Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Systematic Review of Risk Management in System Dynamics Project and Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends and Applications in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST 2021)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1368))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 802 Accesses

Abstract

The objective is to analyze how the literature related to risk management in projects using System Dynamics deals with the causal relationships between risk factors in order to assist the project manager. It concludes with considerations about the use of System Dynamics in the effective management of risks in projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lyneis, J.M., Coopera, K.G., Elsa, S.A.: Strategic management of complex projects: a case study using system dynamics - Syst. Dyn. Rev. 17, 237–260 (2001). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/doi?DOI=10.1002/sdr.213

  2. Gomes, O.O.: Dinâmica de Sistemas como Método de Gestão de Riscos: Aplicação na Gestão de Riscos em Recursos Hídricos / Oseias Oliveira Gomes; orientador Ricardo Matos Chaim. – Brasília (2018). https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/34150

  3. de Sousa, M.R., Ribeiro, A.L.P.: Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic studies: a tutorial Arq. Bras. Cardiol. vol.92 no. 3 São Paulo march (2009). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2009000300013

  4. Sampaio, R.F., Mancini, M.C.: Systematic review studies: a guide for careful synthesis of scientific evidence. Rev. Bras. Physiotherapy 11(1) (2007). https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552007000100013

  5. Lyneis, J.M., Ford, D.N.: System dynamics applied to project management: a survey, assessment, and directions for future research. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 23(2/3) (2007). Summer/Fall 2007 - Publicado online na Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.377

  6. Bernstein, P.L.: Desafio aos deuses: A fascinante história do Risco. Editora Alta Books (2018). ISBN 978–8550802732

    Google Scholar 

  7. PMI - Practice Standard for Project Risk Management (PMBOK®). Four Edition (English) Project Management Institute, 2009. ©2009 Project Management Institute, Inc. ISBN: 978–1–933890–38–8. 2009

    Google Scholar 

  8. Forrester, J.W.: System Dynamics and the Lessons of 35 Years, Relatório Técnico D4224–4. MIT System Dynamics Group, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sterman, J.D.: Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York (2000). ISBN 007238915X

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goh, Y.M., Love, P.E.D., Brown, H., Spickett, J.: “Organizational accidents: a systemic model of production versus protection. J. Manage. Stud. 49(1), 52–76 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00959.x

  11. Morecroft, J.D.W.: Strategic Modelling and Business Dynamics: A Feedback Systems Approach, 2nd edn. Wiley (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119176831

  12. Mahato, B.K., Ogunlana, S.O.: Conflict dynamics in a dam construction project: a case study. Built Environment Project Asset Manage. 1(2), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/20441241111180424

  13. Ogunlana, S.O., Li, H., Sukhera, F.A.: System dynamics approach to exploring performance enhancement in a construction organization. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 129(5), 528–536 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:5(528)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu, P.-F., Ray, S., Li-Hsieh, Y.-Y.: Examining cloud computing adoption intention, pricing mechanism, and deployment model. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 34(4), 474–488 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Walterbusch, M., Martens, B., Teuteberg, F.: Evaluating cloud computing services from a total cost of ownership perspective. Manage. Res. Rev. 36(6), 613–638 (2013). https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01409171311325769/full/html

  16. PMI. Guia do Conhecimento em Gerenciamento de Projetos (GUIA PMBOK®). Fifth Edition (English Project Management Institute (2013). ISBN 978193589679

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zwikael, O., Ahn, M.: A Eficácia da Gestão de Riscos: Uma Análise do Projeto Risk Planejamento entre Indústrias e Países. Análise de Risco 31(1), 25–37 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01470.x

  18. Sanchez, H., et al.: A avaliaçãode risco aplicada a projetos, programas e portfólios. Int. J. Manag. Projects Bus. 2(1), 14–35 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1108/17538370910930491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fang, C.; Marle, F.: Um modelo de rede de risco baseado em simulação para suporte de decisão em gerenciamento de risco de projetos. Sistemas de Apoio à Decisão 52(3), 635–644 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.021

  20. Veiga, E.S.D, Silva, E.M.: A systematic review of risk management in projects. Revista Produção Online. Florianópolis, SC, 20(3), 837–857 (2020). Associacao Brasileira de Engenharia de Producao - ABEPRO. https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v20i3.3636

  21. Thamhain, H.: Gerenciando Riscos em Projetos Complexos. Project Manage. J. 44(2), 20–35 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kerzner, H., Saladis, F.P.: Gerenciamento avançado do portfólio de projetos e o PMO: Multiplicando o ROI em velocidade de dobra. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, M.T., Chou, H.Y.: Alocação de risco e tratamento de riscos de projetos rodoviários em Taiwan. J. Manage. Eng. 19(2), 60–68 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2003)19:2(60)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shenhar, A.J.: Um tamanho não se encaixa em todos os projetos: Explorando domínios clássicos de contingência. Ciência da Gestão 47(3), 394–414 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.3.394.9772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Marcelino-Sádaba, S., et al.: Metodologia de gerenciamento de riscos de projetos para pequenas empresas. Int. J. Project Manage. 32(2), 327–340 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.009

  26. Levitt, R.E., Thomsen, J., Christiansen, T.R., Kunz, J.C., Jin, Y., Nass, C.: Simulando processos de trabalho de projetos e organizações: Em direção a uma teoria de micro-contingência do design organizacional. Ciência da Gestão 45(11), 1479–1495 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.11.1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ackermann, F., Eden, C., Williams, T.: Modelagem para litígio: Mistura de abordagens qualitativas e quantitativas. Interfaces 27(2), 48–65 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.27.2.48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eden, C.E., Williams, T.M., Ackermann, F.A.: Desmantelamento da curva de aprendizagem: O papel das interrupções no planejamento de projetos de desenvolvimento. Int. J. Project Manage. 16(3), 131–138 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00053-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eden, C.E., Williams, T.M., Ackermann, F.A., Howick, S.: Sobre a natureza de disrupção e atraso (D&D) em grandes projetos. Revista da Sociedade de Pesquisa Operacional 51(3), 291–300 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gil, A.C.: Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa Social. 7. ed. Atlas, São Paulo (2019). ISBN 978–85–970–2098–4

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lakatos, E.M., Marconi, M.A.: Fundamentos de Metodologia Científica. 8. ed. Atlas, São Paulo (2017). ISBN 978–85–970–1076–3

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lyneis, J.M., Ford, D.N.: System dynamics applied to project management: a survey, assessment, and directions for future research. Syst. Dyn. Rev. [S.L.], 23(2–3), 157–189 (2007). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.377. Disponível em: /https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sdr.377. Acesso em: 08 Nov 2020

  33. Lyneis, J.M., Cooper, K.G., Els, S.A.: Strategic management of complex projects: a case study using system dynamics. Syst. Dyn. Rev. [S.L.], 17(3), 237–260 (2001). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.213. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sdr.213. Acesso em: 08 Nov. 2020.

  34. Martins Júnior, J.: Como Escrever Trabalhos de Conclusão de Curso. 7. ed. Vozes, Petrópolis (2013). ISBN 978–85–326–3603–4

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sterman, J.D.: System Dynamics Modeling for Project Management. 1992. Disponível em: https://web.mit.edu/jsterman/www/SDG/project.pdf. Acesso em: 09 Nov 2020

  36. Rodney, E., et al.: Uma abordagem de gestão integrada dos riscos do projeto e do projeto. IFACPapersOnLine 48(3), 535–540 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.136

  37. Francês, S., Maule, J., Papamichail, N.: Comportamento de decisão, análise e suporte. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609947

  38. Breysse, D., et al.: Gestão de riscos de projetos em projetos de construção: desenvolvimento de ferramentas de modelagem para favorecer uma abordagem multidisciplinar. Em: Segurança, Confiabilidade, Risco e Ciclo de Vida Performance de estruturas e infraestruturas Safety, Reliability, Risk and Life-Cycle Per. Deodatis, Ellingwood e Frangopol (2013). ISBN 978–1–315–88488–2

    Google Scholar 

  39. Grimaldi, S., e al.: Uma estrutura para selecionar técnicas que suportem o gerenciamento de riscos de projetos. InTech, Rijeka (2012). https://doi.org/10.5772/50991

  40. Bannerman, P.L.: Gestão de riscos e riscos em projetos de software: Uma reavaliação. J. Syst. Softw. 81(12), 2118–2133 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.j.jss.2008.03.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Meredith, J.R.: Theory Building através de Métodos Conceituais. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 13(5), 3–11 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579310028120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Raiffa, H.: A orientação prescritiva da tomada de decisão: uma síntese deysis decisório, tomada de decisão comportamental e teoria dos jogos. In: Ríos, S. (ed.). Teoria da Decisão e Análise de Decisões: Tendências e Desafios. Norwell Kluwer Academic Publishers (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1372-4_1

  43. Bertrand, J.W.M., Fransoo, J.C.: Operations management research methodgies using quantitative modeling. Revista Internacional de Operações e Gestão de Produção 22(2), 241–264 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210414338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Da Nóbrega, D.A., Fenner, G., Lima, A.S.: Uma proposta de metodologia de Gestão de Riscos para projetos de tecnologia da informação. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 12(4), 643–656 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2014.6868866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Forrester, J.W.: Industrial dynamics. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 48(10), 1037–1041 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ghosh, A.: Dynamic Systems for Everyone. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43943-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. Sterman, J.D., Bayer, S.: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Management (2000). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210417646

  48. Meier, H., Boßlau, M.: Design and engineering of dynamic business models for industrial product-service systems. In: The Philosopher’s Stone for Sustainability, pp. 179–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32847-3_30

  49. Um Guia do Conhecimento em Gerenciamento de Projetos (Guia PMBOK)/Project Management Institute - Sexta edição. | Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, 2017. | Série: Guia PMBOK |©2017 Todos os direitos reservados ISBN: 9781628253924

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pitchaimuthu, S., Thakkar, J.J., Gopal, P.R.C.: Modelling of risk factors for defence aircraft industry using interpretive structural modelling, interpretive ranking process and system dynamics. Measur. Bus. Excell. [S.L.] 23(3), 217–239 (2019). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-05-2018-0028. Disponível em: https://doi-org.ez54.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1108/MBE-05-2018-0028. Acesso em: 21 Nov 2020

  51. Xu, Y., Chan, A.P., Xia, B., Qian, Q.K., Liu, Y., Peng, Y.: Fatores críticos de risco que afetam a implementação de projetos de desperdício de energia PPP na China. Energia Aplicada 158, 403-411 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wideman, M.R.: Gerenciamento de Riscos de Projetos e Programas: Um Guia para Gerenciar Riscos e Oportunidadesde Projetos. Project ManagementInstitute, Newtown Square, PA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tah, J.H.M., Thorpe, A., McCaffer, R.: Projeto empreiteiro arrisca a alocação de contingência nosaproximação linguística. Sistemas de Computação em Engenharia 4(2/3), 281–293 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Skorupka, D., Kowacka, M.: Identificação do fator de risco de desenvolvimento de umaoperação de estrada no trabalho de levantamento de luz. Arquivo de Engenharia Civil 60(2), 183–190 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yan, M.-R.; Lee, Y.-H.: Measuring project performance and dynamic risk management for engineering design alliance. Measur. Bus. Excell. [S.L.], 1–22 (2020). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-04-2020-0054. Disponível em: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MBE-04-2020-0054/full/html. Acesso em: 21 Nov 2020

  56. Mhatre, T.N., Thakkar, J.J., Maiti, J.: Modelling critical risk factors for Indian construction project using interpretive ranking process (IRP) and system dynamics (SD). Int. J. Qual. Reliabil. Manage. [S.L.], 34(9), 1451–1473 (2017). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqrm-09-2015-0140. Disponível em: www.emeraldinsight.com/0265-671X.htm. Acesso em: 21 Nov 2020

  57. Lopes, J.S., Braga, J.L., Resende Filho, M.A.: Systems dynamics model for decision support in risk assessment in software projects. J. Software: Evol. Process, [S.L.] 27(12), 976–989 (2015). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1754.Disponívelem: https://doi-org.ez54.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1002/smr.1754. Acesso em: 21 Nov 2020

  58. Boateng, P., Ahiaga-Dagbui, D., Chen, Z., Ogunlana, S.: Modelling Economic Risks in Megaproject Construction: A systemic Approach. In: Proceedings of the 31St Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference, Arcom 2015, Lincoln, 1(1), 115–124 (2015). Disponível em: https://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/archive/2015-ARCOM-Full-Proceedings-Vol-1.pdf. Acesso em: 21 Nov 2020

  59. Cubin, L., Yunqi, L., Shuke, L.: Human resources risk element transmission model of construction project based on system dynamic. Open Cybern. Syst. J. [S.L.], 9(1), 295–305 (2015). Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874110x01509010295. Disponível em: https://benthamopen.com/ABSTRACT/TOCSJ-9-295. Acesso em: 21 Nov 2020.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brasil

    Eliane Cunha Marques, Marcos Vinicius L. Castro, Hilario Luiz Babireski Junior & Ricardo Matos Chaim

Authors
  1. Eliane Cunha Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcos Vinicius L. Castro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hilario Luiz Babireski Junior
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ricardo Matos Chaim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marcos Vinicius L. Castro or Ricardo Matos Chaim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ISEG, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

    Álvaro Rocha

  2. College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Hojjat Adeli

  3. Institute of Data Science and Digital Technologies, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Gintautas Dzemyda

  4. DCT, Universidade Portucalense, Porto, Portugal

    Fernando Moreira

  5. Department of Information Sciences, University of Sheffield, Lisbon, Portugal

    Ana Maria Ramalho Correia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Marques, E.C., Castro, M.V.L., Junior, H.L.B., Chaim, R.M. (2021). A Systematic Review of Risk Management in System Dynamics Project and Techniques. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Dzemyda, G., Moreira, F., Ramalho Correia, A.M. (eds) Trends and Applications in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1368. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72654-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation