Skip to main content

Investigating Effects of Selecting Challenging Goals

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12749))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3866 Accesses

Abstract

Goal setting is a vital component of self-regulated learning. Numerous studies show that selecting challenging goals has strong positive effects on performance. We investigate the effect of support for goal setting in SQL-Tutor. The experimental group had support for selecting challenging goals, while the control group students could select goals freely. The experimental group achieved the same learning outcomes as the control group, but by attempting and solving significantly fewer, but more complex problems. Causal modelling revealed that the experimental group students who selected more challenging goals were superior in problem solving. We also found a significant improvement in self-reported goal setting skills of the experimental group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bernacki, M.L., Nokes-Malach, T.J., Aleven, V.: Fine-grained assessment of motivation over long periods of learning with an intelligent tutoring system: methodology, advantages, and preliminary results. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. SIHE, vol. 28, pp. 629–644. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carr (nee Harris), A., Luckin, R., Yuill, N., Avramides, K.: How mastery and performance goals influence learners’ metacognitive help-seeking behaviours when using Ecolab II. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. SIHE, vol. 28, pp. 659–668. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchinelli, A., et al.: Finding traces of self-regulated learning in activity streams. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 191–200 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D., Chen, G., Jivet, I., Hauff, C., Houben, G.-J.: Encouraging metacognition & self-regulation in MOOCs through increased learner feedback. In: Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, pp. 17–22 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M.C., Azevedo, R.: Motivation matters: interactions between achievement goals and agent scaffolding for self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring system. Comput. Hum. Behav. 52, 338–348 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, J.M., Taub, M., Azevedo, R., Bouchet, F.: Let’s set up some subgoals: understanding human-pedagogical agent collaborations and their implications for learning and prompt and feedback compliance. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 11(1), 54–66 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kizilcec, R.F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Maldonado, J.J.: Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Comput. Educ. 104, 18–33 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landers, R.N., Bauer, K.N., Callan, R.C.: Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: a goal setting experiment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 71, 508–515 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G.P., Piccolo, R.F.: The effect of context-specific versus nonspecific subconscious goals on employee performance. Hum. Resour. Manag. 51(4), 511–523 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G.P., Yukl, G.A.: Assigned versus participative goal setting with educated and uneducated woods workers. J. Appl. Psychol. 60(3), 299 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G.P., Brcic, J., Steinhauer, A.: Toward an integration of goal setting theory and the automaticity model. Appl. Psychol. 66(1), 25–48 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E.A.: Self-set goals and self-efficacy as mediators of incentives and personality. In: Erez, M., Kleinbeck, U., Thierry, H. (eds.) Work Motivation in the Context of a Globalizing Economy, pp. 13–26. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwa (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P.: A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance: Prentice-Hall, Inc., Hoboken (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P.: Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. Am. Psychol. 57(9), 705 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P.: The development of goal setting theory: a half century retrospective. Motiv. Sci. 5(2), 93 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masuda, A.D., Locke, E.A., Williams, K.J.: The effects of simultaneous learning and performance goals on performance: an inductive exploration. J. Cogn. Psychol. 27(1), 37–52 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, M.: Investigating the effectiveness of problem templates on learning in intelligent tutoring systems. Honours report, Department of Computer Science, University of Canterbury (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Melis, E., Siekmann, J.: Activemath: an intelligent tutoring system for mathematics. In: Rutkowski, L., Siekmann, J.H., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A. (eds.) ICAISC 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3070, pp. 91–101. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24844-6_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrovic, A.: An intelligent SQL tutor on the web. Artif. Intell. Educ. 13(2–4), 173–197 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P.R., De Groot, E.V.: Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. J. Educ. Psychol. 82(1), 33 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J.P., Shores, L.R., Mott, B.W., Lester, J.C.: Integrating learning, problem solving, and engagement in narrative-centered learning environments. Artif. Intell. Educ. 21(1–2), 115–133 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seijts, G.H., Latham, G.P.: Learning versus performance goals: when should each be used? Acad. Manag. Perspect. 19(1), 124–131 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B.J.: Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory Pract. 41(2), 64–70 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B.J., Schunk, D.H.: Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faiza Tahir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tahir, F., Mitrović, A., Sotardi, V. (2021). Investigating Effects of Selecting Challenging Goals. In: Roll, I., McNamara, D., Sosnovsky, S., Luckin, R., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12749. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78270-2_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78270-2_62

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78269-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78270-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics