Skip to main content

Enhanced Product Presentation with Augmented Reality: The Role of Affective Reactions and Authenticity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI in Business, Government and Organizations (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12783))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3368 Accesses

Abstract

When shopping online, it is usually not possible to view products in the same way as you are used to when shopping offline. With augmented reality (AR), it is not only possible to view the product in detail, but also to view it at home in the real environment. Such an AR application sets stimuli that can affect the users and their purchase decision and Word-of-mouth intention. In this work, we assume that when viewing a product in AR, not only affective internal states but also cognitive perception processes have an impact on purchase decision and Word-of-mouth intention. While positive affective reactions have already been studied in the context of AR, this paper will also describe inner cognitive perception processes, using the construct of AR authenticity. To test these assumptions, a study was conducted with 155 participants. The results show that both the purchase intention and the Word-of-mouth intention are influenced by the constructs of positive affective reactions and AR authenticity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Algharabat, R., Dennis, C.: Modelling the impact of 3D authenticity and 3D telepresence on behavioural intention for an online retailer. In: Morschett, D., Rudolph, T., Schnedlitz, P., Schramm-Klein, H., Swoboda, B. (eds.) European Retail Research, pp. 93–109. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6147-1_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., MacIntyre, B.: Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 21, 34–47 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/38.963459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, T.J.: Spreading the word: investigating antecedents of consumers’ positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 33, 123–138 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304268417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, H.-J., Eckman, M., Yan, R.-N.: Application of the Stimulus-Organism-Response model to the retail environment: the role of hedonic motivation in impulse buying behavior. Int. Rev. Retail Distrib. Consum. Res. 21, 233–249 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2011.578798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chin, W.W.: The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides, G.A. (ed.) Modern Methods for Business Research, pp. 295–336. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cyr, D., Head, M., Ivanov, A.: Perceived interactivity leading to e-loyalty: development of a model for cognitive–affective user responses. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 67, 850–869 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dacko, S.G.: Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 124, 243–256 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. de Ruyter, K., Heller, J., Hilken, T., Chylinski, M., Keeling, D.I., Mahr, D.: Seeing with the customer’s eye: exploring the challenges and opportunities of AR advertising. J. Advert. 49, 109–124 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1740123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Donovan, R., Rossiter, J.: Store atmosphere: an environmental psychology approach. J. Retail. 58, 34–57 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eroglu, S.A., Machleit, K.A., Davis, L.M.: Atmospheric qualities of online retailing a conceptual model and implications. J. Bus. Res. 54, 177–184 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39 (1981). https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Geisser, S.: A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika 61(1), 101 (1974). https://doi.org/10.2307/2334290

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Geisser, S.: The predictive sample reuse method with applications. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 70(350), 320–328 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gervautz, M., Schmalstieg, D.: Anywhere interfaces using handheld augmented reality. Computer 45, 26–31 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hair, J.F., Hult, T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heller, J., Chylinski, M., de Ruyter, K., Mahr, D., Keeling, D.I.: Let me imagine that for you: transforming the retail frontline through augmenting customer mental imagery ability. J. Retail. 95, 94–114 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2019.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Henseler, J., Hubona, G., Ray, P.A.: Using PLS path modeling in new technology re-search: updated guidelines. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116(1), 2–20 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43(1), 115–135 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hilken, T., de Ruyter, K., Chylinski, M., Mahr, D., Keeling, D.I.: Augmenting the eye of the beholder: exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 45(6), 884–905 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0541-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hilken, T., Keeling, D.I., de Ruyter, K., Mahr, D., Chylinski, M.: Seeing eye to eye: social augmented reality and shared decision making in the marketplace. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 48(2), 143–164 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00688-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P.: Flow online: lessons learned and future prospects. J. Interact. Mark. 23, 23–34 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2008.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu, L.-T., Bentler, P.M.: Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 6(1), 1–55 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang, E.: Online experiences and virtual goods purchase intention. Internet Res. 22, 252–274 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211235644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang, T.-L., Liao, S.: A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: the moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electron. Commer. Res. 15(2), 269–295 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-014-9163-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Israel, K., Zerres, C., Tscheulin, D.K.: Presenting hotels in virtual reality: does it influence the booking intention? J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 10, 443–463 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-03-2018-0020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Javornik, A.: Augmented reality: research agenda for studying the impact of its media characteristics on consumer behaviour. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 30, 252–261 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Javornik, A.: ‘It’s an illusion, but it looks real!’ consumer affective, cognitive and behavioural responses to augmented reality applications. J. Mark. Manag. 32, 987–1011 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1174726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Javornik, A., Rogers, Y., Moutinho, A.M., Freeman, R.: Revealing the shopper experience of using a ‘magic mirror’ augmented reality make-up application. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, DIS 2016, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, pp. 871–882 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang, Z., Chan, J., Tan, B., Chua, W.: Effects of interactivity on website involvement and purchase intention. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 11(1), 34–59 (2010). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Katawetawaraks, C., Wang, C.L.: Online shopper behavior: influences of online shopping decision. Asian J. Bus. Res. 1 (2011). https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.110012

  32. Kim, H.-C., Hyun, M.Y.: Predicting the use of smartphone-based Augmented Reality (AR): does telepresence really help? Comput. Hum. Behav. 59, 28–38 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim, J., Lennon, S.J.: Effects of reputation and website quality on online consumers’ emotion, perceived risk and purchase intention: based on the stimulus-organism-response model. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 7, 33–56 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/17505931311316734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kühn, S.W., Petzer, D.J.: Fostering purchase intentions toward online retailer websites in an emerging market: an S-O-R perspective. J. Internet Commer. 17, 255–282 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2018.1463799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J.: Interactive advertising and presence: a framework. J. Interact. Advert. 1, 56–65 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mehrabian, A., Russell, J.A.: An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Menon, S., Kahn, B.: Cross-category effects of induced arousal and pleasure on the internet shopping experience. J. Retail. 78, 31–40 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00064-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Park, J., Stoel, L., Lennon, S.J.: Cognitive, affective and conative responses to visual simulation: the effects of rotation in online product presentation. J. Consum. Behav. 7, 72–87 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Park, M., Yoo, J.: Effects of perceived interactivity of augmented reality on consumer responses: a mental imagery perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 52 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101912

  41. Rese, A., Baier, D., Geyer-Schulz, A., Schreiber, S.: How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers: a comparative analysis using scales and opinions. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 124, 306–319 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Riar, M., Korbel, J.J., Xi, N., Zarnekow, R., Hamari, J.: The use of augmented reality in retail: a review of literature. In: Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.-M.: SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Song, J.H., Zinkhan, G.M.: Determinants of perceived web site interactivity. J. Mark. 72, 99–113 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.2.99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Stone, M.: Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 36(2), 111–147 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  46. van Noort, G., Voorveld, H.A.M., van Reijmersdal, E.A.: Interactivity in brand web sites: cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses explained by consumers’ online flow experience. J. Interact. Mark. 26, 223–234 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2011.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Watson, A., Alexander, B., Salavati, L.: The impact of experiential augmented reality applications on fashion purchase intention. IJRDM 48, 433–451 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-06-2017-0117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yoo, J., Kim, M.: The effects of online product presentation on consumer responses: a mental imagery perspective. J. Bus. Res. 67, 2464–2472 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yusuf, A., Che Hussin, A., Busalim, A.: Influence of e-WOM engagement on consumer purchase intention in social commerce. J. Serv. Mark. 32, 493–504 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2017-0031

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Zerres .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Firnkes, J.C., Zerres, C., Israel, K. (2021). Enhanced Product Presentation with Augmented Reality: The Role of Affective Reactions and Authenticity. In: Nah, F.FH., Siau, K. (eds) HCI in Business, Government and Organizations. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12783. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77750-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77750-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77749-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77750-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics