Skip to main content

Comparison of Medical Image Evaluations in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Through Image J

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2020)

Abstract

The objective of the study was to compare the physical characteristics of the diseases of each patient participating in the MRCP exam and to carry out a detailed analysis between the score obtained by the medical evaluation, the averages obtained by the Image J® software curve. Participated in the study 64 patients (31 women, 33 men). Determination of the sequences and the procedure for the patients was defined by two radiologists from the clinic. Thus, they also analyzed the images acquired from the research, called evaluator 1 (E1) and 2 (E2). For this study, the images and scores assigned by E2, obtained with a manufactured contrast were chosen for a subset of 14 patients (21.87%) of 64. 4 being score 2 (100%) (1 woman and 3 men); 5 patients with score 3 (12.82%) (3 women and 2 men) of 39 total; and 5 (23.81%) were score 4 (2 women and 3 men) of 21 total. In the selected images, a line or rectangle was used in the region of the common bile duct. The relevance of this work is in the development of a protocol applied to available software for the identification of diseases through changes in average values of gray levels in chosen regions of organs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mazzola, A.A.: Magnetic resonance: principles of image formation and applications in functional imaging. Revista Brasileira de Física Médica 3(1), 117–129 (2009). https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2009.v3.n1.p117-129

  2. Westbrook, C., Roth, C.K., Talbot, J.: MRI in Practice. 4th edn. Wiley Black Well (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pinheiro, Y.L.S., Costa, R.Z.V., Pinho, K.E.P., Ferreira, R.R., Schuindt, S.M.: Effects of iodinated contrast agent, xylocaine and gadolinium concentration on the signal emitted in magnetic resonance arthrography: a samples study. Radiologia Brasileira 48(2), 69–73 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2013.0002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morita, S., et al.: Prospective comparative study of negative oral contrast agents for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Jpn. J. Radiol. 28(2), 117–122 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-009-0395-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghanaati, H., Yazdi, H.R., Jallati, A.H., Abahashemi, F., Shakiba, M., Firouznia, K.: Improvent of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) images after black tea consumption. Eur. Radiol. 21, 2551–2557 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2217-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, B., et al.: Coronal 2D MR cholangiography overestimates the length of the right hepatic duct in liver transplantation donors. Eur. Radiol. 27(5), 1822–1830 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4572-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pinho, K.E.P., Pinho, A.C., PisanI, J.C., Goedert, C.A., Gusso, A.M., Gewehr, P.M.: Açai juice as contrast agent in MRCP exams: qualitative and quantitative image evaluation. Br. Arch. Biol. Technol. 62, e19160697 (2019). Epub 13-Maio-2019. ISSN 1516-8913. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2019160697

  8. Terese Winslow Intrahepatic Bile Duct Anatomy for the National Cancer Institute (2015). Terese Winslow LLC https://www.teresewinslow.com/#/digestion/. Accessed 03 June 2020

  9. Leyendecker, J.R., Brown, J.J., Merkle, E.M.: Abdominal & Pelvic MRI. 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Philadelphia (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sanchez, T.A., et al.: Clinical Feasibility of açaí (Euterpe olerácea) pulp as an oral contrast agent for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 23(5), 666–670 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e31819012a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frisch, A., Walter, T.G., Griezer, C., Geisel, D., Hamm, B., Denecke, T.: Performance survey on a new standardized formula for oral signal suppression in MRCP. Eur. J. Radiol. Open 5, 1–5 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2017.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pinho, K.E.P., Pinho, A.C., Gewehr, P.M., Gusso, A.M., Goedert, C.A.: Image evaluation in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography. In: BIOSTEC 2020 13th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. Proceedings, vol. 4, Biosignals pp. 98–105 (2020). https://www.biostec.org. Accessed 04 June 2020

  13. Souza, V.B., Federizzi, M., Fernandes, D., Franco, A.R.: Avaliação quantitativa da qualidade de exame de imagem por ressonância magnética nuclear. In: XXIV Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia Biomédica [internet] (2014). https://www.canal6.com.br/cbeb/2014/artigos/cbeb2014_submission_375.pdf

  14. Rocha, N.K.S., Pinho, K.E.P.: Verificação das Imagens de Colangiopancreatografia por Ressonância Magnética com uso de Suco Natural. In: XIX Seminário de Iniciação Científica e Tecnológica, Medianeira. SICITE. UTFPR (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pinho, K.E.P., Pinho, A.C., Gewehr, P.M., Gusso, A.M.: Image quality in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography exams: study between Açai Juice and a manufactured contrast agent. In: Costa-Felix, R., Machado, J.C., Alvarenga, A.V. (eds.) XXVI Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. IP, vol. 70/2, pp. 259–264. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2517-5_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Pinho, K.E.P., Gewehr, P.M., Pinho, A.C., Pisani, J.C.: Sucos naturais como agentes de contraste para exames de colangiopancreatografia por ressonância magnética. In: XXIV Congresso de Engenharia Biomédica[internet], pp. 1685–1688 (2014). https://www.canal6.com.br/cbeb/2014/artigos/cbeb2014_submission_499.pdf

  17. Sasani, H., Kayhan, A., Sasani, M.E., Sasani, M.A.: Signal analysis of pineapple according to its anatomical region in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: which region is most effective in suppressing gastric fluid signal? Biomed. Res. 28(11), 5167–5171 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fukukura, Y., Fujiyoshi, F., Sasaki, M., Nakajo, M.: Pancreatic duct: morphologic evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 222, 674–680 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2223010684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marques, P.M.A., Caritá, E.C., Benedicto, A.A., Sanches, P.R.: Integração RIS/PACS no Hospital das Clínicas de Ribeirão Preto: Uma solução baseada em “web.” Radiologia Brasileira 38(1), 37–43 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842005000100009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Duarte, J.A., Furtado, A.P.A., Marroni, C.A.: Use of pineapple juice with gadopentetate dimeglumine as a negative oral contrast for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a multicentric study. Abdom. Imaging 37, 447–456 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9761-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Image J. https://imagej.nih.gov. Accessed 12 May 2020

  22. Weber, J.F., Santos, A.L.F.: Utilização do software ImageJ para avaliar área de lesão dermonecrótica. Revista de Saúde Digital e Tecnologias Educacionais 4(1), 120–130 (2019). https://periodicos.ufc.br/resdite/index. Accessed 27 Jan 2020

  23. Ferreira, T., Rasband, W.: ImageJ user Guide IJ 1.46r. 2019. https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/docs/guide/user-guide.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2019

  24. Brianezi, G., Camargo, J.L.V., Miot, H.A.: Development and validation of a quantitative image analysis method to evaluate comet assay (silver staining). J. Bras. Patol. Med. Lab. 45(4), 325–334 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-24442009000400010

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

To Araucaria Foundation from Parana State, for providing research support through project number 355/2012.

For the Hospital, Clinic and the patients who did their best to help in this study.

To Terese Winslow LLC for permission to use the anatomical image extrahepatic bile duct anatomy 06/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. E. P. Pinho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pinho, K.E.P., Gewehr, P.M., Pinho, A.C., Milhoretto, E., Gusso, A.M., Goedert, C.A. (2021). Comparison of Medical Image Evaluations in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Through Image J. In: Ye, X., et al. Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. BIOSTEC 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1400. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72379-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72379-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72378-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72379-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics