Skip to main content

Multi-perspective Conformance Checking Applied to BPMN-E2

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends and Applications in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST 2021)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1366))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

One of the most used notations for process modelling is the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), being the expressiveness in representing processes its strongest attribute. However, this notation has shortcomings when dealing with some specific domains (namely Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points systems), struggling to model activity duration, quality control points, activity effects and monitoring nature. For this particular purpose, an extension named Business Process Model and Notation Extended Expressiveness (BPMN-E2) was developed to tackle the limitations found in the original notation. In this paper, a multi-perspective conformance checking algorithm is proposed focusing on detecting non-conformities between an event log and a process model, regarding the information provided by the new elements within BPMN-E2. Despite being based on this new notation, the proposed algorithm can be applied to other process model notations as it follows a two-step approach that starts by converting the model into a directly follows model (annotated with conformance rules), which is then used in the second phase to perform the conformance checking task effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.: Data Science in Action. In: Process Mining, pp. 3–23. Springer, Berlin (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baumgrass, A., Herzberg, N., Meyer, A., Weske, M.: BPMN extension for business process monitoring. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Architect. EMISA 2014, 85–98 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berti, A., van Zelst, S.J., van der Aalst, W.: process mining for python (PM4Py): bridging the gap between process- and data science. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings vol. 2374, pp. 13–16 (May 2019). http://python.orghttp://arxiv.org/abs/1905.06169

  4. Braun, R., Schlieter, H., Burwitz, M., Esswein, W.: BPMN4CP: Design and implementation of a BPMN extension for clinical pathways. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), pp. 9–16. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Leoni, M., Van Der Aalst, W.M.: Aligning event logs and process models for multi-perspective conformance checking: An approach based on integer linear programming. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 8094 LNCS, pp. 113–129 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Leoni, M., Van Der Aalst, W.M.: Data-aware process mining: discovering decisions in processes using alignments. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1454–1461 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Friedenstab, J.P., Janiesch, C., Matzner, M., Muller, O.: Extending BPMN for business activity monitoring. In: 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), pp. 4158–4167. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grupe, F.H., Owrang, M.M.: Data base mining: discovering new knowledge and competitive advantage. Inf. Syst. Manage. 12(4), 26–31 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalenkova, A.A., van der Aalst, W.M., Lomazova, I.A., Rubin, V.A.: Process mining using BPMN: relating event logs and process models. Softw. Syst. Model. 16(4), 1019–1048 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leemans, S.J., Poppe, E., Wynn, M.T.: Directly follows-based process mining: exploration & a case study. In: Proceedings - 2019 International Conference on Process Mining, ICPM 2019, pp. 25–32 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ly, L.T., Rinderle-Ma, S., Knuplesch, D., Dadam, P.: Monitoring business process compliance using compliance rule graphs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 7044 LNCS (PART 1), pp. 82–99 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Moura, L., Bjørner, N.: Z3: An Efficient SMT Solver. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 337–340. Springer-Verlag (2008), http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-78800-3_24

  13. Musa, A., Gunasekaran, A., Yusuf, Y.: Supply chain product visibility: methods, systems and impacts. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(1), 176–194 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramos-Merino, M., Santos-Gago, J.M., Álvarez-Sabucedo, L.M., Alonso-Roris, V.M., Sanz-Valero, J.: BPMN-E2: a BPMN extension for an enhanced workflow description. Softw. Syst. Model. 18(4), 2399–2419 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rodríguez, A., Fernández-Medina, E., Piattini, M.: A BPMN extension for the modeling of security requirements in business processes. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 90(4), 745–752 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Saeedi, K., Zhao, L., Sampaio, P.R.F.: Extending BPMN for supporting customer-facing service quality requirements. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), pp. 616–623. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sebastiani, R., Armando, A., Barrett, C., Bozzano, M., Bruttomesso, R., Cimatti, A., Franzen, A., De Moura, L., Ghilardi, S., Griggio, A., Krstic, S., Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A., Ranise, S., Roveri, M., Strichman, O., Tacchella, A., Tinelli, C.: Lazy satisfiability modulo theories important discussions with. J. Satisfiability Boolean Model. Comput. 3, 141–224 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Der Aalst, W., Adriansyah, A., De Medeiros, A.K.A., et al.: Process mining manifesto. In: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. vol. 99 LNBIP, pp. 169–194 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, K., Chai, Y., Yang, S.X., Weng, D.: Pre-warning analysis and application in traceability systems for food production supply chains. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(3), 2500–2507 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work has been supported by FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia – within the R&D Units Project Scope: UIDB/00319/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Calheno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Calheno, R., Carvalho, P., Rito Lima, S., Henriques, P.R., Ramos-Merino, M. (2021). Multi-perspective Conformance Checking Applied to BPMN-E2. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Dzemyda, G., Moreira, F., Ramalho Correia, A.M. (eds) Trends and Applications in Information Systems and Technologies . WorldCIST 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1366. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72651-5_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics