Skip to main content

Helping Instructor Pilots Detect and Respond to Engagement Lapses in Simulations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Adaptive Instructional Systems. Adaptation Strategies and Methods (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12793))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Adapting training in real time can be challenging for instructors. Real-time simulation can present rapid sequences of events, making it difficult for an instructor to attribute errors or omissions to specific underling gaps in skills and knowledge. Monitoring multiple students simultaneously imposes additional attentional workload on an instructor. This challenge can be further exacerbated when an instructor’s view of the student is obscured by virtual reality (VR) equipment. To support instructors’ ability to adapt training, Eduworks and USC’s Institute for Creative Technologies are developing machine learning (ML) models that can measure user engagement during training simulations and offer recommendations for restoring lapses in engagement. We have created a system, called the Observational Motivation and Engagement Generalized Appliance (OMEGA), which we tested in the context of a new U.S. Air Force approach to Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (SUPT) called Pilot Training Next (PTN). PTN integrates traditional flying sorties with VR-enabled ground-based training devices to achieve training efficiencies, improve readiness, and increase throughput. The virtual environment provides a rich source of raw data that machine learning models can use to associate user activity with user engagement. We created a testbed for data capture to construct the ML models, based on theoretical foundations we developed previously. Our research explores OMEGA’s potential to help alert an instructor pilot (IP) to student distraction by flagging attention and engagement lapses. Our hypothesis is that OMEGA could help an IP adapt learning, and potentially manage multiple students at the same time, with alerts of lapsed attention and recommendations for restoring engagement. To test this hypothesis, we ran pilots through multiple PTN scenarios to create data for training the model. In this paper, we report on work to create machine learning models using three different techniques, and present model performance data using standard machine learning metrics. We discuss the modeling approach used to generate instructor recommendations. Future work will present results from a formative evaluation using instructor pilots. These early findings provide preliminary validation for the use of ML models for learning to detect engagement from the rich data sources characteristic of virtual environments. These findings will be applicable across a broad range of conventional and VR training applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sottilare, R.A., Goodwin, G.A.: Adaptive instructional methods to accelerate learning and enhance learning capacity. In: International Defense & Homeland Security Simulation Workshop of the I3M Conference (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hu, P.J.H., Hui, W.: Examining the role of learning engagement in technology-mediated learning and its effects on learning effectiveness and satisfaction. Decis. Support Syst. 53(4), 782–792 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chi, M.T., Wylie, R.: The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educ. Psychol. 49(4), 219–243 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Core, M.G., Georgila, K., Nye, B.D., Auerbach, D., Liu, Z.F., DiNinni, R.: Learning, adaptive support, student traits, and engagement in scenario-based learning. In: I/ITSEC (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Porter, L.W., Lawler, E.E.: Managerial attitudes and performance. R.D. Irwin, Homewood (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gawel, J.E.: Herzberg’s theory of motivation and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 5(11), 3 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pintrich, P.R.: Multiple goals, multiple pathways: the role of goal orientation in learning & achievement. J. Educ. Psych. 92(3), 544 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.: Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learn. Instr. 22(2), 145–157 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Roll, I., Koedinger, K.R.: Developing a generalizable detector of when students game the system. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 18(3), 287–314 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bell, B., Kelsey, E., Nye, B. Monitoring engagement and motivation across learning environments. In: Proceedings of the 2019 MODSIM World Conference, Norfolk, VA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harrivel, A.R., et al.: Prediction of cognitive states during flight simulation using multimodal psychophysiological sensing. In: AIAA Information Systems-AIAA Infotech, p. 1135 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wickens, C.D.: Attentional tunneling and task management. In: 2005 International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, p. 812 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cummings, M.L., Mastracchio, C., Thornburg, K.M., Mkrtchyan, A.: Boredom and distraction in multiple unmanned vehicle supervisory control. Interact. Comput. 25(1), 34–47 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Casner, S.M., Schooler, J.W.: Vigilance impossible: diligence, distraction, and daydreaming all lead to failures in a practical monitoring task. Conscious. Cogn. 35, 33–41 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Bell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bell, B., Bennett, W.W., Nye, B., Kelsey, E. (2021). Helping Instructor Pilots Detect and Respond to Engagement Lapses in Simulations. In: Sottilare, R.A., Schwarz, J. (eds) Adaptive Instructional Systems. Adaptation Strategies and Methods. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12793. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77873-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77873-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77872-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77873-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics