Skip to main content

Smart City Concept Based on Cyber-Physical Social Systems with Hierarchical Ethical Agents Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Access to Media, Learning and Assistive Environments (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12769))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A smart city is considered a sustainable city that manages needed resources and makes autonomous decisions to improve the quality of life of its citizens. On the other hand, Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) have been implemented as isolated systems inside the city. For instance, the traffic lights, autonomous navigation for cars, and so on. Instead, consider a smart city with an integrated CPS for independent blocks that can be interconnected in a central unit. However, when a CPS makes decisions about the integration of ethical concepts based on human perception, social space must be added, and so a CPS must be transformed into a Cyber-Physical Social System (CPSS). Furthermore, a new type of social interaction between all the elements in a CPSS within a smart city presents human behavioral challenges such as virtual-morality. This paper first proposes an Artificial Moral Agent with machine learning algorithms to regulate the interaction within the CPSS, adding itself to all the subsystems’ communication. Additionally, a moral agent structure is proposed with a morality filter as its fundamental component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cocchia, A.: Smart and digital city: a systematic literature review. In: Dameri, R.P., Rosenthal-Sabroux, C. (eds.) Smart City. PI, pp. 13–43. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Dameri, R.P., Rosenthal-Sabroux, C.: Smart city and value creation. In: Dameri, R.P., Rosenthal-Sabroux, C. (eds.) Smart City. PI, pp. 1–12. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Satoh, K., Takahashi, T., Yamada, T., Yoshikawa, A., Terano, T.: Evacuation Behaviors in an Emergency Station by Agent-Based Approach, pp. 236–241 (2009). http://www.iadisportal.org/digital-library/evacuation-behaviors-in-an-emergency-station-by-agent-based-approach

  5. Taboada, M., Cabrera, E., Iglesias, M.L., Epelde, F., Luque, E.: An Agent-based decision support system for hospitals emergency departments. Procedia Comput. Sci. 4, 1870–1879 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2011.04.203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vigueras, G., Orduña, J.M., Lozano, M., Jégou, Y.: A scalable multiagent system architecture for interactive applications. Sci. Comput. Program. 78(6), 715–724 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2011.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. KlĂĽgl, F., Bazzan, A.L.C.: Route decision behaviour in a commuting scenario: simple heuristics adaptation and effect of traffic forecast. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 7(1), 1 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eitel-Porter, R.: Beyond the promise: implementing ethical AI. AI Ethics 1(1), 73–80 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00011-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmed, S.H., Kim, G., Kim, D.: Cyber physical system: architecture, applications and research challenges. In: 2013 IFIP Wireless Days (WD), pp. 1–5. Valencia, Spain (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/wd.2013.6686528

  10. Awoyera, O.O., Sacko, O., Darboe, O., Cynthia, O.C.: Anfis-based intelligent traffic control system (ITCS) for developing cities. J. Traffic Logistics Eng. 7(1) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, F.Y.: The emergence of intelligent enterprises: from CPS to CPSS. IEEE Intell. Syst. 25(4), 85–88 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chourabi, H., et al.: Understanding smart cities: an integrative framework. In: 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 2289–2297 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.615

  13. Ponce, P., Meier, A., Miranda, J., Molina, A., Peffer, T.: The next generation of social products based on sensing, smart and sustainable (S3) features: a smart thermostat as case study. In: 9th IFAC Conference on Manufacturing Modelling, Management and Control, p. 6 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ponce, P., Meier, A., Mendez, J., Peffer, T., Molina, A., Mata, O.: Tailored gamification and serious game framework based on fuzzy logic for saving energy in smart thermostats. J. Clean. Prod. 21167 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121167

  15. Mendez, J.I., et al.: Empower saving energy into smart homes using a gamification structure by social products. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), pp. 1–7. Las Vegas, NV, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/icce46568.2020.9043174

  16. Zeng, J., Yang, L.T., Lin, M., Ning, H., Ma, J.: A survey: cyber-physical-social systems and their system-level design methodology. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 105, 1028–1042 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.06.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mata, O., Ponce, P., Méndez, I., Molina, A., Meier, A., Peffer, T.: A model using artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic for knowing the consumer on smart thermostats as a S3product. In: Martínez-Villaseñor, L., Batyrshin, I., Marín-Hernández, A. (eds.) MICAI 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11835, pp. 430–439. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33749-0_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Méndez, J.I., Mata, O., Ponce, P., Meier, A., Peffer, T., Molina, A.: Multi-sensor system, gamification, and artificial intelligence for benefit elderly people. In: Ponce, H., Martínez-Villaseñor, L., Brieva, J., Moya-Albor, E. (eds.) Challenges and Trends in Multimodal Fall Detection for Healthcare. SSDC, vol. 273, pp. 207–235. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38748-8_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Méndez, J.I., Ponce, P., Meier, A., Peffer, T., Mata, O., Molina, A.: Framework for promoting social interaction and physical activity in elderly people using gamification and fuzzy logic strategy. In: 2019 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP), pp. 1–5. Ottawa, ON, Canada (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/globalsip45357.2019.8969110

  20. Ponce, P., Peffer, T., Molina, A., Barcena, S.: Social creation networks for designing low income interfaces in programmable thermostats. Technol. Soc. 62, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohamed, N., Al-Jaroodi, J., Jawhar, I.: Service-oriented big data analytics for improving buildings energy management in smart cities. In: 2018 14th International Wireless Communications Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), pp. 1243–1248 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/IWCMC.2018.8450469

  22. Bonnemains, V., Saurel, C., Tessier, C.: Embedded ethics: some technical and ethical challenges. Ethics Inf. Technol. 20(1), 41–58 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9444-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Krisher, T.: Can Self-Driving Cars Withstand First Fatality? U.S. News & World Report. 20 March 2018https://www.usnews.com/news/business/articles/2018-03-20/arizona-death-brings-calls-for-more-autonomous-vehicle-rules. Accessed on 20 Feb 2021

  24. Akkaya, K., Guvenc, I., Aygun, R., Pala, N., Kadri, A.: IoT-based occupancy monitoring techniques for energy-efficient smart buildings. In: 2015 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW), pp. 58–63 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNCW.2015.7122529

  25. Kim, J.S.: Making smart cities work in the face of conflicts: lessons from practitioners of South Korea’s U-City projects. Town Plan. Rev. 86(5), 561–585 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bogomolov, A., Lepri, B., Staiano, J., Oliver, N., Pianesi, F., Pentland, A.: Once upon a crime: towards crime prediction from demographics and mobile data. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, pp. 427–434 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2663204.2663254

  27. Misselhorn, C.: Artificial morality. Concepts, issues and challenges. Society 55(2), 161–169 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-018-0229-y

  28. Brożek, B., Janik, B.: Can artificial intelligences be moral agents? New Ideas Psychol. 54, 101–106 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bauer, W.A.: Virtuous vs. utilitarian artificial moral agents. AI Soc. 35(1), 263–271 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0871-3

  30. Clarke, R.: Asimov’s laws of robotics: implications for information technology-part I. Computer 26(12), 53–61 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1109/2.247652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Trencher, G.: Towards the smart city 2.0: empirical evidence of using smartness as a tool for tackling social challenges. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 142, 117–128 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jiang, L., et al.: Wearable long-term social sensing for mental wellbeing. IEEE Sens. J. 19(19), 8532–8542 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2018.2877427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Umetsu, Y., Nakamura, Y., Arakawa, Y., Fujimoto, M., Suwa, H.: EHAAS: energy harvesters as a sensor for place recognition on wearables. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), pp. 1–10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM.2019.8767385

  34. Jeyakumar, J.V., Lai, L., Suda, N., Srivastava, M.: SenseHAR: a robust virtual activity sensor for smartphones and wearables. In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 15–28 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3356250.3360032

  35. Allen, C., Smit, I., Wallach, W.: Artificial morality: top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches. Ethics Inf. Technol. 7(3), 149–155 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-0004-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Coeckelbergh, M.: AI Ethics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA (2020)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Wallach, W., Allen, C., Smit, I.: Machine morality: Bottom-up and top-down approaches for modelling human moral faculties. AI Soc. 22(4), 565–582 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0099-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tolan, S., Miron, M., Gómez, E., Castillo, C.: Why machine learning may lead to unfairness: evidence from risk assessment for juvenile justice in catalonia. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 83–92 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3326705

  39. Floridi, L., Sanders, J.W.: On the morality of artificial agents. Minds Mach. 14(3), 349–379 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kok, J.N., Boers, E.J., Kosters, W.A., Van der Putten, P., Poel, M.: Artificial intelligence: definition, trends, techniques, and cases. Artif. Intell. 1, 270–299 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dignum, V.: Ethics in artificial intelligence: introduction to the special issue. Ethics Inf. Technol. 20(1), 1–3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9450-z

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Glasco, J.: Smart Education for Smart Cities: Visual, Collaborative & Interactive (2019). https://hub.beesmart.city/en/solutions/smart-people/smart-education/viewsonic-smart-education-for-smart-cities. Accessed on 28 Nov 2020

  43. The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI. Oxford University Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mata, O., Mendez, I., Aguilar, M., Ponce, P., Molina, A.: A Methodology to motivate students to develop transversal competencies in academic courses based on the theory of planned behavior by using gamification and ANNs. In: 2019 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), pp. 174–177. Goa, India (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/t4e.2019.00041

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research project is supported by Tecnologico de Monterrey and CITRIS under the collaboration ITESM-CITRIS Smart thermostat, deep learning, and gamification project (https://citris-uc.org/2019-itesm-seed-funding/), and the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1828010.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omar Mata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mata, O., Ponce, P., McDaniel, T., MĂ©ndez, J.I., Peffer, T., Molina, A. (2021). Smart City Concept Based on Cyber-Physical Social Systems with Hierarchical Ethical Agents Approach. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Access to Media, Learning and Assistive Environments. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12769. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78095-1_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78095-1_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78094-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78095-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics