Abstract
False information and true information fact checking it, often co-exist in social networks, each competing to influence people in their spread paths. An efficient strategy here to contain false information is to proactively identify if nodes in the spread path are likely to endorse false information (i.e. further spread it) or refutation information (thereby help contain false information spreading). In this paper, we propose SCARLET (truSt andCredibility bAsed gRaph neuraLnEtwork model using aTtention) to predict likely action of nodes in the spread path. We aggregate trust and credibility features from a node’s neighborhood using historical behavioral data and network structure and explain how features of a spreader’s neighborhood vary. Using real world Twitter datasets, we show that the model is able to predict false information spreaders with an accuracy of over 87%.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Budak, C., Agrawal, D., Abbadi, A.: Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks. In: WWW (2011)
Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Information credibility on Twitter. In: WWW (2011)
Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20(3), 273–297 (1995)
Hamilton, W., Ying, Z., Leskovec, J.: Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In: NeurIPS (2017)
Jaeger, M., Anthony, S., Rosnow, R.: Who hears what from whom and with what effect: a study of rumor. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 6, 473–478 (1980)
Kipf, T., Welling, M.: Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In: ICLR (2017)
Metzger, M., Flanagin, A.: Credibility and trust of information in online environments: the use of cognitive heuristics. J. Pragmatics 59, 210–220 (2013)
Morris, M., Counts, S., Roseway, A., Hoff, A., Schwarz, J.: Tweeting is believing? Understanding microblog credibility perceptions. In: CSCW (2012)
Nguyen, N., Yan, G., Thai, M., Eidenbenz, S.: Containment of misinformation spread in online social networks. In: WebSci (2012)
Petty, R., Cacioppo, J.: Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1
Qiu, J., Tang, J., Ma, H., Dong, Y., Wang, K., Tang, J.: Deepinf: social influence prediction with deep learning. In: KDD (2018)
Rath, B., Gao, W., Ma, J., Srivastava, J.: Utilizing computational trust to identify rumor spreaders on Twitter. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 8(1), 1–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-018-0540-z
Rath, B., Gao, W., Srivastava, J.: Evaluating vulnerability to fake news in social networks: a community health assessment model. In: ASONAM (2019)
Renn, O., Levine, D.: Credibility and trust in risk communication. In: Kasperson, R.E., Stallen, P.J.M. (eds.) Communicating Risks to the Public. Technology, Risk, and Society (An International Series in Risk Analysis), vol. 4, pp. 175–217. Springer, Dordrecht (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_10
Rosnow, R.: Inside rumor: a personal journey. Am. Psychol. 46, 484 (1991)
Roy, A., Sarkar, C., Srivastava, J., Huh, J.: Trustingness & trustworthiness: a pair of complementary trust measures in a social network. In: ASONAM (2016)
Sharma, K., Qian, F., Jiang, H., Ruchansky, N., Zhang, M., Liu, Y.: Combating fake news: a survey on identification and mitigation techniques. In: TIST (2019)
Tang, J., Qu, M., Wang, M., Zhang, M., Yan, J., Mei, Q.: Line: large-scale information network embedding. In: WWW (2015)
Tong, A., Du, D., Wu, W.: On misinformation containment in online social networks. In: NeurIPS (2018)
Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: NeurIPS (2017)
Veličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Lio, P., Bengio, Y.: Graph attention networks. In: ICLR (2018)
Wu, Z., Pan, S., Chen, F., Long, G., Zhang, C., Philip, S.: A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. (2020)
Lu, Y., Li, C.: GCAN: graph-aware co-attention networks for explainable fake news detection on social media. In: ACL (2020)
Shu, K., Cui, L., Wang, S., Lee, D., Liu, H.: defend: explainable fake news detection. In: KDD (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rath, B., Morales, X., Srivastava, J. (2021). SCARLET: Explainable Attention Based Graph Neural Network for Fake News Spreader Prediction. In: Karlapalem, K., et al. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12712. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75762-5_56
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75762-5_56
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75761-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75762-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)