Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Extended Reality, Pedagogy, and Career Readiness: A Review of Literature

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12770))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recently, there has been a significant spike in the level of ideation with, and deployment of, extended reality (XR) tools and applications in many aspects of the digital workplace. It is also projected that acceptance and use of XR technology to improve work performance will continue to grow in the coming decade. However, there has not been a robust level of adoption and implementation of XR technology, to include augmented reality (AR), mixed-reality (MR), and virtual reality (VR) within academic institutions, training organizations, government agencies, business entities, and community or professional associations. This paper examines the current literature to determine how XR and related technologies have been explored, evaluated, or used in educational and training activities. As part of the literature review, we paid special attention on how XR tools, applications are being deployed to increase work and career readiness, performance, and resiliency of students, adult learners, and working professionals. Results from the study showed that XR applications are being used, often at pilot-testing levels, in disciplines such as medicine, nursing, and engineering. The data also show that many academic institutions and training organizations have yet to develop concrete plans for wholesale use and adoption of XR technologies to support teaching and learning activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Du Boulay, B.: Artificial intelligence as an effective classroom assistant. IEEE Intell. Syst. 31(6), 76–81 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Magana, A.J.: Learning strategies and multimedia techniques for scaffolding size and scale cognition. Comput. Educ. 72, 367–377 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alexander, S., Sarrafzadeh, A., Hill, S.: Foundation of an affective tutoring system: learning how human tutors adapt to student emotion. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Technol. Appl. 4(3), 335–367 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ertmer, P.A.: Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 53(4), 25–39 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atman, U.N., Usluel, Y.K.: Predicting technology integration based on a conceptual framework for ICT use in education. Technol. Pedagogy Educ. 28(5), 517–531 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chou, P.N., Feng, S.T.: Using a tablet computer application to advance high school students’ laboratory learning experiences: a focus on electrical engineering education. Sustainability 11, 1–14 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodson, I.F., Mangan, J.M.: Subject cultures and the introduction of classroom computers. Br. Educ. Res. J. 21(5), 613–628 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Darin, A.: User experience of mobile virtual reality: experiment on changes in students’ attitudes. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 19(3), 80–93 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Itin, C.M.: Reasserting the philosophy of experiential education as a vehicle for change in the 21st century. J. Exp. Educ. 22(2), 91–98 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kickul, J., Griffiths, M., Bacq, S.: The boundary-less classroom: extending social innovation and impact learning to the field. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 17(4), 652–663 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aggarwal, R.: Developing a global mindset: Integrating demographics, sustainability, technology, and globalization. J. Teach. Int. Bus. 22(1), 51–69 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nealy, C.: Integrating soft skills through active learning in the management classroom. J. Coll. Teach. Learn. 2(4), 80–93 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brynjolsson, E., McAfee, A.: The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Co, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Strada Institute and Emsi, Robot-ready: Human, skills for the future of work (2018). https://www.economicmodeling.com/robot-ready-reports

  15. L’Ecuyer, K.M., Pole, D., Leander, S.A.: The use of PBL in an interprofessional education course for health care professional students. Interdiscip. J. Probl. Based Learn. 9(1), 6 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Llewellyn, A., Clarke, D.: How are CSU advertising students being prepared to be industry-ready graduates? J. Teach. Learn. Graduate Employab. 4(1), 73–84 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hart Research Associates: Takes more than a major: employer priorities for college learning and student success (2013). http://www.aacu.org/leap/documents/2013_EmployerSurvey.pdf

  18. Robles, M.: Executive perception of the top 10 soft skills needed in today’s workplace. Bus. Commun. Q. 75(4), 453–465 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haller, M., Landerl, F.: A mediated reality environment using a loose and sketchy rendering technique. In: Ismar: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 184–185 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2005.4

  20. Maas, M.J., Hughes, J.: Virtual, augmented and mixed reality in K–12 education: a review of the literature. Technol. Pedagogy Educ. 29, 231–249 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mann, S., Furness, T., Yuan, Y., Iorio, J., Wang, Z.: All reality: virtual, augmented, mixed (X), mediated (X, Y), and multimediated reality. arXiv, abs/1804.08386 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, K., Zhou, X., Radu, I.: XR-Ed framework: designing instruction-driven and learner-centered extended reality systems for education. arXiv, abs/2010.13779 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. O’Callaghan, T., Harbin, A.: Truly immersive worlds? The pedagogical implications of extended reality. J. Interact. Technol. Pedagogy Spec. Issue Potential Ext. Reality (XR): Teach. Learn. Virtual Spaces 17 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Milgram, P., Takemura H., Utsumi A., Kishino F.: Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In: Proceedings of Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, pp. 2351–34 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Craig, A.: Understanding Augmented Reality: Concepts and Applications. Elsevier, Waltham (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Flavián, C., Ibáñez-Sánchez, S., Orús, C.: The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience. J. Bus. Res. 100, 547–560 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sivan, Y.: 3D3C real virtual worlds defined: the immense potential of merging 3D, community, creation, and commerce. J. Virtual Worlds Res. 1(1), 1–32 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Okeil, A.: Hybrid design environments: immersive and non-immersive architectural design. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. (ITcon), 15, 202–216 (2010). http://www.itcon.org/2010/16

  29. Simon, A., Smith, R., Pawlicki, R.: OmniStereo for panoramic virtual environment display systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality, pp. 67–74 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Alves, C., Luís Reis, J.: The intention to use E-commerce using augmented reality - the case of IKEA place. In: Rocha, Á., Ferrás, C., Montenegro Marin, C.E., Medina García, V.H. (eds.) ICITS 2020. AISC, vol. 1137, pp. 114–123. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40690-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Shen, Y., Ong, S.K., Nee, A.Y.: Augmented reality for collaborative product design and development. Des. Stud. 31, 118–145 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cipresso, P., Giglioli, I.A.C., Raya, M.A., Riva, G.: The past, present, and future of virtual and augmented reality research: a network and cluster analysis of the literature. Front. Psychol. 9, Article 2086 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02086

  33. Laurel, B.: Computers as Theatre, pp. 49–65. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sutherland, I.E.: A head-mounted three-dimensional display. In: Proceedings of the December 9–11, Fall Joint Computer Conference, Part I, pp. 757–764. ACM (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Poetker, B.: The very real history of virtual reality (A Look Ahead). G2 Learning Hub (2019). https://learn.g2.com/history-of-virtual-reality

  36. Pimentel, K., Teixeira, K.: Virtual Reality. McGraw-Hill, New York (1993). ISBN 978-0-8306-4065-2

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gračanin, D., Stewart, M., Duncan, T., Handosa, M., Schulze, H.: Mixed-reality and project based curriculum development: empowering STEM learners and educators in southwest virginia appalachian region. In: 2018 IEEE VR Third Workshop on K-12+ Embodied Learning Through Virtual & Augmented Reality (KELVAR 2018), Held as Part of IEEE Virtual Reality, Reutlingen, Germany. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jenab, K., Moslehpour, S., Khoury, S.: Virtual maintenance, reality, and systems: a review. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 6(6), 2698–2707 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sarnoff, P.: The VR in the enterprise report: how retailers and brands are illustrating VR’s potential in sales, employee training, and product development. BusinessInsider (2018). https://www.businessinsider.com/virtual-reality-for-enterprise-sales-employee-training-product-2018-12

  40. Gray, K., Koncz, A.: The key attributes employers seek on students’ Resumes (2017). https://www.naceweb.org/about-us/press/2017/the-key-attributes-employers-seek-on-students-resumes/

  41. Mitchell, G., Skinner, L., White, B.: Essential soft skills for success in the twenty-first century workforce as perceived by business educators. Delta Pi Epsilon J. 52(1), 43–53 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Davidson, K.: Employers find ‘soft skills’ like critical thinking in short supply. Wall Street J. (3) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Strauss, V.: The surprising thing google learned about its employees—and what it means for today’s students. Washington Post (2017). www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2017/12/20/the-surprising-thing-google-learned-about-its-employees-and-what-it-means-for-todays-students/

  44. Badrinarayanan, V., Arnett, D.: Effective virtual new product development teams: an integrated framework. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 23(4), 242–248 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620810865816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jenster, N.P., Steiler, D.: Turning up the volume in inter-personal leadership: motivating and building cohesive global virtual teams during times of economic crisis. In: Mobley, W.H., Weldon, E. (eds.) Advances in Global Leadership. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bradford, GBR (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Levy, O., Beechler, S., Taylor, S., Boyacigiller, N.A.: What we talk about when we talk about “global mindset”: managerial cognition in multinational corporations. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 38, 231–258 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Barrows, H.S.: Practice-Based Learning: Problem-Based Learning Applied to Medical Education. Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hmelo-Silver, C.E.: Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educ. Psychol. Rev. 16(3), 235–266 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Fabris, C.: College students think they’re ready for the work force. Employers aren’t so Sure. The Chronicle of Higher Education (2015). http://chronicle.com/article/College-Students-Think/151289/

  50. Cuban, L.: Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920. Teachers College Press, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Foshee, C., Elliott, S.N., Atkinson, R.: Technology-enhanced learning in college mathematics remediation. Br. J. Educ. Technol. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Januszewski, A.: Educational Technology: The Development of a Concept. Libraries Unlimited (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kennedy, M., Dunn, T.: Improving the use of VLEs in higher education in the UK: A qualitative visualisation of students’ views. Contemporary Educational Technology (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, F.: Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills, 9th edn. Allyn & Bacon, Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., Aston, R.: What Works and Why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Stud. High. Educ. 42(8), 1567–1579 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Starr, L.: Integrating technology in the classroom: it takes more than just having computers (2011). http://www.educationworld.com/a_tech/tech/tech146.shtml

  57. Steedman, M.: Formalizing affordance. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 834–839 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Stoffregen, T.A.: Affordances as properties of the animal-Environment system. Ecol. Psychol. 15(2), 115–134 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Norman, D.A.: The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hussein, M., Nätterdal, C.: The Benefits of Virtual Reality in Education: A Comparison Study. University of Gothenburg, Chalmers University of Technology (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000003253155

  62. Özgen, D.S., Afacan, Y., Sürer, E.: Usability of virtual reality for basic design education: a comparative study with paper-based design. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 31(2), 357–377 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09554-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ibáñez, M.B., Di Serio, A., Villarán, D., Kloos, C.D.: Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Comput. Educ. 71, 1–13 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Shin, D.: The role of affordance in the experience of virtual reality learning: technological and affective affordances in virtual reality. Telematics Inform. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Nye, B.D., Silverman, B.G.: Affordances in AI. In: Seel, N.M. (ed.) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, pp. 183–187. Springer, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_386

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  66. Montesano, L., Lopes, M., Bernardino, A., Santos-Victor, J.: Learning object affordances: from sensory motor maps to imitation. IEEE Trans. Robot. 24(1) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., Wachira, P.: The use of computer tools to support meaningful learning. AACE J. 16(1), 77–92 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., Grover, D.: Augmented reality in education–cases, places and potentials. Educ. Media Int. 51, 1–15 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Engelbrecht, H., Lindeman, R., Hoermann, S.A.: SWOT analysis of the field of virtual reality for firefighter training. Front. Robot. AI 6, 101 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Jensen, L.K.: A Review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Educ. Inf. Technol. 23, 1515–1529 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Dewey, J.: Experience and Education. The Macmillan Company, New York (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Kolb, D.A.: Learning Style Inventory. McBer & Company, Boston (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ord, J., Leather, M.M.: The substance beneath the labels of experiential learning: the importance of John Dewey for outdoor educators. J. Outdoor Environ. Educ. 15, 13–23 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Yoder, J.D., Hochevar, C.M.: Encouraging active learning can improve students’ performance on examinations. Teach. Psychol. 32(2), 91–95 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., K.: Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 17(4), 133–149 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Mikropoulos, T., Natsis, A.: Educational virtual environments: a ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Comput. Educ. 56(3), 769–780 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Dewey, A., Drahota, A.: Introduction to systematic reviews: Online learning module cochrane training (2016). https://training.cochrane.org/interactivelearning/module-1-introduction-conducting-systematic-reviews

  78. MacKenzie, H., et al.: Systematic reviews: what they are, why they are important, and how to get involved. J. Clin. Prev. Cardiol. 1(4), 193–202 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wei-Che, H., Tseng, C., Kang, S.: Using exaggerated feedback in a virtual reality environment to enhance behavior intention of water-conservation. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 21(4), 187–203 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Li, D.: Application of 3D virtual ocean image simulation in ship vision. J. Coast. Res., 530–34 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2307/26853997

  81. Gallup, J., Serianni, B.: Developing friendships and an awareness of emotions using video games: perceptions of four young adults with autism. Educ. Train. Autism Dev. Disabil. 52(2), 20–131 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Wu, B., Hu, Y., Wang, M.: How do head-mounted displays and planning strategy influence problem-solving-based learning in introductory electrical circuit design? Educ. Technol. Soc. 23(3), 40–52 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2307/26926425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Kamarainen, A., Reilly, J., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., Dede, C.: Using mobile location-based augmented reality to support outdoor learning in undergraduate ecology and environmental science courses. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 99(2), 259–276 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Abbas, J.R., Kenth, J.J., Bruce, I.A.: The role of virtual reality in the changing landscape of surgical training. J. Laryngol. Otol. 134(10), 863–866 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215120002078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Sáez-López, Cózar-Gutiérrez.: Augmented reality in higher education: An evaluation program in initial teacher training. Educ. Sci. 10(2), 26 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Hiranyachattada, T., Kusirirat, K.: Using mobile augmented reality to enhancing students’ conceptual understanding of physically-based rendering in 3D animation. Eur. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 8(1), 1–5 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Vieira, E.R., et al.: Using augmented reality with older adults in the community to select design features for an age-friendly park: a pilot study. J. Aging Res. (2020). http://dx.doi.org.librarylink.uncc.edu/10.1155/2020/8341034

  88. Liu, S., Xie, M., Ye, Z.: Combating COVID-19—how can AR telemedicine help doctors more effectively implement clinical work. J. Med. Syst. 44(9), 1–2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01618-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Vasilevski, N., Birt, J.: Analysing construction student experiences of mobile mixed reality enhanced learning in virtual and augmented reality environments. Assoc. Learn. Technol. J. Res. Learn. Technol. 28 (2020). http://dx.doi.org.librarylink.uncc.edu/10.25304/rlt.v28.2329

  90. Celik, C., Gokhan G., Nevin, K. C.: Integration of mobile augmented reality (MAR) applications into biology laboratory: anatomic structure of the heart. Assoc. Learn. Technol. J. Res. Learn. Technol. 28 (2020). http://dx.doi.org.librarylink.uncc.edu/10.25304/rlt.v28.2355

  91. Damio, S.M., Ibrahim, Q.: Virtual reality speaking application utilisation in combatting presentation apprehension. Asian J. Univ. Educ. 15(3), 235–244 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Kim, S., et al.: Virtual reality visualization model (VRVM) of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle of carbohydrate metabolism for medical biochemistry education. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 28(6), 602–612 (2019). http://dx.doi.org.librarylink.uncc.edu/10.1007/s10956-019-09790-y

  93. Syawaludin, A., Gunarhadi, R., Peduk: Development of augmented reality-based interactive multimedia to improve critical thinking skills in science learning. Int. J. Instr. 12(4), 331–344 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  94. Starr, C.R., Anderson, B.R., Green, K.A.: I’m a computer scientist!: virtual reality experience influences stereotype threat and STEM motivation among undergraduate women. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 28(5), 493–507 (2019). http://dx.doi.org.librarylink.uncc.edu/10.1007/s10956-019-09781-z

  95. Calvert, P.: Virtual reality as a tool for teaching library design. Educ. Inf. 35(4), 439–450 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-170150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Cooper, G., Park, H., Nasr, Z., Thong, L.P., Johnson, R.: Using virtual reality in the classroom: Preservice teachers’ perceptions of its use as a teaching and learning tool. Educ. Media Int. 56(1), 1–13 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Netland, T.H., Flaeschner, O., Maghazei, O., Brown, K.: Teaching operations management with virtual reality: bringing the factory to the students. J. Manag. Educ. 44(3), 313–341 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562919892028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Larson, K.E., Hirsch, S.E., McGraw, J.P., Bradshaw, C.P.: Preparing preservice teachers to manage behavior problems in the classroom: the feasibility and acceptability of using a mixed-reality simulator. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 35(2), 63–75 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419836415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Fraser, D.W., Marder, T.J., deBettencourt, L.U., Myers, L.A., Kalymon, K.M., Harrell, R.M.: Using a mixed-reality environment to train special educators working with students with autism spectrum disorder to implement discrete trial teaching. Focus Autism Other Dev. Disabil. 35(1), 3–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357619844696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Bridges, S.A., Robinson, O.P., Stewart, E.W., Kwon, D., Mutua, K.: Augmented reality: teaching daily living skills to adults with intellectual disabilities. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 35(1), 3–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419836411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Hauze, S., Marshall, J.: Validation of the instructional materials motivation survey: measuring student motivation to learn via mixed reality nursing education simulation. Int. J. E-Learn. 19(1), 49–64 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  102. Wells, T., Miller, G.: The effect of virtual reality technology on welding skill performance. J. Agric. Educ. 61(1), 152–171 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  103. Bennie, S.J., et al.: Teaching enzyme catalysis using interactive molecular dynamics in virtual reality. J. Chem. Educ. 96(11), 2488–2496 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Stuart, J., Rutherford, R.J.: Medical student concentration during lectures. Lancet 312, 514–516 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(78)92233-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Yang, H., Tate, M.: Where are we at with cloud computing? A descriptive literature review [Paper presentation]. In: 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 807–819. AIS (2009). https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2009/26/

  106. Conole, G., Dyke, M.: What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? ALT-J 12(2), 113–124 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Dalgarno, B., Lee, M.J.: What are the learning affordances of 3D virtual environments? Br. J. Edu. Technol. 41(1), 10–32 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Schild, J., Lerner, D., Misztal, S., Luiz, T.: EPICSAVE—enhancing vocational training for paramedics with multi-user virtual reality. In: 2018 IEEE 6th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  109. Pereira, V., Matos, T., Rodrigues, R., Nóbrega., R., Jacob, J.: Extended reality framework for remote collaborative interactions in virtual environments. ICGI, Faro, Portugal, pp. 17–24 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGI47575.2019.8955025

  110. Cassard, A.M., Sloboda, B.W.: AI and AR: a copacetic approach in the new educational environment. In: Choi, D.H., Dailey-Hebert, A., Estes, J.S. (ed.) Current and Prospective Applications of Virtual Reality in Higher Education, pp. 216–231. IGI Global (2021). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4960-5.ch010

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School and Learning Technology, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, USA

    Patrick Guilbaud

  2. Learning Design and Technology, UNC at Charlotte, Charlotte, USA

    T. Christa Guilbaud

  3. Catapult Games, Schenectady, USA

    Dane Jennings

Authors
  1. Patrick Guilbaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Christa Guilbaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dane Jennings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Guilbaud .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA

    Jessie Y. C. Chen

  2. U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center, Orlando, FL, USA

    Gino Fragomeni

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Guilbaud, P., Guilbaud, T.C., Jennings, D. (2021). Extended Reality, Pedagogy, and Career Readiness: A Review of Literature. In: Chen, J.Y.C., Fragomeni, G. (eds) Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12770. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77599-5_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77599-5_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77598-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77599-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation