Skip to main content

System Architecture and User Interface Design for a Human-Machine Interaction System for Dementia Intervention

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Supporting Everyday Life Activities (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12787))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A growing number of older adults in America face dementia and its associated behaviors. One of the most prevalent behaviors is apathy, which leads to social isolation, reduced quality of life, cognitive decline, increased mortality and caregiver burden. Current interventions are costly and require intensive personnel resources. Given the shortage of qualified care givers, technology may be an effective and complementary approach. Research has shown that multimodal interventions that include social, physical, and cognitive activities have the best outcomes. We propose a novel system combining social robotics and virtual reality to engage older adults in tasks that target all three areas. In this paper, we describe the system architecture, which includes the Virtual system Musical Task, the social robot, the state machine, and the wand that is used as an input device. Five participants tested the system. The virtual reality and robot functioned as expected with no errors. The wand had errors below 10%. The average usability score was 89.5. Overall, this study demonstrated that the system performs as expected per the functional system requirements. Further studies are necessary to explore the functionality and usability of the system with older adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alzheimer’s Association: Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures On the Front Lines : Primary Care Physicians and,” 2020. https://www.alz.org/news/2020/primary-care-physicians-on-the-front-lines-of-diag

  2. Volicer, L.: Behavioral problems and dementia. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 34(4), 637–651 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2018.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lanctôt, K.L., et al.: Apathy associated with neurocognitive disorders: recent progress and future directions. Alzheimer’s Dementia 13(1), 84–100 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brodaty, H., Burns, K.: Nonpharmacological management of apathy in dementia: a systematic review. Am. J. Geriatr. Psych. 20(7), 549–564 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e31822be242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Manca, M., et al.: The impact of serious games with humanoid robots on mild cognitive impairment older adults. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 145 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102509

  6. Cohen-Mansfield, J., Marx, M.S., Dakheel-Ali, M., Thein, K.: The use and utility of specific nonpharmacological interventions for behavioral symptoms in dementia: an exploratory study. Am. J. Geriat. Psych. 23(2), 160–170 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2014.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McCallum, S., Boletsis, C.: Dementia games: a literature review of dementia-related serious games. In: Ma, M., Oliveira, M.F., Petersen, S., Hauge, J.B. (eds.) SGDA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8101, pp. 15–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40790-1_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Krueger, K.R., Wilson, R.S., Kamenetsky, J.M., Barnes, L.L., Bienias, J.L., Bennett, D.A.: Social engagement and cognitive function in old age. Exp. Aging Res. 35(1), 45–60 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730802545028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. “Long-Term Services and Supports: Nursing Workforce Demand Projections About the National Center for Health Workforce Analysis” (2015). http://bhw.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/index.html

  10. Yu, R., et al.: Use of a therapeutic, socially assistive Pet Robot (PARO) in improving mood and stimulating social interaction and communication for people with dementia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res. Prot. 4(2), e45 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.4189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Šabanovic, S., Bennett, C.C., Chang, W.L., Huber, L.: PARO robot affects diverse interaction modalities in group sensory therapy for older adults with dementia (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2013.6650427

  12. Görer, B., Salah, A.A., Akın, H.L.: A robotic fitness coach for the elderly. In: Augusto, J.C., Wichert, R., Collier, R., Keyson, D., Salah, A.A., Tan, A.-H. (eds.) AmI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8309, pp. 124–139. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03647-2_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Fasola, J., Mataric, M.: A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 2(2), 3–32 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5898/jhri.2.2.fasola

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsusaka, Y., Fujii, H., Okano, T., Hara, I.: Health exercise demonstration robot TAIZO and effects of using voice command in robot-human collaborative demonstration. In: Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 472–477 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326042

  15. McColl, D., Louie, W.Y.G., Nejat, G.: Brian 2.1: a socially assistive robot for the elderly and cognitively impaired. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 20(1), 74–83 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2229939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eisapour, M., Cao, S., Domenicucci, L., Boger, J.: Virtual reality exergames for people living with dementia based on exercise therapy best practices. Proc. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. 1, 528–532 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mann, J.A., Macdonald, B.A., Kuo, I.H., Li, X., Broadbent, E.: People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43, 112–117 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bainbridge, W.A., Hart, J.W., Kim, E.S., Scassellati, B.: The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3(1), 41–52 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0082-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety: “Hand Tool Ergonomics - Tool Design: OSH Answers”, Canada, 2020. https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/ergonomics/handtools/tooldesign.html. Accessed 26 Oct 2020

  20. Madgwick, S.O.H.: An efficient orientation filter for inertial and inertial/magnetic sensor arrays (2010). Accessed 09 Feb 2021

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brooke, J.: SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale (1996). Accessed 26 Oct 2020

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 24(6), 574–594 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01AG062685. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. One author was also supported by the National Science Foundation Research Traineeship DGE 19–22697. The authors would like to thank the participants for their time and feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miroslava Migovich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Migovich, M., Ghosh, R., Khan, N., Tate, J.A., Mion, L.C., Sarkar, N. (2021). System Architecture and User Interface Design for a Human-Machine Interaction System for Dementia Intervention. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Supporting Everyday Life Activities. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12787. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78111-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78111-8_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78110-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78111-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics