Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using FITradeoff Method for Supply Selection with Decomposition and Holistic Evaluations for Preference Modelling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decision Support Systems XI: Decision Support Systems, Analytics and Technologies in Response to Global Crisis Management (ICDSST 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 414))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The FITradeoff method is a Flexible and Interactive method used to solve Multi-Criteria Decision Making/Aiding (MCDM/A) problems, with additive aggregation in the context of Multi-Attribute Value Theory. This study discusses the combination of two perspectives of preference modelling in the FITradeoff method for a supply selection decision problem. Five criteria are considered: Price, Product Quality, Delivery Time for supplying, Confidence of the Supplier and Service, associating to the classical objectives of manufacturing and operations strategies. The two perspectives are: the elicitation process by decomposition and the holistic evaluation. The combination of these two perspectives offers flexibility for the decision-maker during the FITradeoff decision process. The FITradeoff is implemented in a Decision Support System, in which the holistic evaluation is performed using graphical and tabular visualizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Almeida, A.T., Almeida, J.A., Costa, A.P.C.S., Almeida-Filho, A.T.: A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250(1), 179–191 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. de Almeida, A.T., Frej, E.A., Roselli, L.R.P.: Combining holistic and decomposition paradigms in preference modeling with the flexibility of FITradeoff. CEJOR 29(1), 7–47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00728-z

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences, and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Belton, V., Stewart, T.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrogott, M.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer, New York (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/b100605

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Frej, E.A., de Almeida, A.T., Costa, A.P.C.S.: Using data visualization for ranking alternatives with partial information and interactive tradeoff elicitation. Oper. Res. Int. J. 19(4), 909–931 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-00444-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang, T.H.A., Frej, E.A., de Almeida, A.T.: Flexible and interactive tradeoff elicitation for multicriteria sorting problems. Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res. 37, 2050020 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Frej, E.A., Ekel, P., de Almeida, A.T.: A benefit-to-cost ratio based approach for portfolio selection under multiple criteria with incomplete preference information. Inf. Sci. 545, 487–498 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Fossile, D.K., Frej, E.A., da Costa, S.E.G., Pinheiro, E., de Lima, A., de Almeida, T.: Selecting the most viable renewable energy source for brazilian ports using the FITradeoff method. J. Clean. Prod. 260, 121107 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang, T.H.A., Júnior, A.M.D.C.S., de Almeida, A.T.: Evaluating electric power generation technologies: a multicriteria analysis based on the FITradeoff method. Energy 165, 10–20 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Macedo, P.P., de Miranda Mota, C.M., Sola, A.V.H.: Meeting the Brazilian energy efficiency law: a flexible and interactive multicriteria proposal to replace non-efficient motors. Sustain. Urban Areas 41, 822–832 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Santos, I.M., Roselli, L.R.P., da Silva, A.L.G., Alencar, L.H.: A supplier selection model for a wholesaler and retailer company based on FITradeoff multicriteria method. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020, 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8796282

  13. Frej, E.A., Roselli, L.R.P., Araújo de Almeida, J., de Almeida, A.T.: A multicriteria decision model for supplier selection in a food industry based on FITradeoff method. Math. Probl. Eng. 2017, 1–9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4541914

  14. Carrillo, P.A.A., Roselli, L.R.P., Frej, E.A., de Almeida, A.T.: Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method. Ann. Oper. Res. 1–16 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dell’Ovo, M., Oppio, A., Capolongo, S.: Decision Support System for the Location of Healthcare Facilities: SitHealth Evaluation Tool. PoliMI SpringerBriefs, 1st edn, vol. XII, pp. 121. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50173-0

  16. Camara e Silva, L., Daher, S.D.F.D., Santiago, K.T.M., Costa, A.P.C.S.: Selection of an integrated security area for locating a state military police station based on MCDM/A method. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 1530–1534, October 2019

    Google Scholar 

  17. Camilo, D.G.G., de Souza, R.P., Frazão, T.D.C., da Costa Junior, J.F.: Multi-criteria analysis in the health area: selection of the most appropriate triage system for the emergency care units in natal. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 20(1), 1–16 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pergher, I., Frej, E.A., Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T.: Integrating simulation and FITradeoff method for scheduling rules selection in job-shop production systems. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 227, 107669 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Silva, M.M., de Gusmão, A.P.H., de Andrade, C.T.A., Silva, W.: The integration of VFT and FITradeoff multicriteria method for the selection of WCM projects. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 1513–1517. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lima, E.S., Viegas, R.A., Costa, A.P.C.S.: A multicriteria method based approach to the BPMM selection problem. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 3334–3339. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Monte, M.B.S., Morais, D.C.: A decision model for identifying and solving problems in an urban water supply system. Water Resour. Manag. 33(14), 4835–4848 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02401-w

  22. e Gusmao, A.P.H., Pereira Medeiros, C.: A model for selecting a strategic information system using the FITradeoff. Math. Probl. Eng. 2016, 1–7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7850960

  23. Weber, M., Borcherding, K.: Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multi-attribute decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 67, 1–2 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Silva A.L.C.L, Costa, A.P.C.S., de Almeida, A.T.: Exploring cognitive aspects of FITradeoff method using neuroscience tools. Ann. Oper. Res. 1–23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03894-0

  25. de Almeida, A.T., Roselli, L.R.P.: NeuroIS to improve the FITradeoff decision-making process and decision support system. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A.B., Fischer, T. (eds.) NeuroIS 2020. LNISO, vol. 43, pp. 111–120. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60073-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Reis Peixoto Roselli, L., de Almeida, A.T.: Analysis of graphical visualizations for multi-criteria decision making in FITradeoff method using a decision neuroscience experiment. In: Moreno-Jiménez, J.M., Linden, I., Dargam, F., Jayawickrama, U. (eds.) ICDSST 2020. LNBIP, vol. 384, pp. 30–42. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46224-6_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T.: Improvements in the FITradeoff decision support system for ranking order problematic based in a behavioral study with NeuroIS tools. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A.B., Fischer, T. (eds.) NeuroIS 2020. LNISO, vol. 43, pp. 121–132. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60073-0_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T., Frej, E.A.: Decision neuroscience for improving data visualization of decision support in the FITradeoff method. Oper. Res. Int. J. 19(4), 933–953 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-00445-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roselli, L.R.P., Pereira, L., da Silva, A., de Almeida, A.T., Morais, D.C., Costa, A.P.C.S.: Neuroscience experiment applied to investigate decision-maker behavior in the tradeoff elicitation procedure. Ann. Oper. Res. 289(1), 67–84 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03394-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Carneiro de Lima da Silva, A.L., Cabral Seixas Costa, A.P.: FITradeoff decision support system: an exploratory study with neuroscience tools. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A., Fischer, T. (eds.) Information Systems and Neuroscience. LNISO, vol. 32, pp. 365–372. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28144-1_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Roselli, L.R.P., Frej, E.A., de Almeida, A.T.: Neuroscience experiment for graphical visualization in the FITradeoff decision support system. In: Chen, Ye., Kersten, G., Vetschera, R., Xu, H. (eds.) GDN 2018. LNBIP, vol. 315, pp. 56–69. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92874-6_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. de Almeida, A.T., Roselli, L.R.P.: Visualization for decision support in FITradeoff method: exploring its evaluation with cognitive neuroscience. In: Linden, I., Liu, S., Colot, C. (eds.) ICDSST 2017. LNBIP, vol. 282, pp. 61–73. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57487-5_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Chai, J., Liu, J., Ngai, E.: Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(10), 3872–3885 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xia, W., Wu, Z.: Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments. Omega 35, 494–504 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Barla, S.B.: A case study of supplier selection for lean supply by using a mathematical model. Logist. Inf. Manag. 16, 451–459 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Slack, N., Lewis, M.: Operations Strategy. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hill, T.: Operations Management – Strategy Context and Managerial Analysis, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hill, T.: Manufacturing Strategy, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work had partial support from the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq).and FACEPE (Foundation for Research in the State of Pernambuco). Grant Nos. APQ-0484-3.08/17, APQ-0370-3.08/14.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Decision Systems and Information Development (CDSID), Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil

    Lucia Reis Peixoto Roselli & Adiel Teixeira de Almeida

Authors
  1. Lucia Reis Peixoto Roselli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adiel Teixeira de Almeida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucia Reis Peixoto Roselli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

    Uchitha Jayawickrama

  2. International Hellenic University, Kavala, Greece

    Pavlos Delias

  3. University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

    María Teresa Escobar

  4. University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Jason Papathanasiou

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T. (2021). Using FITradeoff Method for Supply Selection with Decomposition and Holistic Evaluations for Preference Modelling. In: Jayawickrama, U., Delias, P., Escobar, M.T., Papathanasiou, J. (eds) Decision Support Systems XI: Decision Support Systems, Analytics and Technologies in Response to Global Crisis Management. ICDSST 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 414. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73976-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73976-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73975-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73976-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation