Skip to main content

Machine Learning Models and Their Development Process as Learning Affordances for Humans

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2021)

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between unsupervised machine learning models, and the mental models of those who develop or use them. In particular, we consider unsupervised models, as well as the ‘organisational co-learning process’ that creates them, as learning affordances. The co-learning process involves inputs originating both from the human participants’ shared semantics, as well as from the data. By combining these, the process as well as the resulting computational models afford a newly shaped mental model, which is potentially more resistant to the biases of human mental models. We illustrate this organisational co-learning process with a case study involving unsupervised modelling via commonly used methods such as dimension reduction and clustering. Our case study describes how a trading and training company engaged in the co-learning process, and how its mental models of trading behavior were shaped (and afforded) by the resulting unsupervised machine learning model. The paper argues that this kind of co-learning process can play a significant role in human learning, by shaping and safeguarding participants’ mental models, precisely because the models are unsupervised, and thus potentially lead to learning from unexpected or inexplicit patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Futures are derivative financial contracts that obligate the parties to transact an asset at a predetermined future date and price.

References

  1. Seel, N.M.: Model-based learning: a synthesis of theory and research. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 65(4), 931–966 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9507-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. du Boulay, B., O’Shea, T., Monk, J.: The black box inside the glass box: presenting computing concepts to novices. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 14(3), 237–249 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marsick, V.J., Watkins, K.E.: Demonstrating the value of an organisation’s learning culture: the dimensions of the learning organisation questionnaire. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 5(2), 132–151 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Echeverria, V., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Buckingham Shum, S.: Towards collaboration translucence: giving meaning to multimodal group data. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–16 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kent, C., et al.: On how unsupervised learning can shape minds: a very brief overview. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ambrose, S., Bridges, M., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M., Norman, M.: How Learning Works: 7 Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mayer, R.E.: The Promise of Educational Psychology. Teaching for Meaningful Learning, vol. 2. Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4930420410

  8. Watkins, K.E., Kim, K.: Current status and promising directions for research on the learning organisation. Hum. Resour. Dev. Q. 29(1), 15–29 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge Creating Company. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Siemens, G.: Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. Int. J. Instr. Technol. Distance Learn. (IRRODL) 2(1), 3–10 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smart, P.R., Engelbrecht, P.C., Braines, D., Hendler, J.A., Shadbolt, N.R.: The Extended Mind and Network-Enabled Cognition. School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fjørtoft, H., Lai, M.K.: Affordances of narrative and numerical data: a social-semiotic approach to data use. Stud. Educ. Eval. 100846 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Classic Psychology Press, New York (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Amershi, S., Conati, C.: Combining unsupervised and supervised classification to build user models for exploratory learning environments. JEDM J. Educ. Data Min. 1(1), 18–71 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, N., Biswas, G., Dong, Y.: Characterizing students’ learning behaviors using unsupervised learning methods. In: André, Elisabeth, Baker, Ryan, Hu, Xiangen, Rodrigo, Ma Mercedes T., du Boulay, Benedict (eds.) AIED 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10331, pp. 430–441. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness, No. 6. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holyoak, K.J., Morrison, R.G. (eds.): The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, vol. 137. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barlow, H.B.: Unsupervised learning. Neural Comput. 1(3), 295–311 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R.: How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Expanded Edition). The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sawyer, R.K. (ed.): The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marsick, V.J., Watkins, K.E.: Facilitating Learning Organisations. Gower, Brookfield (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Edwards-Leis, C.E.: Challenging learning journeys in the classroom: using mental model theory to inform how pupils think when they are generating solutions (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barker, P., van Schaik, P., Hudson, S., Meng Tan, C.: Mental models and their role in the teaching and learning of human-computer interaction. In: Ottman, T., Tomek, I. (eds.) Proceedings of ED-MEDIA/ED-TELECOM 1998, 10th World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, vol. 1. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Carroll, J.M., Olson, J.R.: Mental models in human-computer interaction. In: Helander, M. (ed.) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 45–65. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Ausubel, D.P.: Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bucciarelli, M.: How the construction of mental models improves learning. Mind Soc. 6(1), 67–89 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson, R.C.: The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise: general discussion of the conference. In: Anderson, R.C., Spiro, R.J., Montague, W.E. (eds.) Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1977/1984)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., Carey, T.: Human Computer Interaction. Addison Wesley, Boston (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Barker, P.G.: Mental models and network pedagogy. In: Conference Proceedings of EN-ABLE 1999, International Conference EVITech. Helskinki University, Finland (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  30. McClelland, T.: The mental affordance hypothesis. Mind 129(514), 401–427 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Henderson, L., Tallman, J.: Stimulated recall and mental models. Scarecrow Press, Inc., Lanham (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vosniadou, S., Brewer, W.F.: Mental models of the earth: a study of conceptual change in childhood. Cogn. Psychol. 24(4), 535–585 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Franco, C., Colinvaux, D.: Grasping mental models. In: Gilbert, J.K., Boulter, C.J. (eds.) Developing models in science education, pp. 93–118. Springer, Dordrecht (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0876-1_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Vaughan, J.W., Wallach, H.: A human-centered agenda for intelligible machine learning. In: Machines We Trust: Getting Along with Artificial Intelligence (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nelson, L.K.: Computational grounded theory: a methodological framework. Sociol. Methods Res. 49, 3–42 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729703

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Penuel, W.R., Shepard, L.A.: Assessment and teaching. In: Gitomer, D.H., Bell, C.A. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Teaching, 5th edn, pp. 787–850. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Radford, J., Joseph, K.: Theory in, theory out: the uses of social theory in machine learning for social science. arXiv:2001.03203 (2020)

  38. Hamilton, L., Halverson, R., Jackson, S., Mandinach, E., Supovitz, J., Wayman, J.: Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making (NCEE 2009-4067). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC (2009). http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/

  39. Mandinach, E.B., Schildkamp, K.: Misconceptions about data-based decision making in education: an exploration of the literature. Stud. Educ. Eval. 100842 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rapp, D.N.: Mental models: theoretical issues for visualisations in science education. In: Gilbert, J.K. (ed.) Visualisation in Science Education, pp. 43–60. Springer, Dordrecht. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Han, J., Pei, J., Kamber, M.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: Technical Details of the Cluster Analysis

Appendix A: Technical Details of the Cluster Analysis

Can be found at https://tinyurl.com/336dje9n.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kent, C. et al. (2021). Machine Learning Models and Their Development Process as Learning Affordances for Humans. In: Roll, I., McNamara, D., Sosnovsky, S., Luckin, R., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12748. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78291-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78292-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics