Skip to main content

Modelling Turning Intention in Unsignalized Intersections with Bayesian Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2021 - Posters (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1421))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2541 Accesses

Abstract

Turning through oncoming traffic at unsignalized intersections can lead to safety-critical situations contributing to 7.4% of all non-severe vehicle crashes. One of the main reasons for these crashes are human errors in the form of incorrect estimation of the gap size with respect to the Principle Other Vehicle (POV). Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) technology promises to increase safety in various traffic situations. V2V infrastructure combined with further integration of sensor technology and human intention prediction could help reduce the frequency of these safety-critical situations by predicting dangerous turning manoeuvres in advance, thus, allowing the POV to prepare an appropriate reaction.

We performed a driving simulator study to investigate turning decisions at unsignalized intersections. Over the course of the experiments, we recorded over 5000 turning decisions with respect to different gap sizes. Afterwards, the participants filled out a questionnaire featuring demographic and driving style related items. The behavioural and questionnaire data was then used to fit a Bayesian Network model to predict the turning intention of the subject vehicle. We evaluate the model and present the results of a feature importance analysis. The model is able to correctly predict the turning intention with an accuracy of 74%. Furthermore, the feature importance analysis indicates that user specific information is a valuable contribution to the model. We discuss how a working turning intension prediction could reduce the number of safety-critical situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hamed, M.M., Easa, S.M., Batayneh, R.R.: Disaggregate gap-acceptance model for unsignalized T-intersections. J. Transp. Eng. 123(1), 36–42 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harding, J., et al.: Vehicle-to-vehicle communications: readiness of V2V technology for application (No. DOT HS 812 014). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, United States (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Plavšić, M., Klinker, G., Bubb, H.: Situation awareness assessment in critical driving situations at intersections by task and human error analysis. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 20(3), 177–191 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yan, X., Radwan, E., Guo, D.: Effects of major-road vehicle speed and driver age and gender on left-turn gap acceptance. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39(4), 843–852 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, Y., Ozguner, U.: Human driver model and driver decision making for intersection driving. In: 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 642–647. IEEE, June 2007

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Beaucorps, P., Streubel, T., Verroust-Blondet, A., Nashashibi, F., Bradai, B., Resende, P.: Decision-making for automated vehicles at intersections adapting human-like behavior. In 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 212–217. IEEE, June 2017

    Google Scholar 

  7. Damm, W., Fränzle, M., Lüdtke, A., Rieger, J.W., Trende, A., Unni, A.: Integrating neurophysiological sensors and driver models for safe and performant automated vehicle control in mixed traffic. In: 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 82–89. IEEE. June 2019

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trende, A., Unni, A., Weber, L., Rieger, J.W., Luedtke, A.: An investigation into human-autonomous vs. human-human vehicle interaction in time-critical situations. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, pp. 303–304, June 2019

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ihme, K., Unni, A., Zhang, M., Rieger, J.W., Jipp, M.: Recognizing frustration of drivers from face video recordings and brain activation measurements with functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12, 327 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ragland, D.R., Arroyo, S., Shladover, S.E., Misener, J.A., Chan, C.Y.: Gap acceptance for vehicles turning left across on-coming traffic: implications for intersection decision support design (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taubman-Ben-Ari, O., Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O.: The multidimensional driving style inventory—scale construct and validation. Accid. Anal. Prev. 36(3), 323–332 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lundberg, S., Lee, S.I.: A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07874 (2017)

  13. McKenna, F.P., Stanier, R.A., Lewis, C.: Factors underlying illusory self-assessment of driving skill in males and females. Accid. Anal. Prev. 23(1), 45–52 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(91)90034-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the DFG-grants RI 1511/3-1 to JWR and LU 1880/3-1 to AT (both “Learning from Humans – Building for Humans”) and FR 2715/4-1 (“Integrated Socio-technical Models for Conflict Resolution and Causal Reasoning”) to MF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Trende .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Trende, A., Unni, A., Rieger, J., Fraenzle, M. (2021). Modelling Turning Intention in Unsignalized Intersections with Bayesian Networks. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2021 - Posters. HCII 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1421. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78645-8_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78645-8_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78644-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78645-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics