Skip to main content

Understanding Take-Over in Automated Driving: A Human Error Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12791))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Automation offers a new way of driving, but often the human error (HE) in the process of take-over results in adverse effects of unrecognized risks. Hence, the impact of HE in safety of automated driving remains a major problem. This paper proposed a Human error analysis method based on analysis of the root cause of HEs events to understand the process of take-over and identify root cause of take-over failure in automated driving. Simulated driving practice with videos and questionnaire were conducted to identify the main factors leading to HEs in take-over. Human factors events diagram was used to better understand take-over as a human factor event and to provide information for root cause of take-over failure recognition. The results reveal that the most common failure mode in take-over is cognition error caused by driver poor mental state such as driver fatigue and reaction ability, followed by control error caused by inappropriate take-over request (TOR). Determination of these failure modes provide evidence for increasing or repairing barriers in the process of take-over. The suggested cognition-corresponding model of take-over showed that take-over is a complex human-machine interaction process, thus the causes of HEs should be discussed from a multi-dimensional perspective, and explored through empirical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stanton, N.A., Marsden, P.: From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: safety implications of automation in vehicles. Saf. Sci. 24(1), 35–49 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Standard, SAE International. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. J3016 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, B., De Winter, J., Varotto, S., Happee, R., Martens, M.: Determinants of take-over time from automated driving: a meta-analysis of 129 studies. Transp. Res. 64F, 285–307 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gold, C., Happee, R., Bengler, K.: Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 116. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mccall, R., Mcgee, F., Meschtcherjakov, A., Louveton, N., Engel, T.: Towards a taxonomy of autonomous vehicle handover situations. In: Automotive'UI 16. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Winter, J.C.F.D., Happee, R., Martens, M.H., Stanton, N.A.: Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: a review of the empirical evidence. Transp. Res. Part F: Psychol. Behav. 27, 196–217 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Onnasch, L., Wickens, C.D., Li, H., et al.: Human performance consequences of stages and levels of automation an integrated meta-analysis. Hum. Factors 56(3), 476 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Flemisch, F., Kelsch, J., Lo¨per, C., Schieben, A., Schindler, J., Heesen, M.: Cooperative control and active interfaces for vehicle assistance and automation. In: Proceedings of FISITA Automotive World Congress, Munich, F2008-02-045, VDI-FVT (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Choi, D., Sato, T., Ando, T., Abe, T., Kitazaki, S.: Effects of cognitive and visual loads on driving performance after take-over request (tor) in automated driving. Appl. Ergon. 85, 103074 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F.C.H., Daly, M., Carsten, O.M.J.: Transition to manual: driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle - sciencedirect. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27(26), 274–282 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Norman, D.A.: Design rules based on analyses of human error. Commun. ACM 26(4), 254–258 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mussulman, L., White, D.: The human factors analysis and classification system (hfacs). Approach the Naval Safety Centers Aviation Magazine (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mosleh, A., Groth, K.: A performance shaping factors causal model for nuclear power plant human reliability analysis. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM-10) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, J.N.: The development of K-HPES: a Korean-version human performance enhancement system [for nuclear power plant control]. In: IEEE Sixth Conference on Human Factors & Power Plants, Global Perspectives of Human Factors in Power Generation. IEEE (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M.: Human error taxonomies applied to driving: a generic driver error taxonomy and its implications for intelligent transport systems. Saf. Sci. 47(2), 227–237 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Swain, A.D.: Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. NUREG/CR-1278 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  17. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3DbrYx-SN4. Accessed 07 Oct 2020

  18. https://v.qq.com/x/page/k3047km0b4r.html. Accessed 21 Dec 2020

  19. Johnson, V., White, H.R.: An investigation of factors related to intoxicated driving behaviors among youth. J. Stud. Alcohol 50(4), 320–330 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Atchley, P., Chan, M.: Potential benefits and costs of concurrent task engagement to maintain vigilance: a driving simulator investigation. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 53(1), 3–12 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Crawford, A.: Fatigue and driving. Ergonomics 4(2), 143–154 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaber, D.B., Perry, C.M., Segall, N., Mcclernon, C.K., Iii, L.J.P.: Situation awareness implications of adaptive automation for information processing in an air traffic control-related task. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 36(5), 447–462 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Inagaki, T.: Design of human–machine interactions in light of domain-dependence of human-centered automation. Cogn. Technol. Work 8(3), 161–167 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu, Y., Kihara, K., Hasegawa, K., Takeda, Y., Kitazaki, S.: Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving. J. Saf. Res. 72, 231–238 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, J., Liu, L., Gu, L. (2021). Understanding Take-Over in Automated Driving: A Human Error Analysis. In: Krömker, H. (eds) HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12791. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78358-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78358-7_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78357-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78358-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics