Skip to main content

Promotion of Social Participation in Smart City Developments: Six Technologies for Potential Use in Living Labs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends and Applications in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST 2021)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1365))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1240 Accesses

Abstract

With the advancement of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in providing new tools for interaction between citizens and government agents, public participation has been improved, allowing access to a more significant number of participants in the public policy process, and allowing faster and better monitoring of public servants’ initiatives.

These specific ICTs may be seen as generators of information systems, which promote processes and social values among citizens and public agents acting as users. This research is a descriptive one, that presents six cases of technologies for improvement of social participation, and which can be potentially useful for smart city development through institutions termed living labs. The paper describes real cases analyzed under the perspective of information systems, presenting challenges and results aligned to six models of use of ICTs for improvement of social participation, as proposed by [1]. The research collaborates to interpreting the design of smart cities under the perspective of information systems development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fung, A., Russon Gilman, H., Shkabatur, J.: Six models for the internet + politics. Int. Stud. Rev. 15(1), 30–47 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ingram, H., Rathgeb-Smith, S.: Public Policy for Democracy. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pahl-Wostl, C., et al.: From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: Toward adaptive water governance in river basins. Environ. Sci. Policy 23, 24–34 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mukhtarov, F., Dieperink, C., Driessen, P.: The influence of information and communication technologies on public participation in urban water governance: a review of place-based research. Environ. Sci. Policy 89(April), 430–438 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnstein, S.R.: A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 35(4), 216–224 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fung, A.: Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Adm. Rev. 66(SUPPL. 1), 66–75 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Irvin, R.A., Stansbury, J.: Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public Adm. Rev. 64(1), 55–65 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu, J., et al.: Towards a service-dominant platform for public value co-creation in a smart city: evidence from two metropolitan cities in China. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 142(September 2018), 168–182 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pflughoeft, B.R., Schneider, I.E.: Social media as E-participation: can a multiple hierarchy stratification perspective predict public interest? Gov. Inf. Q. 37(1), 101422 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, W., et al.: Connecting with hyperlocal news website: cause or effect of civic participation? Am. Behav. Sci. 62(8), 1022–1041 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V.P., Kulkki, S.: State-of-the-art in utilizing Living Labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation-a European approach. Lulea: Center for Distance-spanning Technology. Lulea University of Technology Sweden: Lulea. Center for Distance-spanning Technology, vol. 1, no. 13, p. 13 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Westerlund, M., Leminen, S.: Managing the challenges of becoming an open innovation company: experiences from living labs. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 1(1), 19–25 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schuurman, D.: Bridging the gap between open and user innovation? Exploring the value of Living Labs as a means to structure user contribution and manage distributed innovation. Dissertation in order to obtain the title of Doctor in the Communication Sciences (2015). https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/5931264/file/5931265.pdf. Accessed mai 2020

  14. Prakken, B.: Information, Organization and Information Systems Design: An Integrated Approach to Information Problems. Springer (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lima, C.: Dados Abertos Governamentais no Contexto Da Ciência Cidadã: O Caso Da “Operação Serenata De Amor”. e-prints in library & information science, p. 15 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rodrigues, J., Fontes, C.: “Operação Serenata de Amor”: a análise de Big Data no combate à festa dos gastos públicos. In: XIV Congreso de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Investigadores de la Comunicación (ALAIC), San Jose, Costa Rica, July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  17. São Paulo. Fab lab livre. O que é. Informação. https://fablablivresp.art.br/o-que-e. Accessed July 2020

  18. Bernardes, M.B.: Democracia na Sociedade Informacional. Saraiva, São Paulo (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mathias, I.R.M.: Orçamento participativo: uma nova abordagem para Belo Horizonte – MG. Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. International Observatory on Participatory Democracy. Best practices in citizen participation, Barcelona (2007). Access: <doc298.pdf (oidp.net)>. Accessed Dec 2020

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bernardes, M.B.: Proposta de Modelagem Regulatória para a Governança Participativa, no Contexto Lusobrasileiro. Universidade do Minho, Portugal (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Decide Madrid. Presupuestos Participativos 2019 (2020). https://decide.madrid.es/presupuestos. Accessed July 2020

  23. Promise Tracker. Monitorando a Cidade. MIT Center for Civic Media. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ionicframework.monitorandoacidade&hl=pt&showAllReviews=true. Accessed July 2020

  24. Martano, A., Reiser, E., Craveiro, G., et al.: Fomentando o Monitoramento Cidadão no Pará Aprendizados de Três Estudos de Caso. Relatório, Maio 2017. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B65ni2sQNdUFbEpWc3RpU19wMzQ/view. Accessed set. 2020

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our thanks to the CNPQ National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (by CNPQ project n. 400278/2020-0 e 350341/2020-6), and also to the JUSGOV- Research Centre for Justice and Governance (supported by National Funds through the FCT -Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology; Project UIDB/05749/2020), and to the Algoritimi Centre; both at University of Minho.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bernardes, M., Andrade, F., Novais, P., Kimura, H., Fernandes, J. (2021). Promotion of Social Participation in Smart City Developments: Six Technologies for Potential Use in Living Labs. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Dzemyda, G., Moreira, F., Ramalho Correia, A.M. (eds) Trends and Applications in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1365. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72657-7_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics