Abstract
The ubiquity of sophisticated devices, along with uninterrupted access to the Internet and organizational computerized systems, allows for the “anyplace” workplace to be established. Technology has the potential to deliberately or inadvertently impact psychological wellbeing. Specific psychological demands are inadvertently imposed on remote employees whose permanent online presence is required. Hence, it is important to understand factors affecting digital wellbeing and steps that can be taken to maximize the wellbeing of remote employees. This paper provides suggestions for future research on studying the digital wellbeing of (fully or partially) remote employees. A research framework is proposed to demonstrate the different levels of analysis at which digital wellbeing could be explored and studied.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barbuto, A., Gilliland, A., Peebles, R., Rossi, N., Shrout, T.: Telecommuting: smarter workplaces. Retrieved from The Ohio State University. Campus as a living laboratory. Environment, Economy, Development and Sustainability (EEDS) Capstone (2020). http://hdl.handle.net/1811/91648
Bednar, P.M., Welch, C.: Socio-technical perspectives on smart working: creating meaningful and sustainable systems. Inf. Syst. Front. 22(2), 281–298 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09921-1
Bjerrum, E., Bødker, S.: Knowledge sharing in the ‘new office’. In: Eighth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 199–219. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands (2003)
Blabst, N., Diefenbach, S.: WhatsApp and well-being: a study on WhatsApp usage, communication quality and stress. In: Proceedings of the 31st International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (HCI 2017), Sunderland, UK (2017)
Bolisani, E., Scarso, E., Ipsen, C., Kirchner, K., Hansen, J.P.: Working from home during COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned and issues. Manage. Mark. Challenges Knowl. Soc. 15(s1), 458–476 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2020-0027
Brod, C.: Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1984)
Brooks, S.: Does personal social media usage affect efficiency and well-being. Comput. Hum. Behav. 46, 26–37 (2015)
Brown, L., Kuss, D.J.: Fear of missing out, mental wellbeing, and social connectedness: a seven-day social media abstinence trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(12), 4566 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124566
Burmeister, C.P., Moskaliuk, J., Cress, U.: Ubiquitous working: do work versus non-work environments affect decision-making and concentration? Front. Psychol. 9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00310
Burr, C., Taddeo, M., Floridi, L.: The ethics of digital well-being: a thematic review. Sci. Eng. Ethics 26(4), 2313–2343 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00175-8
Byström, K.: Information challenges, challenging information in digital workplaces: report from the European network for workplace information symposium 2015. J. Libr. Inf. Sci. 42(1) (2016). https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/information-challenges-challenging-digital/docview/1999243693/se-2?accountid=37193
Bødker, S.: Rethinking technology on the boundaries of life and work. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 20(4), 533–544 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0933-9
Bødker, S., Christiansen, E.: Computer support for social awareness in flexible work. Comput. Support. Cooper. Work 15(1), 1–28 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-005-9011-y
Calvo, R.A., Peters, D.: Positive Computing: Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)
Caplan, S.: Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic internet use. Cycberpsychol. Behav. 10(2), 234–242 (2007)
Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H.: Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manage. Sci. 32(5), 554–571 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
De Menezes, L.M., Kelliher, C.: Flexible working and performance: a systematic review of the evidence for a business case. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 13(4), 452–474 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00301.x
Dennis, A.R., Kinney, S.T.: Testing media richness theory in the new media: the effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Inf. Syst. Res. 9(3), 256–274 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.3.256
Dennis, A.R., Fuller, R.M., Valacich, J.S.: Media, tasks, and communication processes: a theory of media synchronicity. MIS Q. 32(3), 575 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2307/25148857
Desmet, P., Fokkinga, S.: Beyond Maslow’s pyramid: introducing a typology of thirteen fundamental needs for human-centered design. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 4(3), 38 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030038
Desmet, P., Hekkert, P.: Framework of product experience. Int. J. Design 1(1), 57–66 (2007). https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/framework-product-experience/docview/921466399/se-2?accountid=37193
Desmet, P., Overbeeke, K., Tax, S.: Designing products with added emotional value: development and application of an approach for research through design. Des. J. 4(1), 32–47 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2752/146069201789378496
Desmet, P., Pohlmeyer, A.: Positive design: an introduction to design for subjective well-being. Int. J. Design 7(3), 5–19 (2013). https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/positive-design-introduction-subjective-well/docview/1468157524/se-2?accountid=37193
Diefenbach, S., Ullrich, D.: Digitale depression: wie neue Medien unser Glücksempfinden verändern. MVG Verlag, München (2016)
Duke, É., Montag, C.: Smartphone addiction, daily interruptions and self-reported productivity. Addict. Behav. Rep. 6, 90–95 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2017.07.002
Duxbury, L., Smart, R.: The “myth of separate worlds”: an exploration of how mobile technology has redefined work-life balance. In: Creating Balance (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16199-5_15
Elster, J., Jon, E.: Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Floridi, L.: The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford University Press, New York (2014)
Fox, J., Moreland, J.J.: The dark side of social networking sites: an exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Comput. Hum. Behav. 45, 168–176 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.083
Galluch, P., Grover, V., Thatcher, J.: Interrupting the workplace: examining stressors in an information technology context. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 16(1), 1–47 (2015). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00387
García del Castillo-Rodríguez, J.A., Ramos-Soler, I., López-Sánchez, C., Quiles-Soler, C.: Information and communication technologies and quality of life in home confinement: development and validation of the TICO scale. PLoS One 15(11), e0241948 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241948
Giddens, A.: Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. University of California Press, Oakland (1979)
Giddens, A.: The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, Oakland (1984)
Grant, A.M., Christianson, M.K., Price, R.H.: Happiness, health, or relationships? Managerial practices and employee well-being tradeoffs. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 21(3), 51–63 (2007). https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.26421238
Greenwood, K., Krol, N.: 8 ways managers can support employees’ mental health [Harvard Business Review online] (2020). https://hbr.org/2020/08/8-ways-managers-can-support-employees-mental-health
Gui, M., Fasoli, M., Carradore, R.: “Digital wellbeing”: developing a new theoretical tool for media literacy research. Ital. J. Sociol. Educ. 9, 155–173 (2017). https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2017-1-8
Hancock, P.A., Pepe, A.A., Murphy, L.L.: Hedonomics: the power of positive and pleasurable ergonomics. Ergon. Design: Quart. Hum. Factors Appl. 13(1), 8–14 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/106480460501300104
Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., Göritz, A.: Needs, affect, and interactive products – Facets of user experience. Interact. Comput. 22(5), 353–362 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.002
Hassenzahl, M., Eckoldt, K., Diefenbach, S., Laschke, M., Len, E., Kim, J.: Designing moments of meaning and pleasure. Experience design and happiness. Int. J. Design 7(3), 21–31 (2013). https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/designing-moments-meaning-pleasure-experience/docview/1468157555/se-2?accountid=37193h
Hill, E., Ferris, M., Märtinson, V.: Does it matter where you work? A comparison of how three work venues (traditional office, virtual office, and home office) influence aspects of work and personal/family life. J. Vocat. Behav. 63(2), 220–241 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-8791(03)00042-3
Jacukowicz, A., Merecz-Kot, D.: Work-related Internet use as a threat to work-life balance – a comparison between the emerging on-line professions and traditional office work. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 33(1), 21–33 (2020). https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01494
Kay, A.C., Wheeler, S., Bargh, J.A., Ross, L.: Material priming: the influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 95(1), 83–96 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.06.003
Kaye, L.K., Orben, A., Ellis, D.A., Hunter, S.C., Houghton, S.: The conceptual and methodological mayhem of “screen-time.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(10), 3661 (2020). https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/u4hqn
Keyes, C.L., Annas, J.: Feeling good and functioning well: distinctive concepts in ancient philosophy and contemporary science. J. Posit. Psychol. 4(3), 197–201 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760902844228
Klapperich, H., et al.: Mind the gap; a social practice approach to wellbeing-driven design. In: Petermans, A., Cain, R. (eds.) Design for Wellbeing: An Applied Approach. Routledge, London (2019)
Klein, A.: El creciente uso de las nuevas technologias en adultos mayores. Estud. Interdisc. sobre Envelhecimento 22(2), 95–111 (2017). https://doi.org/10.22456/2316-2171.61313
Kulkarni, U., Robles-Flores, J., Popovič, A.: Business intelligence capability: the effect of top management and the mediating roles of user participation and analytical decision making orientation. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 18(7), 516–541 (2017). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00462
Kushlev, K., Dunn, E.W.: Checking email less frequently reduces stress. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43, 220–228 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.005
Lee, S.Y., Brand, J.L.: Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes. J. Environ. Psychol. 25(3), 323–333 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.001
Mann, S., Holdsworth, L.: The psychological impact of teleworking: stress, emotions and health. New Technol. Work Employ. 18(3), 196–211 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005x.00121
Meng, J., Martinez, L., Holmstrom, A., Chung, M., Cox, J.: Research on social networking sites and social support from 2004 to 2015: a narrative review and directions for future research. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 20(1), 44–51 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0325
Messenger, M., Vargas Llave, O., Gschwind, L., Boehmer, S., Vermeylen, G., Wilkens, M.: Working anytime, anywhere: the effects on the world of work. Publications Office of the European Union (2017)
Michel, A.: Transcending socialization. Adm. Sci. Q. 56(3), 325–368 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212437519
Moen, P., Kelly, E.L., Lam, J.: Healthy work revisited: do changes in time strain predict well-being? J. Occup. Health Psychol. 18(2), 157–172 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031804
Molino, M., et al.: Wellbeing costs of technology use during Covid-19 remote working: an investigation using the Italian translation of the technostress creators scale. Sustainability 12(15), 5911 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155911
Montag, C., Diefenbach, S.: Towards homo digitalis: important research issues for psychology and the neurosciences at the dawn of the internet of things and the digital society. Sustainability 10(2), 415 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020415
Montag, C., Widenhorn-Müller, K., Panksepp, J., Kiefer, M.: Individual differences in Affective Neuroscience Personality Scale (ANPS) primary emotional traits and depressive tendencies. Compr. Psychiatry 73, 136–142 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.11.007
Moskaliuk, J., Burmeister, C.P., Landkammer, F., Renner, B., Cress, U.: Environmental effects on cognition and decision making of knowledge workers. J. Environ. Psychol. 49, 43–54 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.12.001
Nah, F.-H., Siau, K.: COVID-19 Pandemic – role of technology in transforming business to the new normal. In: Stephanidis, C., et al. (eds.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12427, pp. 585–600. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60152-2_43
Odgers, C.L., Jensen, M.R.: Annual research review: adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 61(3), 336–348 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13190
Orben, A.: Teenagers, screens and social media: a narrative review of reviews and key studies. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 55(4), 407–414 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01825-4
Orhan, M.A., Rijsman, J.B., Van Dijk, G.M.: Invisible, therefore isolated: comparative effects of team virtuality with task virtuality on workplace isolation and work outcomes. Rev. Psicol. Trabajo las Organ. 32(2), 109–122 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2016.02.002
Orlikowski, W.J.: The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 3(3), 398–427 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
Parker, S.K.: Beyond motivation: job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 65(1), 661–691 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115208
Peters, D., Ahmadpour, N., Calvo, R.A.: Tools for wellbeing-supportive design: features, characteristics, and prototypes. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 4(3), 40 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030040
Peters, D., Calvo, R.A., Ryan, R.M.: Designing for motivation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience. Front. Psychol. 9, 797 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797
Przybylski, A.K., Weinstein, N.: Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 30(3), 237–246 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512453827
Pérez, V.: Aproximación a la investigación psicológica en Internet y redes sociales. Summa Psicol. 15(1), 98–105 (2018). https://doi.org/10.18774/448x.2018.15.vp
Rogerson, S., Meir, R., Crowley-McHattan, Z., McEwen, K., Pastoors, R.: A randomized controlled pilot trial investigating the impact of a workplace resilience program during a time of significant organizational change. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 58(4), 329–334 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000000677
Rughiniş, C., Rughiniş, R., Matei, Ş: A touching app voice thinking about ethics of persuasive technology through an analysis of mobile smoking-cessation apps. Ethics Inf. Technol. 17(4), 295–309 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9385-1
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Guilford Publications, New York (2017)
Schalock, R.L., Verdugo, M.A., Alonso, M.A., Braddock, D.L.: Handbook on Quality of Life for Human Service Practitioners. Amer Assn on Intellectual & Devel, Washington, DC (2002)
Scholz, R., et al.: Unintended side effects of the digital transition: European scientists’ messages from a proposition-based expert round table. Sustainability 10(6), 2001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062001
Sen, A.: Equality of what? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values, I, pp. 197–220, 22 May 1979. https://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Sen-1979_Equality-of-What.pdf
Sheldon, K.M., Elliot, A.J., Kim, Y., Kasser, T.: What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 80(2), 325–339 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.325
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., Watson, M.: The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. Sage Publications, London (2012)
Small, G., et al.: Brain health consequences of digital technology use. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 22(2), 179–187 (2020). https://doi.org/10.31887/dcns.2020.22.2/gsmall
Song, Y., Gao, J.: Does telework stress employees out? A study on working at home and subjective well-being for wage/salary workers. J. Happiness Stud. 21(7), 2649–2668 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00196-6
Sparrow, B., Liu, J., Wegner, D.M.: Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science 333(6043), 776–778 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
Specker Sullivan, L., Reiner, P.B.: Digital wellness and persuasive technologies. SSRN Electron. J. (2019). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3394952
Stephenson, L.E., Bauer, S.C.: The role of isolation in predicting new principals’ burnout. Int. J. Educ. Policy Leadersh. 5(9), 1–17 (2010). https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2010v5n9a275
Taddeo, M.: The struggle between liberties and authorities in the information age. Sci. Eng. Ethics 21(5), 1125–1138 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9586-0
Tarafdar, M., Gupta, A., Turel, O.: The dark side of information technology use. Inf. Syst. J. 23(3), 269–275 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12015
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, T.S.: Impact of technostress on end-user satisfaction and performance. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 27(3), 303–334 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222270311
Tay, L., Diener, E.: Needs and subjective well-being around the world. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101(2), 354–365 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023779
Taylor, H., Fieldman, G., Altman, Y.: E-mail at work: a cause for concern? The implications of the new communication technologies for health, wellbeing and productivity at work. J. Organ. Transf. Soc. Change 5(2), 159–173 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1386/jots.5.2.159_1
Thulin, E., Vilhelmson, B., Johansson, M.: New telework, time pressure, and time use control in everyday life. Sustainability 11(11), 3067 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113067
Toscano, F., Zappalà, S.: Social isolation and stress as predictors of productivity perception and remote work satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of concern about the virus in a moderated double mediation. Sustainability 12(23), 9804 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239804
Twenge, J.M., Campbell, W.K.: Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents: evidence from a population-based study. Prevent. Med. Rep. 12, 271–283 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.003
Vallée, T., Sedki, K., Despres, S., Jaulant, M., Tabia, K., Ugon, A.: On personalization in IoT. In: International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence. 2016 Presented at CSCI 2016, Las Vegas, USA (2016)
Vanden Abeele, M.M.: Digital wellbeing as a dynamic construct. Commun. Theory (2020). https://academic.oup.com/ct/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/ct/qtaa024/5927565
Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., Kross, E.: Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 11(1), 274–302 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033
Wang, W., Zhao, Y., Qiu, L., Zhu, Y.: Effects of emoticons on the acceptance of negative feedback in computer-mediated communication. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 15(8), 454–483 (2014). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00370
Weinert, C., Maier, C., Laumer, S., Weitzel, T.: Does teleworking negatively influence IT professionals? In: Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Conference on Computers and People Research - SIGSIM-CPR 2014 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2599990.2600011
West, R.L., Turner, L.H.: Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application. McGraw-Hill, Boston (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Galanxhi, H., Nah, F.FH. (2021). Addressing the “Unseens”: Digital Wellbeing in the Remote Workplace. In: Nah, F.FH., Siau, K. (eds) HCI in Business, Government and Organizations. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12783. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77750-0_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77750-0_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77749-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77750-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)