metrics, the cumulative distribution function and the root-mean-square error, hence, providing an evaluation for the different sensor fusion approaches. The overall results suggest that the 9-axis Madgwick filter although noisier presents a more accurate angular reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alam, F., Zhaihe, Z., Jiajia, H.: A comparative analysis of orientation estimation filters using MEMS based IMU. In: 2nd International Conference on Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (ICRSET 2014) (2014). https://doi.org/10.15242/iie.e0314552

  2. Alves, J., Silva, J., Grifo, E., Resende, C., Sousa, I.: Wearable embedded intelligence for detection of falls independently of on-body location. Sensor 19(11) (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19112426

  3. Bancroft, J.B., Lachapelle, G.: Data fusion algorithms for multiple inertial measurement units. Sensors 11(7), 6771–6798 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3390/s110706771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barbour, N., Schmidt, G.: Inertial sensor technology trends. IEEE Sens. J. 1(4), 332–339 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/7361.983473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Battini, D., Persona, A., Sgarbossa, F.: Innovative real-time system to integrate ergonomic evaluations into warehouse design and management. Comput. Ind. Eng. 77, 1–10 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.08.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergmann, J.H., Mayagoitia, R.E., Smith, I.C.: A portable system for collecting anatomical joint angles during stair ascent: a comparison with an optical tracking device. Dyn. Med. 8(1), 1–7 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-5918-8-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brückner, H.P., Spindeldreier, C., Blume, H., Schoonderwaldt, E., Altenmüller, E.: Evaluation of inertial sensor fusion algorithms in grasping tasks using real input data: comparison of computational costs and root mean square error. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, BSN 2012, pp. 189–194 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/BSN.2012.9

  8. Caputo, F., Greco, A., D’Amato, E., Notaro, I., Spada, S.: IMU-based motion capture wearable system for ergonomic assessment in industrial environment. In: Ahram, T.Z. (ed.) AHFE 2018. AISC, vol. 795, pp. 215–225. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94619-1_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Cerqueira, S.M., Da Silva, A.F., Santos, C.P.: Instrument-based ergonomic assessment: a perspective on the current state of art and future trends. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE Portuguese Meeting on Bioengineering, ENBENG 2019, pp. 14–17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ENBENG.2019.8692514

  10. Fera, M., Greco, A., Caterino, M., Gerbino, S., Caputo, F.: Line balancing assessment enhanced by IoT and simulation tools. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT, MetroInd 4.0 and IoT 2019, pp. 84–88 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/METROI4.2019.8792889

  11. Fera, M., et al.: Towards digital twin implementation for assessing production line performance and balancing. Sensors 20(1), 97 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Filippeschi, A., Schmitz, N., Miezal, M., Bleser, G., Ruffaldi, E., Stricker, D.: Survey of motion tracking methods based on inertial sensors: a focus on upper limb human motion. Sensors 17(6), 1–40 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/s17061257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Isusi, I.: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders – facts and figures (syntesis of 10 national reports). European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2020). https://doi.org/10.2802/443890. http://europa.eu

  14. de Kok, J., et al.: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders : prevalence, costs and demographics in the EU. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2019). https://doi.org/10.2802/66947

  15. Kok, M., Hol, J.D., Schön, T.B.: Using inertial sensors for position and orientation estimation. Found. Trends® Sig. Process. 11(1–2), 1–153 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1561/2000000094

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lim, S., D’Souza, C.: A narrative review on contemporary and emerging uses of inertial sensing in occupational ergonomics. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 76, 102937 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102937. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814119305591

  17. Lu, Y.: Industry 4.0: a survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 6, 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Madgwick, S.O., Harrison, A.J., Vaidyanathan, R.: Estimation of IMU and MARG orientation using a gradient descent algorithm. In: IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, pp. 179–185 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975346

  19. Mahony, R., Hamel, T., Pflimlin, J.: Nonlinear complementary filters on the special orthogonal group. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 53(5), 1203–1218 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Peppoloni, L., Filippeschi, A., Ruffaldi, E., Avizzano, C.A.: A novel 7 degrees of freedom model for upper limb kinematic reconstruction based on wearable sensors. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 11th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics, SISY 2013, pp. 105–110 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/SISY.2013.6662551

  21. Pereira, A., Folgado, D., Nunes, F., Almeida, J., Sousa, I.: Using inertial sensors to evaluate exercise correctness in electromyography-based home rehabilitation systems. In: 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), pp. 1–6 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Santos, S.: Explaining the ergonomic assessment of human movement in industrial contexts. Master’s thesis, NOVA School of Science and Technology - FCT NOVA (2019). http://hdl.handle.net/10362/88342

  23. Santos, S., Folgado, D., Rodrigues, J., Mollaei, N., Fujão, C., Gamboa, H.: Explaining the ergonomic assessment of human movement in industrial contexts. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2020), pp. 79–88 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5220/0008953800790088

  24. Teufl, W., Miezal, M., Taetz, B., Frohlichi, M., Bleser, G.: Validity of inertial sensor based 3D joint kinematics of static and dynamic sport and physiotherapy specific movements. PLoS ONE 14(2), 1–18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsao, L., Nussbaum, M.A., Kim, S., Ma, L.: Modelling performance during repetitive precision tasks using wearable sensors: a data-driven approach. Ergonomics 63(7), 831–849 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2020.1759700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vicon Motion Systems: Upper Limb Model. Product Guide (2007). http://www.vicon.com

  27. Vignais, N., Bernard, F., Touvenot, G., Sagot, J.C.: Physical risk factors identification based on body sensor network combined to videotaping. Appl. Ergon. 65, 410–417 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yi, C., et al.: Estimating three-dimensional body orientation based on an improved complementary filter for human motion tracking. Sensors 18(11) (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113765

  29. Zhou, H., Hu, H.: Upper limb motion estimation from inertial measurements. Int. J. Inf. Technol. 13, 1–14 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Santos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Santos, S., Folgado, D., Rodrigues, J., Mollaei, N., Fujão, C., Gamboa, H. (2021). Exploring Inertial Sensor Fusion Methods for Direct Ergonomic Assessments. In: Ye, X., et al. Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. BIOSTEC 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1400. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72379-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72379-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72378-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72379-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics