Skip to main content

Performance Analysis of POX and OpenDayLight Controllers Based on QoS Parameters

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 226))

Abstract

Software-defined networking (SDN) is an emerging network architecture that has been recently proposed to address the limitations of traditional networks. SDN consists in decoupling the forwarding plane and the control plane and moving this latter to a remote controller, which manages traffic routing rules in a centralized and dynamic fashion. Thus, the controller plays a crucial role in network management operations. A large diversity of open-source controllers, with different features, has been proposed for both industrial and research purposes. Extensive efforts are being deployed to provide a comparative study between available open-source controllers through performance evaluation of underlying SDN networks. In this paper, we provide an overarching performance evaluation of two popular SDN controllers namely, POX and OpenDayLight. Based on Mininet emulator, we assess the most relevant QoS parameters between end nodes in SDN networks namely, throughput, round trip time, jitter and packet loss. Moreover, we compare the behavior of the considered controllers within different network topologies such as, single, tree, linear and custom topologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. POX Wiki. https://openflow.stanford.edu/display/ONL/POX+Wiki.html

  2. RYU SDN Framework. https://osrg.github.io/ryu-book/en/html/

  3. The OpenDayLight Platform. https://www.opendaylight.org/

  4. Floodlight controller. https://floodlight.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ floodlightcontroller/overview

  5. Open Network Operating System (ONOS) Wiki. https://wiki.onosproject.org/

  6. Mininet. http://mininet.org/

  7. Zhu, L., Karim, M. M., Sharif, K., Li, F., Du, X., Guizani, M.: SDN controllers: benchmarking & performance evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.04491 (2019)

  8. Lakhani, G., Kothari, A.: Fault administration by load balancing in distributed SDN controller: a review. Wireless Pers. Commun. 1–33 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Badotra, S., Panda, S.N.: Evaluation and comparison of OpenDayLight and open networking operating system in software-defined networking. Cluster Comput. 1–11 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arahunashi, A.K., Neethu, S., Aradhya, H.R.: Performance analysis of various SDN controllers in Mininet emulator. In: 2019 4th International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication and Technology (RTEICT), pp. 752–756. IEEE, May 2019

    Google Scholar 

  11. Islam, M.T., Islam, N., Al Refat, M.: Node to node performance evaluation through RYU SDN controller. Wireless Pers. Commun., 1–16 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bholebawa, I.Z., Dalal, U.D.: Performance analysis of SDN/OpenFlow controllers: POX versus floodlight. Wireless Pers. Commun. 98(2), 1679–1699 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eljack, A.H., Hassan, A.H.M., Elamin, H.H.: Performance analysis of ONOS and Floodlight SDN controllers based on TCP and UDP Traffic. In: 2019 International Conference on Computer, Control, Electrical, and Electronics Engineering (ICCCEEE), pp. 1-6. IEEE, September 2019

    Google Scholar 

  14. Research, P.J., Raj, P.: Topology-based analysis of performance evaluation of centralized vs. distributed SDN controller. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Current Trends in Advanced Computing (ICCTAC), pp. 1–8. IEEE, February 2018

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mamushiane, L., Lysko, A., Dlamini, S.: A comparative evaluation of the performance of popular SDN controllers. In: 2018 Wireless Days (WD), pp. 54–59. IEEE, April 2018

    Google Scholar 

  16. Priyadarsini, M., Bera, P., Bampal, R.: Performance analysis of software defined network controller architecture—a simulation based survey. In: 2017 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET), pp. 1929–1935. IEEE, March 2017

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, Y., Guo, X., Pang, X., Peng, B., Li, X., Zhang, P.: Performance analysis of Floodlight and Ryu SDN controllers under Mininet simulator. In: 2020 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC Workshops), pp. 85–90. IEEE, August 2020

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Houda Hassen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hassen, H., Meherzi, S., Belghith, S. (2021). Performance Analysis of POX and OpenDayLight Controllers Based on QoS Parameters. In: Barolli, L., Woungang, I., Enokido, T. (eds) Advanced Information Networking and Applications. AINA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 226. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75075-6_61

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics