Abstract
This paper shows how a gradient-free optimization method is used to improve the prediction capabilities of wildfire progression by estimating the wind conditions driving a FARSITE wildfire model. To characterize the performance of the prediction of the perimeter as a function of the wind conditions, an uncertainty weighting is applied to each vertex of the measured fire perimeter and a weighted least-squares error is computed between the predicted and measured fire perimeter. In addition, interpolation of the measured fire perimeter and its uncertainty is adopted to match the number of vertices on the predicted and measured fire perimeter. The gradient-free optimization based on iterative refined gridding provides robustness to intermittent erroneous results produced by FARSITE and quickly find optimal wind conditions by paralleling the wildfire model calculations. Results on wind condition estimation are illustrated on two historical wildfire events: the 2019 Maria fire that burned south of the community of Santa Paula in the area of Somis, CA, and the 2019 Cave fire that started in the Santa Ynez Mountains of Santa Barbara County.
Work is supported by WIFIRE Commons and funded by NSF 2040676 under the Convergence Accelerator program.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cheney, N., Gould, J., Catchpole, W.: The influence of fuel, weather and fire shape variables on fire-spread in grasslands. Int. J. Wildland Fire 3(1), 31–44 (1993)
Cruz, M.G., Hurley, R.J., Bessell, R., Sullivan, A.L.: Fire behaviour in wheat crops-effect of fuel structure on rate of fire spread. Int. J. Wildland Fire 29(3), 258–271 (2020)
Cruz, M.G., Sullivan, A.L., Gould, J.S.: The effect of fuel bed height in grass fire spread: addressing the findings and recommendations of Moinuddin et al. Int. J. Wildland Fire 30, 215 (2018)
Cruz, M.G., Sullivan, A.L., Gould, J.S., Hurley, R.J., Plucinski, M.P.: Got to burn to learn: the effect of fuel load on grassland fire behaviour and its management implications. Int. J. Wildland Fire 27(11), 727–741 (2018)
Douglas, C.C., et al.: Demonstrating the validity of a wildfire DDDAS. In: Alexandrov, V.N., van Albada, G.D., Sloot, P.M.A., Dongarra, J. (eds.) ICCS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3993, pp. 522–529. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11758532_69
Fang, H., Srivas, T., de Callafon, R.A., Haile, M.A.: Ensemble-based simultaneous input and state estimation for nonlinear dynamic systems with application to wildfire data assimilation. Control Eng. Pract. 63, 104–115 (2017)
Finney, M.A.: FARSITE, Fire Area Simulator - model development and evaluation, vol. 4. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station (1998)
Kolden, C.A., Weisberg, P.J.: Assessing accuracy of manually-mapped wildfire perimeters in topographically dissected areas. Fire Ecol. 3, 22–31 (2007)
Lin, Z., Liu, H.H., Wotton, M.: Kalman filter-based large-scale wildfire monitoring with a system of UAVs. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 66(1), 606–615 (2018)
Mandel, J., et al.: Towards a dynamic data driven application system for wildfire simulation. In: Sunderam, V.S., van Albada, G.D., Sloot, P.M.A., Dongarra, J.J. (eds.) ICCS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3515, pp. 632–639. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11428848_82
Mandel, J., et al.: A note on dynamic data driven wildfire modeling. In: Bubak, M., van Albada, G.D., Sloot, P.M.A., Dongarra, J. (eds.) ICCS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3038, pp. 725–731. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24688-6_94
Rothermel, R.C.: A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels, vol. 115. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, United\(\ldots \) (1972)
Srivas, T., Artés, T., De Callafon, R.A., Altintas, I.: Wildfire spread prediction and assimilation for farsite using ensemble Kalman filtering. Procedia Comput. Sci. 80, 897–908 (2016)
Srivas, T., de Callafon, R.A., Crawl, D., Altintas, I.: Data assimilation of wildfires with fuel adjustment factors in farsite using ensemble Kalman filtering. Procedia Comput. Sci. 108, 1572–1581 (2017)
Subramanian, A., Tan, L., de Callafon, R.A., Crawl, D., Altintas, I.: Recursive updates of wildfire perimeters using barrier points and ensemble Kalman filtering. In: Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., et al. (eds.) ICCS 2020. LNCS, vol. 12142, pp. 225–236. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50433-5_18
Xing, Z., Zhang, Y., Su, C.Y., Qu, Y., Yu, Z.: Kalman filter-based wind estimation for forest fire monitoring with a quadrotor UAV. In: 2019 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA), pp. 783–788. IEEE (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tan, L., de Callafon, R.A., Block, J., Crawl, D., Altıntaş, I. (2021). Improving Wildfire Simulations by Estimation of Wildfire Wind Conditions from Fire Perimeter Measurements. In: Paszynski, M., Kranzlmüller, D., Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., Dongarra, J.J., Sloot, P.M. (eds) Computational Science – ICCS 2021. ICCS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12746. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77977-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77977-1_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77976-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77977-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)