Skip to main content

Modeling Patient-Specific Periaortic Interactions with Static and Dynamic Structures Using a Moving Heterogeneous Elastic Foundation Boundary Condition

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart (FIMH 2021)

Abstract

Perivascular support and tethering are likely relevant factors in vascular mechanics and one of the possible causes of deformational heterogeneity of the aortic wall. Besides these effects, the thoracic aorta interacts with the heart and other moving tissues and organs. We propose a generalized approach to model the effect of aortic interactions with static and dynamic perivascular structures. Periaortic interactions are modeled as a heterogeneous Elastic Foundation Boundary Condition (EFBC). This is implemented in the Finite Element model as a collection of unidimensional springs attached to the adventitial surface and a movable opposite end. An optimization algorithm iterates over the material constants and EFBC parameters to fit the simulated nodal displacements or the aortic wall to patient-specific DENSE MRI-derived displacements. We hypothesize that the adventitial load distribution that replicates the in vivo motion and deformation of the aorta is representative of the actual periaortic interactions. We study 3 aortic locations: the distal aortic arch, the descending thoracic aorta, and the infrarenal abdominal aorta. Our method reproduced the in vivo DENSE MRI-derived displacements with a median error below 30% of the pixel-size resolution (1.2–1.6 mm). The resulting average adventitial load is circumferentially and axially heterogeneous and ranged between 30 and 60% of the luminal pressure-pulse depending on the local nature of the periaortic interaction. Adequate modeling of periaortic interactions may bring a better understanding of its role in the normal and pathological function of the aorta in vivo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wilson, J.S., Zhong, X., Hair, J., Robert Taylor, W., Oshinski, J.N.: In vivo quantification of regional circumferential green strain in the thoracic and abdominal aorta by two-dimensional spiral cine DENSE MRI. J. Biomech. Eng. 141(6) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040910

  2. Petterson, N.J., van Disseldorp, E.M.J., van Sambeek, M.R.H.M., van de Vosse, F.N., Lopata, R.G.P.: Including surrounding tissue improves ultrasound-based 3D mechanical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J. Biomech. 85, 126–133 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.01.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chirinos, J.A.: Arterial stiffness: basic concepts and measurement techniques. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 5(3), 243–255 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-012-9359-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferruzzi, J., Di Achille, P., Tellides, G., Humphrey, J.D.: Combining in vivo and in vitro biomechanical data reveals key roles of perivascular tethering in central artery function. PLoS ONE 13(9), (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, J., Peruski, B., Hunley, C., Kwon, S., Baek, S.: Influence of surrounding tissues on biomechanics of aortic wall. Int. J. Exp. Comput. Biomech. 2(2), 105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijecb.2013.056516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bracamonte, J.H., Wilson, J.S., Soares, J.S.: Assessing patient-specific mechanical properties of aortic wall and peri-aortic structures from in vivo dense MR imaging using an inverse finite element method and elastic foundation boundary conditions. J. Biomech. Eng. 142(12) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047721

  7. Wilson, J.S., Taylor, W.R., Oshinski, J.: Assessment of the regional distribution of normalized circumferential strain in the thoracic and abdominal aorta using DENSE cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 21(1), 59 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-019-0565-0

  8. Mihai, L.A., Goriely, A.: How to characterize a nonlinear elastic material? A review on nonlinear constitutive parameters in isotropic finite elasticity. Proc. R. Soc. A Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 473(2207) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2017.0607

  9. Holzapfel, G.A., Gasser, T.C., Ogden, R.W.: A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J. Elast. 61(1–3), 1–48 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010835316564

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Roccabianca, S., Figueroa, C.A., Tellides, G., Humphrey, J.D.: Quantification of regional differences in aortic stiffness in the aging human. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 29, 618–634 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maas, S.A., Ellis, B.J., Ateshian, G.A., Weiss, J.A.: FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics. J. Biomech. Eng. 134(1) (2012). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005694

  12. Labrosse, M.R., Gerson, E.R., Veinot, J.P., Beller, C.J.: Mechanical characterization of human aortas from pressurization testing and a paradigm shift for circumferential residual stress. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 17, 44–55 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, J., Baek, S.: Circumferential variations of mechanical behavior of the porcine thoracic aorta during the inflation test. J. Biomech. 44(10), 1941–1947 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joao S. Soares .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bracamonte, J., Wilson, J.S., Soares, J.S. (2021). Modeling Patient-Specific Periaortic Interactions with Static and Dynamic Structures Using a Moving Heterogeneous Elastic Foundation Boundary Condition. In: Ennis, D.B., Perotti, L.E., Wang, V.Y. (eds) Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart. FIMH 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12738. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78710-3_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78710-3_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78709-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78710-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics