Skip to main content

Methodology for Multi-aspect Ontology Development

Use Case of DSS Based on Human-Machine Collective Intelligence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decision Support Systems XI: Decision Support Systems, Analytics and Technologies in Response to Global Crisis Management (ICDSST 2021)

Abstract

The lack of interoperability observed in modern DSSs becomes even greater when complex systems covering multiple domains are considered. In the present research, the apparatus of multi-aspect ontologies is used as a means to represent knowledge of DSSs based on human-machine collective intelligence for enabling interoperability between the system components and coordinate interrelated processes. The available ontology development methodologies are not quite suitable for the development of multi-aspect ontologies because they leave aside the problem of choosing approaches for integration of reusable ontologies. Since the structure of a multi-aspect ontology imposes some restrictions on the aspects integration, the objective of this research is to propose a methodology for the development of multi-aspect ontologies that incorporates an aspects integration approach. For the research purpose, the existing ontology development methodologies have been analyzed and an ontology development pattern followed by most methodologies has been revealed. The developed four-stage methodology extends it with an aspects integration approach. The methodology is illustrated through the development of a multi-aspect ontology to support semantic interoperability in DSSs based on human-machine collective intelligence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Glenn, J.C.: Collective intelligence and an application by the millennium project. World Futur. Rev. 5, 235–243 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756713497331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, Y.: CityMatrix – an urban decision support system augmented by artificial intelligence, MS thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2017). https://dam-prod.media.mit.edu/x/2017/08/23/ryanz-ms-17.pdf. Accessed 08 Feb 2021

  3. Willcox, G., Rosenberg, L., Askay, D., Metcalf, L., Harris, E., Domnauer, C.: Artificial swarming shown to amplify accuracy of group decisions in subjective judgment tasks. In: Arai, K., Bhatia, R. (eds.) FICC 2019. LNNS, vol. 70, pp. 373–383. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12385-7_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Berditchevskaia, A., Baeck, P.: The future of minds and machines. Nesta Report. London (2020). https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/FINAL_The_future_of_minds_and_machines.pdf. Accessed 08 Feb 2021

  5. Pease, S.G., et al.: An interoperable semantic service toolset with domain ontology for automated decision support in the end-of-life domain. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 112, 848–858 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roosan, D., Hwang, A., Law, A.V., Chok, J., Roosan, M.R.: The inclusion of health data standards in the implementation of pharmacogenomics systems: a scoping review. Pharmacogenomics 21, 1191–1202 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs-2020-0066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zacharewicz, G., Daclin, N., Doumeingts, G., Haidar, H.: Model driven interoperability for system engineering. Modelling. 1, 94–121 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/modelling1020007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smirnov, A., Levashova, T., Shilov, N., Ponomarev, A.: Multi-aspect ontology for interoperability in human-machine collective intelligence systems for decision support. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, pp. 458–465. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications (2019). https://doi.org/10.5220/0008356304580465

  9. de Silva, P.A., Ribeiro, C.M.F.A., Schiel, U.: Formalizing ontology reconciliation techniques as a basis for meaningful mediation in service-related tasks. In: Proceedings of the ACM First Ph.D. Workshop in CIKM, pp. 147–154. ACM Press, New York (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1316874.1316898

  10. Boulkroun, B., Benchikha, F., Bachtarzi, C.: Integrating ontological data sources using viewpoints-based approach. J. Comput. Inf. Technol. 24, 383–400 (2016). https://doi.org/10.20532/cit.2016.1003228

  11. Pai, F.-P., Yang, L.-J., Chung, Y.-C.: Multi-layer ontology based information fusion for situation awareness. Appl. Intell. 46(2), 285–307 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-016-0834-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smirnov, A., Ponomarev, A.: Decision support based on human-machine collective intelligence: major challenges. In: Galinina, O., Andreev, S., Balandin, S., Koucheryavy, Y. (eds.) NEW2AN/ruSMART -2019. LNCS, vol. 11660, pp. 113–124. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30859-9_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Uschold, M., King, M.: Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1995). 10.1.1.697.8733

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grüninger, M., Fox, M.S.: Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI-95 Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fernandez, M., Gomes-Perez, A., Juristo, N.: METHONTOLOGY: from ontological art towards ontological engineering. In: AAAI Proceedings of the Symposium on Ontological Engineering, pp. 33–40. AAAI (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford University Report, Stanford (2001). https://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/papers/ontology-tutorial-noy-mcguinness.pdf. Accessed 08 Feb 2021

  17. Noy, N.F., Tu, S.: Ontology Engineering for the Semantic Web and Beyond (2003). https://slideplayer.com/slide/12403284/. Accessed 08 Feb 2021

  18. Sure, Y., Staab, S., Studer, R.: On-to-knowledge methodology (OTKM). In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 117–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_6

  19. Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M.: The NeOn methodology framework: a scenario-based methodology for ontology development. Appl. Ontol. 10, 107–145 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-150145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Neuhaus, F., Vizedom, A.: Ontology Summit 2013 Communiqué: Towards Ontology Evaluation across the Life Cycle (2013). https://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2013/OntologySummit2013_Communique/OntologySummit2013_Communique_v1-0-0_20130503.pdf. Accessed 08 Feb 2021

  21. Abdelghany, A., Darwish, N., Hefni, H.: An agile methodology for ontology development. Int. J. Intell. Eng. Syst. 12, 170–181 (2019). https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2019.0430.17

  22. Smirnov, A., Levashova, T.: Models of decision support in socio-cyber-physical systems. Inf. Control Syst. 55–70 (2019). https://doi.org/10.31799/1684-8853-2019-3-55-70

  23. Rockwell, J., Grosse, I.R., Krishnamurty, S., Wileden, J.C.: A decision support ontology for collaborative decision making in engineering design. In: 2009 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems, pp. 1–9. IEEE (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2009.5067456

  24. Rockwell, J.A., Grosse, I.R., Krishnamurty, S., Wileden, J.C.: A semantic information model for capturing and communicating design decisions. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 10 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3462926

  25. McGuinness, D.L., van Harmelen, F.: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/. Accessed 08 Feb 2021

  26. Protégé. https://protege.stanford.edu/. Accessed 08 Feb 2021

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research is funded by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 19-11-00126).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatiana Levashova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Smirnov, A., Levashova, T., Ponomarev, A., Shilov, N. (2021). Methodology for Multi-aspect Ontology Development. In: Jayawickrama, U., Delias, P., Escobar, M.T., Papathanasiou, J. (eds) Decision Support Systems XI: Decision Support Systems, Analytics and Technologies in Response to Global Crisis Management. ICDSST 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 414. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73976-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73976-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73975-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73976-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics