Skip to main content

A Experimental Study of the Cognitive Load of In-vehicle Multiscreen Connected HUD

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design for Contemporary Technological Environments (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12781))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2409 Accesses

Abstract

The large variety of information that a driver must interpret while driving has caused an increasing number of screens to appear inside vehicles, making heads-up display (HUD) multiscreen interconnections more applicable inside cars. However, human cognitive resources are limited, and too much information can easily lead to distraction. Whether HUD multiscreen interconnections can effectively reduce driver distraction is still controversial. This study investigated the information and road conditions that drivers must be alerted. Based on the types of information and scenarios obtained from a study of users, a simulated driving experiment was used to measure drivers’ response times and cognitive loads when viewing driving-assistance information to complete a driving task. The study aimed to verify whether a HUD could help the driver respond more quickly and use fewer cognitive resources when driving-assistance information was shown separately from the central screen. Experimental results show that HUDs can effectively reduce a driver’s cognitive load compared having information displayed on only a central screen. Additionally, HUDs can improve a driver’s reaction time when displaying all types of driving assistance information. This study compared drivers’ reaction times and cognitive loads when using HUDs and central control screens that display the same and different types of information. We also analysed the distribution of information displayed between screens in a multiscreen car. Results show that when the type of content between the car screens is the same, there is no significant difference in the driver’s reaction time compared to the reaction time associated with the HUD alone. This study also provides ideas and suggestions for the future development of HUD-based multiscreen interconnections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tan, J., Xu, S.H.: Multi-screen interactive experience of car navigation based on Internet of Vehicles. Packag. Eng. 38(20), 17–22 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caudell, T.P., Mizell, D.W.: Augmented reality: an application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 659–669. IEEE (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhan, J.: Information architecture and visual design of vehicle HUD interface. J. Shandong Inst. Arts Des. 2, 41–46 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hibberd, D.L., Jamson, S.L., Carsten, O.M.: Managing in-vehicle distractions: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 4–11 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, M., Streeter, J., Burnett, G., Gabbard, J.L.: Visual search tasks: the effects of head-up displays on driving and task performance. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 80–87 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, J.M., Luo, W.D., Cao, B., Jia, L., Ma, X.Q.: Human-machine interface design of vehicle HUD. Autom. Instrum. 36(7), 85–87 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haeuslschmid, R., Pfleging, B., Alt, F.: A design space to support the development of windshield applications for the car. In: 2016 CHI Conference, pp. 5076–5091. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ji, X.F., Lian, C.X., Feng, C., Guo, F.X.: Research on the measurement method of driver’s cognitive load based on multi-source information. China Saf. Sci. J. 25(12), 34–39 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Norman, D.A.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Civitas Books (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beede, K.E., Kass, S.J.: Engrossed in conversation: the impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38(2), 415–421 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rakauskas, M.E., Gugerty, L.J., Ward, N.J.: Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance. J. Saf. Res. 35(4), 453–464 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Endsley, M.R.: Predictive utility of an objective measure of situation awareness. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 41–45. SAGE Publications, Sage, Los Angeles (October 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kass, S.J., Herschler, D.A., Companion, M.A.: Training situational awareness through pattern recognition in a battlefield environment. Mil. Psychol. 3(2), 105–112 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kass, S.J., Cole, K.S., Stanny, C.J.: Effects of distraction and experience on situation awareness and simulated driving. Transport. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 10(4), 321–329 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Endsley, M.R.: Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors 37(1), 65–84 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Martins, M.M., Santos, C.P., Frizera-Neto, A., Ceres, R.: Assistive mobility devices focusing on smart walkers: classification and review. Robot. Auton. Syst. 60(4), 548–562 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, D.H., Lee, H.: Effects of user experience on user resistance to change to the voice user interface of an in vehicle infotainment system: implications for platform and standards competition. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 36(4), 653–667 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cycil, C., Perry, M., Laurier, E.: Designing for frustration and disputes in the family car. Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. 6(2), 46–60 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, H.: Method of physical education informationization requirement analysis. J. Beijing Sport Univ. 4, 80–84 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar, S., Dolev, E., Pecht, M.: Parameter selection for health monitoring of electronic products. Microelectron. Reliab. 50(2), 161–168 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mozaffarian, D., et al.: Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics—2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 131(4), 434–441 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tbatou, S., Ramrami, A., Tabii, Y.: Security of communications in connected cars Modeling and safety assessment. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Big Data, Cloud and Applications, p. 56. ACM (March 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kaiwartya, O., et al.: Internet of vehicles: Motivation, layered architecture, network model, challenges, and future aspects. IEEE Access 4, 5356–5373 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun, J., Wu, Z.: An integrated simulation platform for connected vehicle system experiments. Res. Explor. Lab. 33(2), 75–78 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, He, Li: J. Hubei Univ. Econ. (Humanit. Soc. Sci.) 12(3), 81–82 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank HMI lab in Beijing Normal University, who provide the context of our simulation. Moreover, thank all the participants for their contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yancong Zhu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhu, Y., Jing, Y., Jiang, M., Zhang, Z., Wang, D., Liu, W. (2021). A Experimental Study of the Cognitive Load of In-vehicle Multiscreen Connected HUD. In: Soares, M.M., Rosenzweig, E., Marcus, A. (eds) Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design for Contemporary Technological Environments. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12781. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78227-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78227-6_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78226-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78227-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics