Abstract
The user experience of mobile phone products has been widely concerned, while the fluency of mobile phone will also affect the user experience. However, the factors that affect the fluency of mobile phone have not been fully discussed. Present study used semi-structured focus group interviews with 25 participants to explore the definition of smartphone fluency and the influencing factors of smartphone fluency. The interview results showed that among the 13 factors which affect mobile phone purchase, fluency is the most important factor. Fluency refers to the degree of ease with which an individual is able to perform some tasks. It usually means a high level of experience or practice. By coding and analyzing the user’s evaluation, this study summarized six factors that affect smartphone fluency experience, including connection (visual sense when frames or tasks switch), response delay (the time interval between a user completing an operation and the smart phone providing a recognizable response), nonoperational system failure (the misoperation during mobile phone operation which are not related to lack of knowledge), visual experience (sharpness, distinguishability, color matching), operation error rate (error rate when users operate a mobile phone), simplicity (the minimum number of operation steps required to complete a task). This study defines the fluency of mobile phones and identifies the dimensions of smart phone fluency, which can provide research basis for improving fluency experience, and provide new research ideas for future direction of user experience improvement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmad, N., Boota, M.W., Masoom, A.H.: Smart phone application evaluation with usability testing approach. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 7, 1045–1054 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2014.712092
Constantine, L.: Collaborative usability inspections for software. In: Proceedings of the Software Development’94 (1994)
Cuddihy, E., Spyridakis, J.H.: The effect of visual design and placement of intra-article navigation schemes on reading comprehension and website user perceptions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(4), 1399–1409 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.002
Gaudette, B., Wu, C.-J., Vrudhula, S., IEEE: Improving smartphone user experience by balancing performance and energy with probabilistic QoS guarantee. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture, pp. 52–63 (2016)
Hoxmeier, J.A., DiCesare, C.: System response time and user satisfaction: an experimental study of browser-based applications. In: AMCIS 2000 Proceedings, p. 347 (2000)
Ji, Y.G., Park, J.H., Yun, M.H.: A usability checklist for the usability evaluation of mobile phone user interface. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 20(3), 207–231 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc2003_3
Kim, K.-J., et al.: Evaluation of smartphone user experience: identification of key evaluation items and their relationships. Int. J. Mob. Commun. 16(2), 167–189 (2018)
Koutsabasis, P., Istikopoulou, T.G.: Perceived website aesthetics by users and designers: implications for evaluation practice. Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact. 9(1), 116–121 (2013)
Li., J.W.: Evaluation System Research and Implementation of the Smart Phone User Experience. Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing (2015). (Chinese)
Lindgaard, G.: Aesthetics, visual appeal, usability and user satisfaction: what do the user’s eyes tell the user’s brain? Aust. J. Emerg. Technol. Soc. 5(1), 1–14 (2007)
Luck, J.P., Mcdermott, P.L., Allender, L., Russell, D.C.: An investigation of real world control of robotic assets under communication latency. In: Paper presented at the ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-robot Interaction (2006)
Ma, Z., Qiao, Y., Lee, B., Fallon, E.: Experimental evaluation of mobile phone sensors. In: ISSC 2013: 24th IET Irish Signals and Systems Conference, 20–21 June 2013. https://doi.org/10.1049/ic.2013.0047
Mylonas, A., Dritsas, S., Tsoumas, B., Gritzalis, D., IEEE: Smartphone Security Evaluation: The Malware Attack Case (2011)
Nielsen, J.: Heuristic evaluation. usability inspection. Methods 13(3), 377–386 (1994)
Owen-Hill, A., Suárez-Ruiz, F., Ferre, M., Aracil, R.: Effect of video quality and buffering delay on telemanipulation performance (2014)
Park, B.W., Lee, K.C.: A pilot study to analyze the effects of user experience and device characteristics on the customer satisfaction of smartphone users. In: Kim, T., Adeli, H., Robles, R.J., Balitanas, M. (eds.) Ubiquitous Computing and Multimedia Applications. UCMA 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 151, pp. 421. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20998-7_50
Rasche, P.: Haptic-loading interface design for better smartphone user experience (2013)
Ren, H.B., Zhou, J., Feng, W.Q.: Evaluation of the smart phone user experience based on MTS. Packaging Engineering (Chinese) (2017)
Sauer, J., Sonderegger, A.: The influence of prototype fidelity and aesthetics of design in usability tests: effects on user behaviour, subjective evaluation and emotion. Appl. Ergon. 40(4), 670–677 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.06.006
Si., Y.Q., Liu., L.: Study on the influencing factors of the intelligent mobile phone user experience. Software (Chinese) 36(3), 111–115 (2015)
Sonderegger, A., Sauer, J.: The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability. Appl. Ergon. 41(3), 403–410 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.09.002
Sutika, T., Funilkul, S., Triyason, T., Supattatham, M., Assoc Comp, M.: Quality of Smartphone User Experience Analysis: Focusing on Smartphone Screen Brightness Level for the Elderly (2018)
Szameitat, A.J., Rummel, J., Szameltat, D.P., Sterr, A.: Behavioral and emotional consequences of brief delays in human-computer interaction. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 67(7), 561–570 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.02.004
Wu, C.C., Wick, F.A., Pomplun, M.: Guidance of visual attention by semantic information in real-world scenes. Front. Psychol. 5 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00054
Yáñez Gómez, R., Cascado Caballero, D., Sevillano, J.-L.: Heuristic evaluation on mobile interfaces: a new checklist. Sci. World J. (2014)
Yang, E., Dorneich, M.C.: The effect of time delay on emotion, arousal, and satisfaction in human-robot interaction. In: Paper Presented at the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society Meeting (2015)
Zhao, W.G., Ge, Y., Qu, W.N., Zhang, K., Sun, X.H.: The duration perception of loading applications in smartphone: effects of different loading types. Appl. Ergon. 65, 223–232 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.06.015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Liu, X., Ge, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, Q., Qu, W. (2021). The Dimension of Mobile Phone Fluency: A Focus Group Interview. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2021 - Posters. HCII 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1419. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78635-9_59
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78635-9_59
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78634-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78635-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)