Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Implementation of Lean Product Development in a University Course and an Industry Project: Lessons Learned from a Comparative Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Methods and Tools (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12762))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 4708 Accesses

Abstract

The global competition in products and business is becoming intense. Most companies hope to stay ahead of their competitors during global expansion. To stay competitive in the marketplace, Lean Product Development (LPD) has drawn huge attention both from the industry and the academia because (1) enterprises are facing challenges in product development, e.g., long lead time in development, failure in innovation, and poor management in design activities, etc.; (2) most innovations in universities are often impractical and lack economic value. The purpose of the study was to uncover and to compare the processes and the design outcomes of the implementation of LPD among university student groups and among enterprise research and development (R&D) teams. In this study, product development teams were formed among industrial design juniors, as well as among the staff at the R&D department of a hair clipper company. All participants were asked to develop either a hair dryer or an electric hair clipper following the LAMDA (Look, Ask, Model, Discuss, and Act) cycle in LPD under the guidance of the same instructor. The LPD activities and the design outcomes were observed and analyzed by two researchers. Results showed that the student teams generally (1) were more able to think out of box without the constraints of department silos, (2) had more passion towards product and users, (3) had fewer problems in cross-functional collaborations, etc. On the other hand, the R&D teams were generally (self-) restricted psychologically and physically by the organizational culture and structure, and low work motivations, etc., thus resulting in the insufficient innovation momentum. Results of this study provide insight regarding the implementation of LPD especially in industry settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allocca, M.A., Kessler, E.H.: Innovation speed in small and medium-sized enterprises. Creativity Innov. Manag. 15(3), 279–295 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T.M., et al.: Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad. Manag. J. 39(5), 1154–1184 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., Schön, D.A.: Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice, Addison-Wesley Reading (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M.: How to develop an organization capable of sustained high performance: Embrace the drive for results-capability development paradox. Organ. Dyn. 29(4), 233 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board. University-industry research relationships: Selected studies, National Science Foundation (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C., Yang, M.: Creative process engagement and new product performance: the role of new product development speed and leadership encouragement of creativity. J. Bus. Res. 99, 215–225 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.G.: Perspective: the innovation dilemma: How to innovate when the market is mature. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 28(s1), 2–27 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.G., Edgett, S.J.: Maximizing productivity in product innovation. Res. Technol. Manag. 51(2), 47–58 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.G., et al.: Benchmarking best NPD practices—I. Res. Technol. Manag. 47(1), 31–43 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, T., et al.: New product development and testing strategies for clothing longevity (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Evanschitzky, H., et al.: Success factors of product innovation: an updated meta-analysis. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 29, 21–37 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farid, H., et al.: Biotechnology firms-improvement in innovation speed. Int. J. Bus. Innov. Res 13(2), 167–180 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feltrin, C.K., et al.: A Lean Product Development (LPD) approach on education and knowledge management in aircraft design. In: 16th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L., et al.: Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Adm. Sci. Q. 52(3), 443–475 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goktan, A.B., Miles, G.: Innovation speed and radicalness: are they inversely related? Manag. Decis. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Graebsch, M.: Information and communication in lean product development (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M.: The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Calif. Manag. Rev. 33(3), 114–135 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D.T.: The protean career: a quarter-century journey. J. Vocat. Behav. 65(1), 1–13 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, B., James-Moore, M.: Applying lean thinking to new product introduction. J. Eng. Des. 15(1), 1–31 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, P., Francis, M., Found, P.: Towards lean product lifecycle management: a framework for new product development. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 17(7), 866–887 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380610688214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katila, R., Ahuja, G.: Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Manag. J. 45(6), 1183–1194 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, F.A., Widener, S.K.: A control framework: Insights from evidence on lean accounting. Manag. Account. Res. 19(4), 301–323 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, E.H., Bierly, P.E.: Is faster really better? An empirical test of the implications of innovation speed. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 49(1), 2–12 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinsmann, M.S.: Understanding collaborative design (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krafcik, J.F.: Triumph of the lean production system. Sloan Manag. Rev. 30(1), 41–52 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensson, P., et al.: Harnessing the creative potential among users. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 21(1), 4–14 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyläheiko, K., et al.: Innovation and internationalization as growth strategies: the role of technological capabilities and appropriability. Int. Bus. Rev. 20(5), 508–520 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, J., et al.: Industrialized construction in the Swedish infrastructure sector: core elements and barriers. Constr. Manag. Econ. 32(1–2), 83–96 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • León, H.C.M., Farris, J.A.: Lean product development research: current state and future directions. Eng. Manag. J. 23(1), 29–51 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J.K.: Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer. McGraw-Hill Education (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J.K., Morgan, J.M.: The Toyota way in services: the case of lean product development. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 20(2), 5–20 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, C., Im, S.: Spurring cross-functional integration for higher new product performance: a group effectiveness perspective. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 27(4), 554–571 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, B.W.: Lean product development flow. Syst. Eng. 7(4) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Riezebos, J., et al.: Lean production and information technology: connection or contradiction? Comput. Ind. 60(4), 237–247 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M.A., Richards, R.: Eminent Creativity, Everyday Creativity, and Health. Greenwood Publishing Group (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarooghi, H., et al.: Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: a meta-analysis of organizational, cultural, and environmental factors. J. Bus. Ventur. 30(5), 714–731 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, J., Jana, R.: The state of innovation. BusinessWeek, 19 December 2007. http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/dec2007/id20071219_302022.htm. Accessed 29 Apr 2011

  • Smith, S.M.: Fixation, incubation, and insight in memory and creative thinking. Creative Cogn. Approach 135, 156 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J., Lubart, T.I.: The concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms. Handb. Creativity 1, 3–15 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, G., Scherpereel, C.: Decision making in product development: are you outside‐in or inside‐out? Manag. Decis. 46(9), 1299–1312 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810911957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas-Hunt, M.C., et al.: Who’s really sharing? Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Manag. Sci. 49(4), 464–477 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tortorella, G.L., Marodin, G.A., Miorando, R., Seidel, A.: The impact of contextual variables on learning organization in firms that are implementing lean: a study in Southern Brazil. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 78(9–12), 1879–1892 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6791-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B., Spiro, J.: Collaboration and creativity: the small world problem. Am. J. Sociol. 111(2), 447–504 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valle, S., Avella, L.: Cross‐functionality and leadership of the new product development teams. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 6(1), 32–47 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060310456319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H.: Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford University Press on Demand (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C.-H., et al.: Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty. Technovation 28(6), 349–363 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, A., et al.: The second Toyota paradox: how delaying decisions can make better cars faster. Sloan Manag. Rev. 36, 43 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Willumsen, P., et al.: Applying lean thinking to risk management in product development. In: DS 87-2 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17): Design Processes, Design Organisation and Management, Vancouver, Canada, 21–25 August 2017, vol. 2 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J.P., et al.: The machine that changed the world, Rawson Associates. New York 323, 273–287 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, M.S., et al.: Managing the future: CEO attention and innovation outcomes. J. Mark. 71(4), 84–101 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Design, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Yu-Hsiu Hung & Chia-Hui Fang

Authors
  1. Yu-Hsiu Hung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chia-Hui Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The Open University of Japan, Chiba, Japan

    Masaaki Kurosu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hung, YH., Fang, CH. (2021). Implementation of Lean Product Development in a University Course and an Industry Project: Lessons Learned from a Comparative Study. In: Kurosu, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Methods and Tools. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12762. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78462-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78462-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78461-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78462-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics