Skip to main content

Trust and Trustworthiness in Northeast Asia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cross-Cultural Design. Experience and Product Design Across Cultures (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12771))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1325 Accesses

Abstract

This study examines the levels of trust and trustworthiness in northeast Asia, including the northeast, southeast, and central regions of China as well as South Korea. Trust and trustworthiness were measured using a simulated two-tier supply chain experiment. The retailer obtains a demand forecast and reports a value to the supplier; then the supplier determines the production based on the retailer’s report. The retailer has an incentive to inflate the report to guarantee sufficient production, whereas the supplier is motivated to deflate the retailer’s report to avoid overproduction. Two participants took part in the experiment together every time: one played as a retailer, and one played as a supplier. In total, 160 participants joined the experiment: 40 from Liaoning (northeast China), 40 from Zhejiang (southeast China), 40 from Hubei (central China), and 40 from South Korea. The results showed that trust in Hubei was relatively high among the investigated regions and country, whereas no difference was found in the level of trustworthiness. Additionally, the trust level was steady through the entire cooperation stages. In contrast, the trustworthiness level was lower in the early stage than in the late stage in Liaoning and Hubei but not in Zhejiang and South Korea. Besides, trust and trustworthiness in Hubei were higher than in Liaoning and South Korea in the middle cooperation stage, and trust in Hubei was higher than trust in Zhejiang in the late cooperation stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Talhelm, T., et al.: Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture. Science 344(6184), 603–608 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Özer, Ö., Zheng, Y., Chen, K.-Y.: Trust in forecast information sharing. Manag. Sci. 57(6), 1111–1137 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang, H., Rau, P.L.P.: Cooperative trust and trustworthiness in China and The United States: does guanxi make a difference? Soc. Behav. Pers. Int. J. 47(5), 1–11 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Özer, Ö., Zheng, Y., Ren, Y.: Trust, trustworthiness, and information sharing in supply chains bridging China and The United States. Manag. Sci. 60(10), 2435–2460 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lei, X.: Effect of self-construal and trust on cooperation performance. Tsinghua University, Beijing, China (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alesina, A., La Ferrara, E.: Who trusts others? J. Public Econ. 85(2), 207–234 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Butler, J.K.: Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. J. Manag. 17(3), 643–663 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(3), 709–734 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., Camerer, C.: Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(3), 393–404 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Flores, F., Solomon, R.C.J.S.T.O.R.: Creating trust. Bus. Ethics Q. 1998, 205–232 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Caldwell, C., Jeffries, F.L.: Ethics, norms, dispositional trust, and context: components of the missing link between trustworthiness and trust. In: Eighth Annual International Conference on Ethics in Business. De Paul University, Chicago, IL (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Caldwell, C., Clapham, S.E.: Organizational trustworthiness: an international perspective. J. Bus. Ethics 47(4), 349–364 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027370104302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brewer, M.B., Gardner, W.: Who is this “We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71(1), 83 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Markus, H.R., Kitayama, S.: Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 98(2), 224 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelley, H.H., Thibaut, J.W.: Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence. Wiley, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kiyonari, T., Yamagishi, T., Cook, K.S., Cheshire, C.: Does trust beget trustworthiness? Trust and trustworthiness in two games and two cultures: a research note. Soc. Psychol. Q. 69(3), 270–283 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Colquitt, J.A., Scott, B.A., LePine, J.A.: Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 92(4), 909 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fukuyama, F.: Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Free Press Paperbacks, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bigley, G.A., Pearce, J.L.: Straining for shared meaning in organization science: problems of trust and distrust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(3), 405–421 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller, A.S., Mitamura, T.: Are surveys on trust trustworthy? Soc. Psychol. Q. 66(1), 62–70 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huff, L., Kelley, L.: Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: a seven-nation study. Organ. Sci. 14(1), 81–90 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oyserman, D.: Is the interdependent self more sensitive to question context than the independent self? Self-Construal Obs. Conversat. Norms (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mamat, M., et al.: Relational self versus collective self: a cross-cultural study in interdependent self-construal between Han and Uyghur in China. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 45(6), 959–970 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li, H.Z., Zhang, Z., Bhatt, G., Yum, Y.-O.: Rethinking culture and self-construal: China as a middle land. J. Soc. Psychol. 146(5), 591–610 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chu, J.Y., et al.: Genetic relationship of populations in China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 11763–11768 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wen, B., et al.: Genetic evidence supports demic diffusion of Han culture. Nature 431(7006), 302–305 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao, T., Lee, T.D.: Gm and Km allotypes in 74 Chinese populations: a hypothesis of the origin of the Chinese nation. Hum. Genet. 83(2), 101–110 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Talhelm, T., Zhang, X., Oishi, S.: Moving chairs in Starbucks: observational studies find rice-wheat cultural differences in daily life in China. Sci. Adv. 4(4), eaap8469 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yamagishi, T., Yamagishi, M.: Trust and commitment in The United States and Japan. Motiv. Emot. 18(2), 129–166 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Keser, C.: Trust and Reputation Building in E-commerce (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ganesan, S.: Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. J. Mark. 58(2), 1–19 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Anderson, E., Weitz, B.: Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Mark. Sci. 8(4), 310–323 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Anderson, E., Weitz, B.: The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. J. Mark. Res. 29(1), 18–34 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cochard, F., Van, P.N., Willinger, M.: Trusting behavior in a repeated investment game. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 55(1), 31–44 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bottom, W.P., Gibson, K., Daniels, S.E., Murnighan, J.K.: When talk is not cheap: substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organ. Sci. 13(5), 497–513 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fischbacher, U.: z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp. Econ. 10(2), 171–178 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hu, X.W.: Quantitative evaluation on Zhejiang family businesses. Zhejiang Sch. J. 2, 158–162. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pei-Luen Patrick Rau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lei, X., Ko, M., Rau, PL.P. (2021). Trust and Trustworthiness in Northeast Asia. In: Rau, PL.P. (eds) Cross-Cultural Design. Experience and Product Design Across Cultures. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12771. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77074-7_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77074-7_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77073-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77074-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics