Skip to main content

Training Effective Neural Networks on Structured Data with Federated Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA 2021)

Abstract

Federated Learning decreases privacy risks when training Machine Learning (ML) models on distributed data, as it removes the need for sharing and centralizing sensitive data. However, this learning paradigm can also influence the effectiveness of the obtained prediction models. In this paper, we specifically study Neural Networks, as a powerful and popular ML model, and contrast the impact of Federated Learning on the effectiveness compared to a centralized approach – when data is aggregated at one place before processing – to assess to what extent Federated Learning is suited as a replacement. We also analyze the effect of non-independent and identically distributed (non-iid) data on effectiveness and convergence speed (efficiency) of Federated Learning. Based on this, we show in which scenarios (depending on the dataset, the number of nodes in the setting and data distribution) Federated Learning can be successfully employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.kaggle.com/c/acquire-valued-shoppers-challenge/data.

  2. 2.

    https://sites.google.com/site/yangdingqi/home/foursquare-dataset.

  3. 3.

    https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/breast+cancer+wisconsin+(original).

  4. 4.

    http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Adult.

  5. 5.

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4562403.

References

  1. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., y Arcas, B.A.: Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, (2017). PMLR

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sheller, M.J., Reina, G.A., Edwards, B., Martin, J., Bakas, S.: Multi-institutional deep learning modeling without sharing patient data: a feasibility study on brain tumor segmentation. In: International Workshop on Brain Lesion (BrainLes), in conjunction with MICCAI (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., et al.: The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ Digit. Med. 3(1) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Konečný, J., McMahan, H.B., Yu, F.X. Richtárik, P., Suresh, A.T., Bacon, D.: Federated learning: strategies for improving communication efficiency. In: NIPS Workshop on Private Multi-Party Machine Learning (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nishio, T., Yonetani, R.: Client selection for federated learning with heterogeneous resources in mobile edge. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sattler, F., Wiedemann, S., Müller, K.-R., Samek, W.: Robust and communication-efficient federated learning from non-i.i.d. data. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lyu, L., Han, Yu., Zhao, J., Yang, Q.: Threats to Federated Learning. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Truex, S., Liu, L., Gursoy, M., Lei, Yu., Wei, W.: Demystifying membership inference attacks in machine learning as a service. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nilsson, A., Smith, S., Ulm, G., Gustavsson, E., Jirstrand, M.: A performance evaluation of federated learning algorithms. In: Workshop on Distributed Infrastructures for Deep Learning. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., Shmatikov, V.: Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marcano-Cedeño, A., Buendía-Buendía, F.S., Andina, D.: Breast cancer classification applying artificial metaplasticity. In: Bioinspired Applications in Artificial and Natural Computation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 826078 (FeatureCloud). SBA Research (SBA-K1) is a COMET Centre within the COMET – Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies Programme and funded by BMK, BMDW, and the federal state of Vienna. The COMET Programme is managed by FFG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anastasia Pustozerova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pustozerova, A., Rauber, A., Mayer, R. (2021). Training Effective Neural Networks on Structured Data with Federated Learning. In: Barolli, L., Woungang, I., Enokido, T. (eds) Advanced Information Networking and Applications. AINA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 226. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75075-6_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics