Skip to main content

Election Manipulation on Social Networks with Messages on Multiple Candidates Extended Abstract

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trustworthy AI - Integrating Learning, Optimization and Reasoning (TAILOR 2020)

Abstract

We study the problem of election control through social influence when the manipulator is allowed to use the locations that she acquired on the network for sending both positive and negative messages on multiple candidates, widely extending the previous results available in the literature that study the influence of a single message on a single candidate. In particular, we provide a tight characterization of the settings in which the maximum increase in the margin of victory can be efficiently approximated and of those in which any approximation turns out to be impossible.

This work has been partially supported by the Italian MIUR PRIN 2017 Project ALGADIMAR “Algorithms, Games, and Digital Market”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abouei Mehrizi, M., Corò, F., Cruciani, E., D’Angelo, G.: Election control through social influence with unknown preferences. In: Kim, D., Uma, R.N., Cai, Z., Lee, D.H. (eds.) COCOON 2020. LNCS, vol. 12273, pp. 397–410. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58150-3_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Auletta, V., Caragiannis, I., Ferraioli, D., Galdi, C., Persiano, G.: Minority becomes majority in social networks. In: WINE, pp. 74–88 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Auletta, V., Caragiannis, I., Ferraioli, D., Galdi, C., Persiano, G.: Information retention in heterogeneous majority dynamics. In: WINE, pp. 30–43 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Auletta, V., Caragiannis, I., Ferraioli, D., Galdi, C., Persiano, G.: Robustness in discrete preference games. In: AAMAS, pp. 1314–1322 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Auletta, V., Ferraioli, D., Greco, G.: Reasoning about consensus when opinions diffuse through majority dynamics. In: IJCAI, pp. 49–55 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Auletta, V., Ferraioli, D., Fionda, V., Greco, G.: Maximizing the spread of an opinion when tertium datur EST. In: AAMAS, pp. 1207–1215 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Auletta, V., Ferraioli, D., Greco, G.: On the effectiveness of social proof recommendations in markets with multiple products. In: ECAI, pp. 19–26 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Auletta, V., Ferraioli, D., Savarese, V.: Manipulating an election in social networks through edge addition. In: AI*IA, pp. 495–510 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bredereck, R., Elkind, E.: Manipulating opinion diffusion in social networks. In: IJCAI (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Castiglioni, M., Ferraioli, D., Gatti, N.: Election control in social networks via edge addition or removal. In: AAAI, pp. 1878–1885 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Corò, F., Cruciani, E., D’Angelo, G., Ponziani, S.: Exploiting social influence to control elections based on scoring rules. In: IJCAI, pp. 201–207 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Corò, F., Cruciani, E., D’Angelo, G., Ponziani, S.: Vote for me!: Election control via social influence in arbitrary scoring rule voting systems. In: AAMAS, pp. 1895–1897 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, E.: Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: ACM SIGKDD, pp. 137–146 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Office of The Director of National Intelligence: Background to ‘Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent Elections’: The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sina, S., Hazon, N., Hassidim, A., Kraus, S.: Adapting the social network to affect elections. In: AAMAS, pp. 705–713 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wilder, B., Vorobeychik, Y.: Controlling elections through social influence. In: AAMAS, pp. 265–273 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diodato Ferraioli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Castiglioni, M., Ferraioli, D., Gatti, N., Landriani, G. (2021). Election Manipulation on Social Networks with Messages on Multiple Candidates Extended Abstract. In: Heintz, F., Milano, M., O'Sullivan, B. (eds) Trustworthy AI - Integrating Learning, Optimization and Reasoning. TAILOR 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12641. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73959-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73959-1_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73958-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73959-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics