Skip to main content

Conditional Descriptor Revision and Its Modelling by a CSP

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2021)

Abstract

Descriptor revision is a belief change framework that was introduced by Hansson as an alternative to the currently prevailing AGM paradigm. One central idea of descriptor revision is to describe the desired outcome of a belief change. Thus, descriptor revision allows expressing different kinds of belief change operations like revision or contraction in a structured and combined way. In this paper, we investigate the framework of conditional descriptor revision. Conditional descriptor revision is a variation of descriptor revision aimed at the revision of ranking functions in the context of conditional logic. It is obtained by applying descriptor revision to conditional logic and additionally requiring the belief changes to fulfil the principle of conditional preservation. We show how conditional descriptor revision can be characterized by a constraint satisfaction problem (CSP). In contrast to previous work, we cover the full descriptor language over conditionals closed under conjunction, disjunction, and negation. We also line out an implementation of conditional descriptor revision based on its CSP representation. Since propositional logic can be embedded into conditional logic, our approach also provides descriptor revision for propositional logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the original framework by Hansson this is much more elaborated. Following the terminology of Hansson, here we present a form of local deterministic monoselective descriptor revision [18]. Moreover, we primarily focus on one change, while Hansson designs the framework for change operators.

  2. 2.

    All \( \kappa _0, \gamma _i^+, \gamma _i^- \) can be rational [22], but \( \kappa ^\circ \) has to satisfy the requirements for an OCF, in particular, all \( \kappa ^\circ (\omega ) \) must be non-negative integers. In this paper, it suffices to assume \( \kappa _0, \gamma _i^+, \gamma _i^- \) to be integers and we will thus focus on the case \(\vec {\gamma } \in \mathbb {Z}^{2n}\).

References

  1. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions. J. Symb. Log. 50(2), 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee, M., Dubois, D.: A simple logic for reasoning about incomplete knowledge. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 55(2), 639–653 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.11.003

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Beierle, C., Eichhorn, C., Kutsch, S.: A practical comparison of qualitative inferences with preferred ranking models. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz 31(1), 41–52 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beierle, C., Kern-Isberner, G.: Semantical investigations into nonmonotonic and probabilistic logics. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 65(2–3), 123–158 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Beierle, C., Eichhorn, C., Kern-Isberner, G., Kutsch, S.: Properties of skeptical c-inference for conditional knowledge bases and its realization as a constraint satisfaction problem. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 83(3-4), 247–275 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beierle, C., Kern-Isberner, G., Sauerwald, K., Bock, T., Ragni, M.: Towards a general framework for kinds of forgetting in common-sense belief management. KI 33(1), 57–68 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beierle, C., Kutsch, S.: Computation and comparison of nonmonotonic skeptical inference relations induced by sets of ranking models for the realization of intelligent agents. Appl. Intell. 49(1), 28–43 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1203-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boutilier, C.: Iterated revision and minimal change of conditional beliefs. J. Philos. Logic 25(3), 263–305 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Carlsson, M., Ottosson, G., Carlson, B.: An open-ended finite domain constraint solver. In: Glaser, H., Hartel, P., Kuchen, H. (eds.) PLILP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1292, pp. 191–206. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0033845

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Darwiche, A., Pearl, J.: On the logic of iterated belief revision. Artif. Intell. 89, 1–29 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. de Finetti, B.: La prévision, ses lois logiques et ses sources subjectives. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré 7(1), 1–68 (1937). English translation in Studies in Subjective Probability, Kyburg, H., Smokler, H.E. (eds.) pp. 93–158. Wiley, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haldimann, J., Sauerwald, K., von Berg, M., Kern-Isberner, G., Beierle, C.: Towards a framework of Hansson’s descriptor revision for conditionals. In: The 36th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2021), 22–26 March 2021, Virtual Event, Republic of Korea, pp. 889–891. ACM, New York (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hansson, S.O.: Descriptor revision. Studia Logica 102(5), 955–980 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansson, S.O.: A monoselective presentation of AGM revision. Studia Logica 103(5), 1019–1033 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-015-9604-5

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hansson, S.O.: Blockage revision. J. Logic Lang. Inf. 25(1), 37–50 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-015-9223-6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansson, S.O.: Iterated descriptor revision and the logic of ramsey test conditionals. J. Philos. Logic 45(4), 429–450 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-015-9381-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hansson, S.O.: AGM contraction is not reconstructible as a descriptor operation. J. Log. Comput. 27(4), 1133–1141 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exv076

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansson, S.O.: Descriptor Revision. TL, vol. 46. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53061-1

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Hansson, S.O.: Back to basics: belief revision through direct selection. Studia Logica 107(5), 887–915 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-018-9807-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kern-Isberner, G.: Conditionals in Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Belief Revision. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2087. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44600-1

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Kern-Isberner, G.: A thorough axiomatization of a principle of conditional preservation in belief revision. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 40(1–2), 127–164 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Kern-Isberner, G., Bock, T., Sauerwald, K., Beierle, C.: Iterated contraction of propositions and conditionals under the principle of conditional preservation. In: Benzmüller, C., Lisetti, C., Theobald, M. (eds.) GCAI 2017. 3nd Global Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Miami, USA, 20–22 October 2017. EPiC Series in Computing, vol. 50. EasyChair, October 2017. https://easychair.org/publications/volume/GCAI_2017

  23. Komo, C., Beierle, C.: Upper and lower bounds for finite domain constraints to realize skeptical c-inference over conditional knowledge bases. In: International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics (ISAIM 2020), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 6–8 January (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kutsch, S.: InfOCF-Lib: A Java library for OCF-based conditional inference. In: Beierle, C., Ragni, M., Stolzenburg, F., Thimm, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Dynamics of Knowledge and Belief (DKB-2019) and the 7th Workshop KI & Kognition (KIK-2019) Co-Located with 44nd German Conference on Artificial Intelligence (KI 2019), Kassel, Germany, 23 September 2019. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2445, pp. 47–58. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Makinson, D., Gärdenfors, P.: Relations between the logic of theory change and nonmonotonic logic. In: Fuhrmann, A., Morreau, M. (eds.) The Logic of Theory Change. LNCS, vol. 465, pp. 183–205. Springer, Heidelberg (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0018421

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Sauerwald, K., Haldimann, J., von Berg, M., Beierle, C.: Descriptor revision for conditionals: literal descriptors and conditional preservation. In: Schmid, U., Klügl, F., Wolter, D. (eds.) KI 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12325, pp. 204–218. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58285-2_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Sauerwald, K., Kern-Isberner, G., Beierle, C.: A conditional perspective for iterated belief contraction. In: Giacomo, G.D., Catalá, A., Dilkina, B., Milano, M., Barro, S., Bugarín, A., Lang, J. (eds.) ECAI 2020–24th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 325, pp. 889–896. IOS Press (2020). https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200180

  28. Spohn, W.: Ordinal Conditional Functions: A Dynamic Theory of Epistemic States, pp. 105–134. Springer, Dordrecht (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2865-7_6

  29. Zhang, L.: Believability relations for select-direct sentential revision. Studia Logica 105(1), 37–63 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable hints and comments that helped us to improve the paper. This work was supported by DFG Grant BE 1700/9-1 awarded to Christoph Beierle and DFG Grant KE 1413/10-1 awarded to Gabriele Kern-Isberner as part of the priority program “Intentional Forgetting in Organizations” (SPP 1921). Kai Sauerwald is supported by the grant BE 1700/9-1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas Haldimann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Haldimann, J., Sauerwald, K., von Berg, M., Kern-Isberner, G., Beierle, C. (2021). Conditional Descriptor Revision and Its Modelling by a CSP. In: Faber, W., Friedrich, G., Gebser, M., Morak, M. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12678. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75775-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75775-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75774-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75775-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics