Skip to main content

Exploratory Study on the Use of Augmentation for Behavioural Control in Shared Spaces

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12770))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Shared spaces are regulation free, mixed traffic environments supporting social interactions between pedestrian, cyclist and vehicles. Even when these spaces are designed to foster safety supported by reduced traffic speeds, unforeseen collisions and priority conflicts are always an open question. While AR can be used to realise virtual pedestrian lanes and traffic signals, the change in pedestrian motion dynamics using such approaches needs to be understood. This work highlights an exploratory study to evaluate how speed and path of pedestrians are impacted when using an augmented reality based virtual traffic light interface to control collisions in pedestrian motion. To achieve this objective we analyse the motion information from controlled experiments, replicating pedestrian motion on a lane supported by a stop and go interface and including scenarios such as confronting a crossing pedestrian. Our statistical and quantitative analysis gives some early insights on pedestrian control using body worn AR systems

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jansen, S.E.M., Toet, A., Werkhoven, P.J.: Human locomotion through a multiple obstacle environment: strategy changes as a result of visual field limitation. Exp. Brain Res. 212(3), 449–456 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moussaïd, M., Helbing, D., Theraulaz, G.: How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 108(17), 6884–6888 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Basili, P., et al.: Strategies of locomotor collision avoidance. Gait Post. 37(3), 385–390 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cinelli, M.E., Patla, A.E.: Task-specific modulations of locomotor action parameters based on on-line visual information during collision avoidance with moving objects. Hum. Mov. Sci. 27(3), 513–531 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, E.: Shared Space-the alternative approach to calming traffic. Traffic Eng. Control 47(8), 290–292 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hamilton-Baillie, B.: Shared space: reconciling people, places and traffic. Built Environ. 34(2), 161–181 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Koorey, G.: The ‘On-again/Off-again’ debate about cycle facilities. In: 5th NZ Cycling Conference (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peitso, L.E., Michael, J.B.: The promise of interactive shared augmented reality. Computer 53(1), 45–52 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stoker, P., et al.: Pedestrian safety and the built environment: a review of the risk factors. J. Plan. Liter. 30(4), 377–392 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lonero, L.P., Clinton, K.M., Sleet, D.A.: Behavior change interventions in road safety. Injury Viol. Prev. Behav. Sci. Theories Methods Appl. 213–233 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zegeer, C.V., et al.: Guidance for implementation of the AASHTO strategic highway safety plan. Volume 10: A Guide for Reducing Collisions Involving Pedestrians. No. Project G17–18 (3) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Retting, R.A., Ferguson, S.A., McCartt, A.T.: A review of evidence-based traffic engineering measures designed to reduce pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes. Am. J. Public Health 93(9), 1456–1463 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zegeer, C.V., Bushell, M.: Pedestrian crash trends and potential countermeasures from around the world. Accid. Anal. Prev. 44(1), 3–11 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pedestrian Safety: A Road Safety Manual for Decision-makers and Practitioners. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/roadsafety/projects/manuals/pedestrian/en/. Accessed 25 Aug 2013

  15. Kamalasanan, V., Sester, M.: Behaviour control with augmented reality systems for shared spaces. Int. Arch. Photogram. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 43, 591–598 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Damien Constantine, R., et al.: Towards large scale high fidelity collaborative augmented reality (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Franek, M., Penickova, S., Ondracek, L., Brandysky, P.: Influence of urban vegetation on the walking speed of pedestrians. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie 52(6), 597–608 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fruin, J.J.: Designing for pedestrians: A level-of-service concept. No. HS-011 999 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Habicht, A.T., Braaksma, J.P.: Effective width of pedestrian corridors. J. Transp. Eng. 110(1), 80–93 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dabbs Jr, J.M., Stokes III, N.A.: Beauty is power: the use of space on the sidewalk. Sociometry 551–557 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Burgess, J.W.: Interpersonal spacing behavior between surrounding nearest neighbors reflects both familiarity and environmental density. Ethol. Sociobiol. 4(1), 11–17 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolff, M.: Notes on the behaviour of pedestrians. In: People in Places: The Sociology of the Familiar. Praeger, New York, pp. 35–48 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hicheur, H., et al.: The formation of trajectories during goal-oriented locomotion in humans. I. A stereotyped behaviour. Eur. J. Neurosci. 26(8), 2376–2390 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fajen, B., Warren, W.H.: Behavioral dynamics of steering, obstacle avoidance, and route selection. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 29(2), 343 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huber, M., et al.: Adjustments of speed and path when avoiding collisions with another pedestrian. PloS one 9(2), e89589 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Olaverri-Monreal, C., et al.: In-vehicle virtual traffic lights: a graphical user interface. In: 7th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI 2012). IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tang, L., Zhou, J.: Usability assessment of augmented reality-based pedestrian navigation aid. In: Duffy, V.G. (ed.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12198, pp. 581–591. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49904-4_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Wojke, N., Bewley, A., Paulus, D.: Simple online and real time tracking with a deep association metric. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP). IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bochkovskiy, A., Wang, C.-Y., Liao, H.-Y.M.: Yolov4: optimal speed and accuracy of object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10934 (2020)

  30. Papageorgiou, M., et al.: Lane-free artificial-fluid concept for vehicular traffic. Proc. IEEE 109(2), 114–121 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zijlstra, F.R.H.: University of Technology, Van Doorn. The construction of a scale to measure perceived effort (1985)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Frederik Schewe , Monika Sester or Mark Vollrath .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kamalasanan, V., Schewe, F., Sester, M., Vollrath, M. (2021). Exploratory Study on the Use of Augmentation for Behavioural Control in Shared Spaces. In: Chen, J.Y.C., Fragomeni, G. (eds) Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12770. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77599-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77599-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77598-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77599-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics