Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human-Centered Test Setups for the Evaluation of Human-Technology Interaction in Cockpits of Highly-Automated Vehicles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Applications IV (IHIET-AI 2021)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1378))

  • 1415 Accesses

Abstract

In order to gain a holistic understanding about the operational use of the distinct implementations of driving simulators in research, this paper presents a overview of existing studies dealing with human-technology interaction in cockpits of highly-automated vehicles. One aspect of this work was to find a connection between research questions in scope of the respective studies on the one hand and the test environments being used to assess them on the other. Furthermore, based on the conducted analysis of scientific literature, human-centered descriptive factors required for the definition of a novel, standardized and technologically-independent framework for future examinations of the driver take-over task were identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schnöll, P.: Development of a test environment for the evaluation of human-technology interaction in cockpits of highly-automated vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction Research and Applications, pp. 64–73 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hartfiel, B., Kroys, A., Kruithof, N., Stark, R.: Driving simulator with VR glasses for evaluation of new interior concepts. ATZ Worldw. 121, 16–23 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eriksson, A., Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A.: Transition to manual: comparing simulator with on-road control transitions. Accid. Anal. Prev. 102, 227–234 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Walch, M., Frommel, J., Rogers, K., Schüssel, F., Hock, P., Dobbelstein, D., Weber, M.: Evaluating VR driving simulation from a player experience perspective. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA 2017, pp. 2982–2989. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Banks, V.A., Eriksson, A., O’Donoghue, J., Stanton, N.A.: Is partially automated driving a bad idea? Observations from an on-road study. Appl. Ergon. 68, 138–145 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Neuhuber, N., Lechner, G., Kalayci, T.E., Stocker, A., Kubicek, B.: Age-related differences in the interaction with advanced driver assistance systems - a field study. In: Krömker, H. (ed.) HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. Automated Driving and In-Vehicle Experience Design, HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12212, pp. 363–378. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jamson, A.H., Merat, N., Carsten, O.M.J., Lai, F.C.H.: Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 30, 116–125 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kerschbaum, P., Lorenz, L., Bengler, K.: A transforming steering wheel for highly automated cars. In: 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Seoul, pp. 1287–1292 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lorenz, L., Kerschbaum, P., Schumann, J.: Designing take over scenarios for automated driving: how does augmented reality support the driver to get back into the loop? In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1681–1685 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., Bengler, K.: How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 2063–2067 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schömig, N., Hargutt, V., Neukum, A., Petermann-Stock, I., Othersen, I.: The interaction between highly automated driving and the development of drowsiness. Proc. Manuf. 3, 6652–6659 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., Schrauf, M.: What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 78, 212–221 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., Schrauf, M.: Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 92, 230–239 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feldhütter, A., Gold, C., Schneider, S., Bengler, K.: How the duration of automated driving influences take-over performance and gaze behavior. In: Schlick, C., et al. (eds.) Advances in Ergonomic Design of Systems, Products and Processes. Springer, Heidelberg (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Larsson, P., Johansson, E., Söderman, M., Thompson, D.: Interaction design for communicating system state and capabilities during automated highway driving. Proc. Manuf. 3, 2784–2791 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Melcher, V., Rauh, S., Diederichs, F., Widlroither, H., Bauer, W.: Take-over requests for automated driving. Proc. Manuf. 3, 2867–2873 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mok, B., Johns, M., Lee, K.J., Miller, D., Sirkin, D., Ive, P., Ju, W.: Emergency, automation off: unstructured transition timing for distracted drivers of automated vehicles. In: 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Las Palmas, pp. 2458–2464 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Payre, W., Cestac, J., Delhomme, P.: Fully automated driving: impact of trust and practice on manual control recovery. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 58(2), 229–241 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Petermeijer, S., Bazilinskyy, P., Bengler, K., de Winter, J.: Take-over again: investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop. Appl. Ergon. 62, 204–215 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. van den Beukel, A.P., van der Voort, M.C.: The influence of time-criticality on situation awareness when retrieving human control after automated driving. In: 16th International IEEE Annual Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013), The Hague, pp. 2000–2005 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Köhn, T., Gottlieb, M., Schermann, M., Krcmar, H.: Improving take-over quality in automated driving by interrupting non-driving tasks. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2019), pp. 510–517. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, S., Blythe, P., Guo, W., Namdeo, A., Edwards, S., Goodman, P., Hill, G.: Evaluation of the effects of age-friendly human-machine interfaces on the driver’s takeover performance in highly automated vehicles. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 67, 78–100 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Walch, M., Lange, K., Baumann, M., Weber, M.: Autonomous driving: investigating the feasibility of car-driver handover assistance. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications – Automotive UI 2015, pp. 11–18. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Capallera, M., de Salis, E., Meteier, Q., Angelini, L., Carrino, S., Khaled, O.A., Mugellini, E.: Secondary task and situation awareness, a mobile application for conditionally automated vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings, pp. 86–92. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Louw, T., Merat, N., Jamson, H.: Engaging with highly automated driving: to be or not to be in the loop? In: Proceedings of the 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Salt Lake City, Utah, pp. 190–196. Public Policy Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Media Technology, University of Technology Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany

    Patrick Schnöll

Authors
  1. Patrick Schnöll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Advanced Systems Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

    Tareq Ahram

  2. Campus du Moulin de la Housse, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne GRESPI, Reims Cedex 2, France

    Redha Taiar

  3. Directrice Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, IFMK, Strasbourg, France

    Fabienne Groff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schnöll, P. (2021). Human-Centered Test Setups for the Evaluation of Human-Technology Interaction in Cockpits of Highly-Automated Vehicles. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R., Groff, F. (eds) Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Applications IV. IHIET-AI 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1378. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74009-2_71

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation