Abstract
We used BPMN diagrams to identify indicators that can assist teachers in their intervention actions to support students' self-regulation and co-regulation in an asynchronous e-learning context. The use of BPMN modeling, by making explicit the tasks and procedures implicit in the intervention of the e-learning teacher, also exposed which data were available for developing decision-support indicators, as well as the relevant moments for carrying out interventions. Such indicators can help e-learning teachers focus their interventions to support self-regulation and co-regulation of learning, as well as enabling the creation of live data dashboards to support decision-making for those interventions, thus this process can contribute to devise better instruments for teacher intervention in support of self-regulation and co-regulation of student learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
OMG - Object Management Group: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0 (2011)
Morais, C., Pedrosa, D., Fontes, M.M., Cravino, J., Morgado, L.: Detailing an e-Learning course on software engineering and architecture using BPMN. In: Queirós, R., Portela, F., Pinto, M., Simões, A. (eds.) First International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2020), pp. 17:1–17:8. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany (2020)
Caeiro-Rodriguez, M.: Making teaching and learning visible: how can learning designs be represented? In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, pp. 265–274. ACM, León Spain (2019)
Savić, G., Segedinac, M., Milenković, D., Hrin, T., Segedinac, M.: A model-driven approach to e-course management. Aust. J. Educ. Technol. (2017). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3124
van Es, R., Koper, R.: Testing the pedagogical expressiveness of IMS LD. Educ. Technol. Soc. 9, 229–249 (2006)
Zimmerman, B.J.: From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: a social cognitive career path. Educ. Psychol. 48, 135–147 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.794676
Panadero, E.: A review of self-regulated learning: six models and four directions for research. Front. Psychol. 8, 422 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Panadero, E., Järvelä, S.: Socially shared regulation of learning: a review. Eur. Psychol. 20, 190–203 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000226
Harley, J.M., Taub, M., Bouchet, F., Azevedo, R.: A framework to understand the nature of co-regulated learning in human-pedagogical agent interactions. In: SRL@ET (2012)
Bowers, J., Kumar, P.: Students’ perceptions of teaching and social presence: a comparative analysis of face-to-face and online learning environments. Int. J. Web-Based Learn. Teach. Technol. 10, 27–44 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwltt.2015010103
Dabbagh, N., Kitsantas, A.: Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: a natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet High. Educ. 15, 3–8 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
Broadbent, J.: Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. Internet High. Educ. 33, 24–32 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004
Broadbent, J., Poon, W.L.: Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: a systematic review. Internet High. Educ. 27, 1–3 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Pedrosa, D., et al.: Challenges implementing the simprogramming approach in online software engineering education for promoting self and co-regulation of learning. In: 2020 6th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN), pp. 236–242. IEEE, San Luis Obispo (2020)
Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., Santiague, L.: Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: a literature review. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 46, 4–29 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713
Sharp, L.A., Sharp, J.H.: Enhancing student success in online learning experiences through the use of self-regulation strategies. J. Excell. Coll. Teach. 27, 57–75 (2016)
Pérez-Álvarez, R., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M.: Tools to support self-regulated learning in online environments: literature review. In: Pammer-Schindler, V., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Drachsler, H., Elferink, R., Scheffel, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2018. LNCS, vol. 11082, pp. 16–30. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_2
Viberg, O., Khalil, M., Baars, M.: Self-regulated learning and learning analytics in online learning environments: a review of empirical research. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. pp. 524–533. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2020)
Winne, P.: Learning analytics for self-regulated learning. In: Lang, C., Siemens, G., Wise, A.F., Gaševic, D. (eds.) The Handbook of Learning Analytics. pp. 241–249. Society for Learning Analytics Research (SoLAR), Alberta (2017)
Kim, D., Yoon, M., Jo, I.-H., Branch, R.M.: Learning analytics to support self-regulated learning in asynchronous online courses: a case study at a women’s university in South Korea. Comput. Educ. 127, 233–251 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.023
Hassani, A., Ghanouchi, S.A.: Modeling of a collaborative learning process in the context of MOOCs. In: 2016 Third International Conference on Systems of Collaboration (SysCo), pp. 1–6. IEEE, Casablanca (2016)
Hammad, R., Odeh, M., Khan, Z.: Towards a generalised e-learning business process model. In: BUSTECH 2017 : The Seventh International Conference on Business Intelligence and Technology, pp. 20–28. IARIA, Athens (2017)
Subramanian, V.: Towards business process management based workplace e-learning. In: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 555–557. IEEE, Austin (2016)
Pereira, A., Mendes, A.Q., Morgado, L., Amante, L., Bidarra, J.: Universidade Aberta’s pedagogical model for distance education: a university for the future. Universidade Aberta, Lisbon, Portugal (2008)
Guia Informativo - Ensino Aprendizagem - Orientações Metodológicas. https://www2.uab.pt/guiainformativo/detailmenu.php?content=24
Web Service API Functions. https://docs.moodle.org/dev/Web_service_API_functions
Prieto, L.P., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Muñoz-Cristóbal, J.A., Jorrín-Abellán, I.M., Dimitriadis, Y., Gómez-Sánchez, E.: Supporting orchestration of CSCL scenarios in web-based distributed learning environments. Comput. Educ. 73, 9–25 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.008
Grann, J., Bushway, D.: Competency map: visualizing student learning to promote student success. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 168–172. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2014)
Kim, J., Jo, I.-H., Park, Y.: Effects of learning analytics dashboard: analyzing the relations among dashboard utilization, satisfaction, and learning achievement. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 17(1), 13–24 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9403-8
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., Gasevic, D.: Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. Internet High. Educ. 28, 68–84 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002
Sedrakyan, G., Malmberg, J., Verbert, K., Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P.A.: Linking learning behavior analytics and learning science concepts: designing a learning analytics dashboard for feedback to support learning regulation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 107, 105512 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.004
Acknowledgements
This work is co-financed by the ERDF – European Regional Development Fund through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalization - COMPETE 2020 and the Lisboa 2020 under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, and through the Portuguese National Innovation Agency (ANI) as a part of project CHIC POCI-01–0247-FEDER-024498. And also by national funds through the FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., as part of project UID/CED/00194/2019, SCReLProg.
Daniela Pedrosa wishes to thank Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) and CIDTFF (UID/CED/00194/2019) - Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal, for Stimulus of Scientific Employment – CEECIND/00986/2017 Individual Support 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Morais, C., Pedrosa, D., Rocio, V., Cravino, J., Morgado, L. (2021). Using BPMN to Identify Indicators for Teacher Intervention in Support of Self-regulation and Co-regulation of Learning in Asynchronous e-learning. In: Reis, A., Barroso, J., Lopes, J.B., Mikropoulos, T., Fan, CW. (eds) Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education. TECH-EDU 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1384. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73988-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73988-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73987-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73988-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)