Skip to main content

Comparison of TCP Congestion Control Performance over a Satellite Network

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Passive and Active Measurement (PAM 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCCN,volume 12671))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

While satellite Internet bitrates have increased, latency can still degrade TCP performance. Realistic assessment of TCP over satellites is lacking, typically done by simulation or emulation, if at all. This paper presents experiments comparing four TCP congestion control algorithms – BBR, Cubic, Hybla and PCC – on a commercial satellite network. Analysis shows similar steady state bitrates for all, but with significant differences in start-up throughputs and round-trip times caused by queuing of packets in flight. Power analysis combining throughput and latency shows during steady state, PCC is the most powerful, due to relatively high throughputs and consistent, relatively low round-trip times, while for small downloads Hybla is the most powerful, due to fast throughput ramp-ups. BBR generally fares similarly to Cubic in both cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.compiralabs.com/.

  2. 2.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ViaSat-2.

  3. 3.

    http://perform.wpi.edu/downloads/#udp.

  4. 4.

    https://software.es.net/iperf/.

References

  1. Arun, V., Balakrishnan, H.: Copa: practical delay-based congestion control for the Internet. In: Proceedings of the Applied Networking Research Workshop, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  2. Association, S.I.: Introduction to the satellite industry (2020). https://tinyurl.com/y5m7z77e

  3. Barakat, C., Chaher, N., Dabbous, W., Altman, E.: Improving TCP/IP over geostationary satellite links. In: Proceedings of GLOBECOM. Rio de Janeireo, Brazil, December 1999

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caini, C., Firrincieli, R.: TCP Hybla: a TCP enhancement for heterogeneous networks. Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw. 22(5), 547–566 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cao, Y., Jain, A., Sharma, K., Balasubramanian, A., Gandhi, A.: When to use and when not to use BBR: an empirical analysis and evaluation study. In: Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), Amsterdam, NL, October 2019

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cardwell, N., Cheng, Y., Yeganeh, S.H., Jacobson, V.: BBR congestion control. IETF Draft draft-cardwell-iccrg-bbr-congestion-control-00, July 2017

    Google Scholar 

  7. Che, X., Ip, B., Lin, L.: A survey of current Youtube video characteristics. IEEE Multimedia 22(2), 56–63 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cisco: Interface and Hardware Component Configuration Guide, Cisco IOS Release 15M&T. Cisco Systems, Inc. (2015). chapter: Rate Based Satellite Control Protocol

    Google Scholar 

  9. Claypool, S., Claypool, M., Chung, J., Li, F.: Sharing but not caring - performance of TCP BBR and TCP CUBIC at the network bottleneck. In: Proceedings of the 15th IARIA Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications (AICT), Nice, France, August 2019

    Google Scholar 

  10. Data and analysis: webpages are getting larger every year, and here’s why it matters. Solar Winds Pingdom, 15 November 2018. https://tinyurl.com/y4pjrvhl,

  11. Dong, M., Li, Q., Zarchy, D., Godfrey, P.B., Schapira, M.: PCC: re-architecting congestion control for consistent high performance. In: Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), Oakland, CA, USA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dong, M., et al.: PCC Vivace: online-learning congestion control. In: Proceedings of the 15th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI), Renton, WA, USA, April 2018

    Google Scholar 

  13. Everts, T.: The average web page is 3 MB. how much should we care? Speed Matters Blog, 9th August 2017. https://speedcurve.com/blog/web-performance-page-bloat/

  14. Floyd, S.: Metrics for the evaluation of congestion control mechanisms. RFC 5166, March 2008

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ha, S., Rhee, I., Xu, L.: CUBIC: a new TCP-friendly high-speed TCP variant. ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 42(5), 64–74 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cardwell, N., Cheng, Y., Gunn, C.S., Yeganeh, S.H., Jacobson, V.: BBR: congestion-based congestion control. Commun. ACM 60(2), 58–66 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Obata, H., Tamehiro, K., Ishida, K.: Experimental evaluation of TCP-STAR for satellite Internet over WINDS. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems. Tokyo, Japan, March 2011

    Google Scholar 

  18. Utsumi, S., et al.: A new analytical model of TCP Hybla for satellite IP networks. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 124, 137–147 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Y., Zhao, K., Li, W., Fraire, J., Sun, Z., Fang, Y.: Performance Evaluation of QUIC with BBR in Satellite Internet. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Wireless for Space and Extreme Environments (WiSEE), Huntsville, AL, USA, December 2018

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Amit Cohen, Lev Gloukhenki and Michael Schapira of Compira Labs for providing the implementation of PCC. Also, thanks to the anonymous reviewers and shepherd Srikanth Sundaresan for their thoughtful feedback on improving our paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Claypool .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Claypool, S., Chung, J., Claypool, M. (2021). Comparison of TCP Congestion Control Performance over a Satellite Network. In: Hohlfeld, O., Lutu, A., Levin, D. (eds) Passive and Active Measurement. PAM 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12671. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72582-2_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72582-2_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72581-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72582-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics