Abstract
This paper discusses findings in a user study evaluation of a novel digital brainstorming tool situated in a cognitive immersive environment. We compare how the brainstorming tools enable sensemaking by examining thematic units produced by users. The digital tool integrates multimodal inputs that are novel for brainstorming applications, and allows for multiuser collaboration. This user study examines how differences between the analog and digital brainstorming tool formats impacts sensemaking metrics. We find that the digital brainstorming tool allows users to reflect content from a source material more accurately than the analog brainstorming tool. Future work needs to identify the reason for increased idea cohesion within the cognitive immersive room’s digital brainstorming tool.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Divekar, Rahul R., et al.: CIRA: an architecture for building configurable immersive smart-rooms. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds.) IntelliSys 2018. AISC, vol. 869, pp. 76–95. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01057-7_7
Riva, G., Davide, F., Ijsselsteijn, W.A., Grigorovici, D. (eds.) Persuasive effects of presence in immersive virtual environments (2003)
Pirolli, P., Card, S.: Sensemaking processes of intelligence analysts and possible leverage points as identified through cognitive task analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, McLean, Virginia (2005)
Ericsson, K.A., Nandagopal, K., Roring, R.W.: Toward a science of exceptional achievement: attaining superior performance through deliberate practice. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1172, 199–217 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1393.001
Chase, W.G., Simon, H.A.: The mind’s eye in chess. In: Visual Information Processing, pp. 215–281. Elsevier (1973)
Beebe, S.M., Pherson, R.H.: Cases in Intelligence Analysis: Structured Analytic Techniques in Action. CQ Press (2014)
Rietzschel, E.F., Nijstad, B.A., Stroebe, W.: Productivity is not enough: a comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 42, 244–251 (2006)
Briggs, R.O., Kolfschoten, G., Vreede, G.-J. de, Albrecht, C., Dean, D.R., Lukosch, S.: A seven-layer model of collaboration: Separation of concerns for designers of collaboration systems. In: ICIS 2009 Proceedings, p. 26, Phoenix (2009)
Reinig, B.A., Briggs, R.O., Nunamaker, J.F.: On the measurement of ideation quality. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 23, 143–161 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230407
Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S.R.: A descriptive evaluation of group support systems case and field studies. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 17, 115–159 (2001)
Pinsonneault, A., Barki, H., Gallupe, R.B., Hoppen, N.: Electronic brainstorming: The illusion of productivity. Inf. Syst. Res. 10, 110–133 (1999)
White, M.D., Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis: a flexible methodology. Libr. Trends. 55, 22–45 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Briggs, S., Peveler, M., Drozdal, J., Su, H., Braasch, J. (2021). Thematic Units Comparisons Between Analog and Digital Brainstorming. In: Yamamoto, S., Mori, H. (eds) Human Interface and the Management of Information. Information Presentation and Visualization. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12765. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78321-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78321-1_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78320-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78321-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)