Skip to main content

Designing the Empathetic Research IoT Network (ERIN) Chatbot for Mental Health Resources

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI in Business, Government and Organizations (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12783))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Grounded in the user experience driven innovation (UXDI) framework, we designed and developed a chatbot, ERIN, to help college students with finding resources about sensitive issues such as mental health and Title IX. ERIN was designed to be accessed via different devices. Throughout the design process, the analysis of user interviews suggested that the service experience of the chatbot and its adoption may strongly be influenced by the medium through which it is accessed. To test this possibility, we conducted an experiment comparing user reactions to the chatbot using two different devices: laptop and smart phone. The preliminary results showed that user experience of the chatbot was almost significantly better in the mobile group and people in that group were almost significantly more likely to adopt the chatbot. These results and their implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adipat, B., Zhang, D., Zhou, L.: The effects of tree-view based presentation adaptation on mobile web browsing. MIS Q. 99–121 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Albert, W., Tullis, T.: Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Newnes (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bangor, A., Kortum, P., Miller, J.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 4, 114–123 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brandtzaeg, P., Følstad, A.: Why people use chatbots. In: Kompatsiaris, I., et al. (eds.) INSCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10673, pp. 377–392. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bröhl, C., Rasche, P., Jablonski, J., Theis, S., Wille, M., Mertens, A.: Desktop PC, tablet PC, or smartphone? An analysis of use preferences in daily activities for different technology generations of a worldwide sample. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) ITAP 2018. LNCS, vol. 10926, pp. 3–20. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92034-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35, 982–1003 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Gennaro, M., Krumhuber, E.G., Lucas, G.: Effectiveness of an empathic chatbot in combating adverse effects of social exclusion on mood. Front. Psychol. 10, 3061 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Djamasbi, S., Strong, D.: User experience-driven innovation – theory and practice: introduction to special issue. AIS Trans. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 11, 208–214 (2019). https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Djamasbi, S., Tulu, B., Norouzi Nia, J., Aberdale, A., Lee, C., Muehlschlegel, S.: Using eye tracking to assess the navigation efficacy of a medical proxy decision tool. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Fidopiastis, C.M. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11580, pp. 143–152. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22419-6_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hong, S.-J., Tam, K.Y.: Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: the case of mobile data services. Inf. Syst. Res. 17, 162–179 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jain, P., Djamasbi, S., Hall-Phillips, A.: The impact of feedback design on cognitive effort, usability, and technology use. In: Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jain, P., Djamasbi, S., Wyatt, J.: Creating value with proto-research persona development. In: Nah, F.F.-H., Siau, K. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11589, pp. 72–82. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22338-0_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, J., Kim, Y., Kim, B., Yun, S., Kim, M., Lee, J.: Can a machine tend to teenagers’ emotional needs? A study with conversational agents. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–6 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, Y.-C., Yamashita, N., Huang, Y., Fu, W.: “I Hear You, I Feel You”: encouraging deep self-disclosure through a chatbot. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–12 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, Z., et al.: CAiRE: an end-to-end empathetic chatbot. In: AAAI, pp. 13622–13623 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, F.P., Vandome, A.F., McBrewster, J.: Levenshtein distance: information theory, computer science, string (computer science), string metric, damerau? Levenshtein distance, spell checker, hamming distance (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. NAMI. https://nami.org/mhstats

  18. Park, H., Lee, J.: Can a conversational agent lower sexual violence victims’ burden of self-disclosure? In: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–8 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Park, M., Aiken, M., Salvador, L.: How do humans interact with chatbots? An analysis of transcripts. Int. J. Manag. Inf. Technol. 14, 3338–3350 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Persons, B.: Empathetic Conversational Agent Assisting with Title IX Cases and Digital Counseling. User Experience and Decision-Making Lab, vol. IQP. Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/tix_dis.html

  22. U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/open-investigations/tix.html

  23. Wang, B.: Interactive decision aids for consumer decision making in e-commerce: the influence of perceived strategy restrictiveness. MIS Q. 33(2), 293–320 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2307/20650293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson, E.V., Djamasbi, S.: Measuring mobile user experience instruments for research and practice. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 44, 8 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prateek Jain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Persons, B., Jain, P., Chagnon, C., Djamasbi, S. (2021). Designing the Empathetic Research IoT Network (ERIN) Chatbot for Mental Health Resources. In: Nah, F.FH., Siau, K. (eds) HCI in Business, Government and Organizations. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12783. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77750-0_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77750-0_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77749-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77750-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics