Skip to main content

Guidelines for Collecting Automatic Facial Expression Detection Data Synchronized with a Dynamic Stimulus in Remote Moderated User Tests

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Methods and Tools (HCII 2021)

Abstract

Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, telework policies have required many user experience (UX) labs to restrict their research activities to remote user testing. Automatic Facial Expression Analysis (AFEA) is an accessible psychophysiological measurement that can be easily implemented in remote user tests. However, to date, the literature on Human Computer Interaction (HCI) has provided no guidelines for remote moderated user tests that collect facial expression data and synchronize them with the state of a dynamic stimulus such as a webpage. To address this research gap, this article offers guidelines for effective AFEA data collection that are based on a methodology developed in a concrete research context and on the lessons learned from applying it in four remote moderated user testing projects. Since researchers have less control over test environment settings, we maintain that they should pay greater attention to factors that can affect face detection and\or emotion classification prior, during, and after remote moderated user tests. Our study contributes to the development of methods for including psychophysiological and neurophysiological measurements in remote user tests that offer promising opportunities for information systems (IS) research, UX design, and even digital health research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Evalyzer, HatchTank, iTracks, Lookback.io, Qualaroo, Recollective, Trymyui, Userlook, Userlytics, Usertesting, UXCam, Validately.

References

  1. vom Brocke, J., Hevner, A., Léger, P.M., Walla, P., Riedl, R.: Advancing a NeuroIS research agenda with four areas of societal contributions. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 29(1), 9–24 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarez, J., Brieugne, D., Léger, P.M., Sénécal, S., Frédette, M.: Towards agility and speed in enriched UX evaluation projects. In: Human 4.0-From Biology to Cybernetic, IntechOpen (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alvarez, J., Léger, P.M., Fredette, M., Chen, S.L., Maunier, B., Senecal, S.: An enriched customer journey map: how to construct and visualize a global portrait of both lived and perceived users’ experiences? Designs 4(3), 29 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Black, J., Abrams, M.: Remote usability testing. In: The Wiley Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, pp. 277–297 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bolt, N., Tulathimutte, T.: Remote Research: Real Users, Real Time, Real Research, 1st edn. Rosenfeld Media, LLC, Brooklyn (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Remote Moderated Usability Tests: How to Do Them. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/moderated-remote-usability-test/. Accessed 06 Feb 2020

  7. Skiendziel, T., Ro, A.G.: Assessing the convergent validity between the automated emotion recognition software Noldus FaceReader 7 and facial action coding system scoring. PLoS One 1–18 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V.: Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Noldus FaceReader methodology. https://info.noldus.com/free-white-paper-on-facereader-methodology. Accessed 15 Jan 2020

  10. Cohen, B.H., Davidson, R.J., Senulis, J.A., Saron, C.D., Weisman, D.R.: Muscle tension patterns during auditory attention. Biol. Psychol. 33, 133–156 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peper, E, Gibney, K.H.: muscle biofeedback at the computer: a manual to prevent repetitive strain injury (RSI) by taking the guesswork out of assessment, monitoring, and training. Association for Applied Psychophysiology & Biofeedback (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Léger, P.-M., Courtemanche, F., Fredette, M., Sénécal, S.: A cloud-based lab management and analytics software for triangulated human-centered research. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A.B. (eds.) Information Systems and Neuroscience. LNISO, vol. 29, pp. 93–99. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01087-4_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Courtemanche, F., et al.: Ambient facial emotion recognition: a pilot study. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A.B., Fischer, T. (eds.) NeuroIS 2020. LNISO, vol. 43, pp. 284–290. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60073-0_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Courtemanche, F., Léger, P.-M., Dufresne, A., Fredette, M., Labonté-LeMoyne, É., Sénécal, S.: Physiological heatmaps: a tool for visualizing users’ emotional reactions. Multimed. Tools Appl. 77(9), 11547–11574 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5091-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Courtemanche, F., et al.: U.S. Patent No. 10,368,741. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Giroux-Huppé, C., Sénécal, S., Fredette, M., Chen, S.L., Demolin, B., Léger, P.-M.: Identifying psychophysiological pain points in the online user journey: the case of online grocery. In: Marcus, A., Wang, W. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11586, pp. 459–473. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23535-2_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Lamontagne, C., et al.: User test: how many users are needed to find the psychophysiological pain points in a journey map? In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R., Colson, S., Choplin, A. (eds.) Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies. IHIET 2019, vol. 1018, pp. 136–142. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25629-6_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Larson, K., Hazlett, R.L., Chaparro, B.S., Picard, R.W.: Measuring the aesthetics of reading. In: Bryan-Kinns, N., Blanford, A., Curzon, P., Nigay, L. (eds.) People and Computers XX—Engage, pp 41–56. Springer, London (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-664-3_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Kappas, A.: What facial activity can and cannot tell us about emotions. In: Katsikitis, M. (ed.) The human face: Measurement and Meaning, pp. 215–234. Springer, Boston (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1063-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Roy, A., Sénécal, S., Léger, P.-M., Demolin, B., Bigras, É., Gagne, J.: Measuring users’ psychophysiological experience in non-linear omnichannel environment. In: Stephanidis, C., Marcus, A., Rosenzweig, E., Rau, P.-L., Moallem, A., Rauterberg, M. (eds.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12423, pp. 762–779. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60114-0_50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Veilleux, M., et al.: Visualizing a user’s cognitive and emotional journeys: a fintech case. In: Marcus, A., Rosenzweig, E. (eds.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12200, pp. 549–566. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49713-2_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Giroux, F., et al.: Haptic stimulation with high fidelity vibro-kinetic technology psychophysiologically enhances seated active music listening experience. In: 2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference, pp. 151–156 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Giroux, F., Boasen, J., Sénécal, S., Léger, P.-M.: Hedonic multitasking: the effects of instrumental subtitles during video watching. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A.B., Fischer, T. (eds.) NeuroIS 2020. LNISO, vol. 43, pp. 330–336. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60073-0_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Falconnet, A., et al.: Beyond system design: the impact of message design on recommendation acceptance. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A.B., Fischer, T. (eds.) NeuroIS 2020. LNISO, vol. 43, pp. 185–190. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60073-0_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Beauchesne, A., et al.: User-centered gestures for mobile phones: exploring a method to evaluate user gestures for UX designers. In: Marcus, A., Wang, W. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11584, pp. 121–133. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23541-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Brissette-Gendron, R., Léger, P.M., Courtemanche, F., Chen, S.L., Ouhnana, M., Sénécal, S.: The response to impactful interactivity on spectators’ engagement in a digital game. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 4(4), 89 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Le Pailleur, F., Huang, B., Léger, P.-M., Sénécal, S.: A new approach to measure user experience with voice-controlled intelligent assistants: a pilot study. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12182, pp. 197–208. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49062-1_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Passalacqua, M., et al.: Playing in the backstore: interface gamification increases warehousing workforce engagement. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ruer, P., et al.: Improving driving behavior with an insurance telematics mobile application. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A.B., Fischer, T. (eds.) NeuroIS 2020. LNISO, vol. 43, pp. 198–203. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60073-0_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Vasseur, A., et al.: Distributed remote psychophysiological data collection for UX evaluation: a pilot project. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Demazure, T., et al.: Distributed remote EEG data collection for NeuroIS research: a methodological framework. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Riedl, R., Davis, F.D., Leger, P.M., Muller-Putz, G.: NeuroIS: status, rewarding research questions, and future directions. practice development workshop. In: Forty-First International Conference on Information Systems, India (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Félix Giroux .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Giroux, F. et al. (2021). Guidelines for Collecting Automatic Facial Expression Detection Data Synchronized with a Dynamic Stimulus in Remote Moderated User Tests. In: Kurosu, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Methods and Tools. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12762. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78462-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78462-1_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78461-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78462-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics