Skip to main content

Co-evolution of Knowledge Diffusion and Absorption: A Simulation-Based Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science – ICCS 2021 (ICCS 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12742))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1528 Accesses

Abstract

The paper utilizes agent-based simulations to study diffusion and absorption of knowledge. The causal relation of diffusion on absorption is established in order. The process of diffusion and absorption of knowledge is governed by network structure and the dynamics of the recurring influence, conceptualized and modeled as legitimacy, credibility, and strategic complementarity; again a causal relation between the three in order. If not stationary, the agents can also move to acquire either random walk or profile-based mobility modes. Therefore, the co-evolution of network structure due to the mobility of the agents and the dynamics of the recurring influence of ever-changing neighborhood is also modeled. The simulation results reveal that – (i) higher thresholds for legitimacy and credibility determine slower, (ii) higher number of early adopters results into faster, and (iii) a scheduled and repeated mobility (the profile-based mobility) results in faster – absorption of knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Al-Maskari, S., Zia, K., Muhammad, A., Saini, D.K.: Impact of mobility mode on innovation dissemination: an agent-based simulation modeling. In: Manoonpong, P., Larsen, J.C., Xiong, X., Hallam, J., Triesch, J. (eds.) SAB 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10994, pp. 3–14. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97628-0_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Althoff, T., Jindal, P., Leskovec, J.: Online actions with offline impact: How online social networks influence online and offline user behavior. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 537–546. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, R.A., et al.: Transmission dynamics and epidemiology of BSE in british cattle. Nature 382(6594), 779 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Backlund, V.P., Saramäki, J., Pan, R.K.: Effects of temporal correlations on cascades: threshold models on temporal networks. Phys. Rev. E 89(6), 062815 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., Adamic, L.: The role of social networks in information diffusion. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 519–528. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bapna, R., Gupta, A., Rice, S., Sundararajan, A.: Trust and the strength of ties in online social networks: an exploratory field experiment. MIS Q. Manage. Inf. Syst. 41(1), 115–130 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bonabeau, E.: Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 99(suppl 3), 7280–7287 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burt, R.S.: Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Centola, D., Macy, M.: Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. Am. J. Soc. 113(3), 702–734 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng, J., Adamic, L.A., Kleinberg, J.M., Leskovec, J.: Do cascades recur? In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 671–681. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Collins, R.: Emotional energy as the common denominator of rational action. Rationality Soc. 5(2), 203–230 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cowan, R., Jonard, N.: Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 28(8), 1557–1575 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gee, L.K., Jones, J., Burke, M.: Social networks and labor markets: how strong ties relate to job finding on facebook’s social network. J. Labor Econ. 35(2), 485–518 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78(6), 1360–1380 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenwood, S., Perrin, A., Duggan, M.: Social media update 2016. Pew Res. Center 11, 83 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hill, S., Provost, F., Volinsky, C.: Network-based marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer networks. Stat. Sci. 21(2), 256–276 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jia, P., MirTabatabaei, A., Friedkin, N.E., Bullo, F.: Opinion dynamics and the evolution of social power in influence networks. SIAM Rev. 57(3), 367–397 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Kandhway, K., Kuri, J.: Using node centrality and optimal control to maximize information diffusion in social networks. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 47(7), 1099–1110 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kooti, F., Mason, W.A., Gummadi, K.P., Cha, M.: Predicting emerging social conventions in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 445–454. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Levin, D.Z., Cross, R.: The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Manage. Sci. 50(11), 1477–1490 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mishori, R., Singh, L.O., Levy, B., Newport, C.: Mapping physician twitter networks: describing how they work as a first step in understanding connectivity, information flow, and message diffusion. J. Med. Internet Res. 16(4), e107 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Olson, M.: The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Second Printing with New Preface and Appendix, vol. 124. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Perry-Smith, J.E.: Social yet creative: the role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Manage. J. 49(1), 85–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Phelps, C., Heidl, R., Wadhwa, A.: Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: a review and research agenda. J. Manage. 38(4), 1115–1166 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rogers, E.M., Shoemaker, F.F.: Communication of innovations; a cross-cultural approach (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shi, Z., Rui, H., Whinston, A.B.: Content sharing in a social broadcasting environment: evidence from twitter. MIS Q. 38(1), 123–142 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Steinert-Threlkeld, Z.C.: Spontaneous collective action: peripheral mobilization during the Arab spring. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 111(2), 379–403 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, Y., Wu, J.: Social-tie-based information dissemination in mobile opportunistic social networks. In: 2013 IEEE 14th International Symposium and Workshops on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Watts, D.J., Dodds, P.S.: Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J. Consum. Res. 34(4), 441–458 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yang, Yu., Chen, E., Liu, Q., Xiang, B., Xu, T., Shad, S.A.: On approximation of real-world influence spread. In: Flach, P.A., De Bie, T., Cristianini, N. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7524, pp. 548–564. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33486-3_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kashif Zia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zia, K., Farooq, U., Al-Maskari, S., Shafi, M. (2021). Co-evolution of Knowledge Diffusion and Absorption: A Simulation-Based Analysis. In: Paszynski, M., Kranzlmüller, D., Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., Dongarra, J.J., Sloot, P.M.A. (eds) Computational Science – ICCS 2021. ICCS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12742. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77961-0_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77961-0_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77960-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77961-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics