Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop a conceptual model to improve the quality of supply chain management by adaptive and generative relationship learning to develop relationship flexibility, collaboration, and innovation. The method used is an in-depth literature study of relationship learning, flexibility, collaboration, and innovation in supply chain management. The results of this study are propositions formulated in the form of a conceptual model for improving the quality of supply chain management that can be developed for further research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hunt, S.D., Morgan, R.M.: The comparative advantage theory of competition. J. Mark. 59(2), 1 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/1252069
Bharadwaj, A.S.: A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(1), 169–193 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983
Lorenzoni, G., Lipparini, A.: The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study. Strateg. Manag. J. 20(4), 317–338 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199904)20:4%3c317:AID-SMJ28%3e3.0.CO;2-3
Day, G.S.: The capabilities of market-driven organizations. J. Mark. 58(4), 37 (1994). https://doi.org/10.2307/1251915
Helfert, G., Ritter, T., Walter, A.: Redefining market orientation from a relationship perspective. Eur. J. Mark. 36(9/10), 1119–1139 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560210437361
Siguaw, J.A., Simpson, P.M., Baker, T.L.: Effects of supplier market orientation on distributor market orientation and the channel relationship: The distributor perspective. J. Mark. 62(3), 99–111 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/1251746
Kohli, A.K., Jaworski, B.J.: Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. J. Mark. 54(2), 1 (1990). https://doi.org/10.2307/1251866
Baker, W.E., Sinkula, J.M.: The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses. J. Small Bus. Manag. 47(4), 443–464 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00278.x
Slater, S.F., Narver, J.C.: Market orientation and the learning organization. J. Mark. 59(3), 63 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/1252120
Worren, N., Moore, K., Cardona, P.: Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: a study of the home appliance industry. Strateg. Manag. J. 23(12), 1123–1140 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.276
O’Malley, L.: Relational marketing: development, debates and directions. J. Mark. Manag. 30(11–12), 1220–1238 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.939592
Yoganathan, D., Jebarajakirthy, C., Thaichon, P.: The influence of relationship marketing orientation on brand equity in banks. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 26, 14–22 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.05.006
Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Relationship’ in transition: an introduction to the special issue on relationship and service-dominant logic. J. Bus. Mark. Manag. 4(4), 167–168 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12087-010-0042-4
Möller, K., Halinen, A.: Relationship marketing theory: its roots and direction. J. Mark. Manag. 16(1–3), 29–54 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1362/026725700785100460
Edwards, C.J., Baker, B.L.: Relational marketing throughout the history of commercial exchange: blind spots in marketing’s origin story. J. Mark. Channels 26(3), 161–177 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/1046669x.2020.1757977
Jarratt, D.: Conceptualizing a relationship management capability. Mark. Theory 4(4), 287–309 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593104047637
Dyer, J.H., Singh, H.: The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(4), 660 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/259056
Selnes, F., Sallis, J.: Promoting relationship learning. J. Mark. 67(3), 80–95 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.3.80.18656
Baker, W.E., Sinkula, J.M.: The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 27(4), 411–427 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070399274002
Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A.: Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg. Manag. J. 21(10/11), 1105–1121 (2000). http://www.jstor.org/stable/3094429
Bouchra, A., Akram, E.K., Amine, B.M.: Flexibility and agility: evolution and relationship. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 29(7), 1138–1162 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0090
Macneil, I.R.: The new social contract: an inquiry into modern contractual relations. Mich. Law Rev. 79(4), 827 (1981). https://doi.org/10.2307/1288310
Lusch, R.F., Brown, J.R.: Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels. J. Mark. 60(4), 19–38 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000404
Weitz, B.A., Jap, S.D.: Relationship marketing and distribution channels. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 23(4), 305–320 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300411
Mohr, J.J., Fisher, R.J., Nevin, J.R.: Collaborative communication in interfirm relationships: moderating effects of integration and control. J. Mark. 60(3), 103–115 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/1251844
Tsai, K.H., Hsu, T.T.: Cross-functional collaboration, competitive intensity, knowledge integration mechanisms, and new product performance: a mediated moderation model. Ind. Mark. Manag. 43(2), 293–303 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.08.012
Jap, S.D.: Perspectives on joint competitive advantages in buyer-supplier relationships. Int. J. Res. Mark. 18(1–2), 19–35 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(01)00028-3
Welbourne, T.M., Pardo-del-Val, M.: Relational capital: strategic advantage for small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) through negotiation and collaboration. Gr. Decis. Negot. 18(5), 483–497 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9138-6
Jap, S.D.: Pie-expansion efforts: collaboration processes in buyer-supplier relationships. J. Mark. Res. 36(4), 461–475 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/3152000
Sharma, A., Tzokas, N., Saren, M., Kyziridis, P.: Antecedents and consequences of relationship marketing. Ind. Mark. Manag. 28(6), 601–611 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0019-8501(98)00034-0
Mavondo, F., Farrell, M.: Cultural orientation: its relationship with market orientation, innovation and organisational performance. Manag. Decis. 41(3), 241 (2003). http://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=10187216&site=eds-live
Deshpandé, R., Farley, J.U.: Understanding Market Orientation: A Prospectively Designed Meta-Analysis of Three Market Orientation Scales. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge (2012)
Jarratt, D., O’Neill, G.: The effect of organisational culture on business-to-business relationship management practice and performance. Australas. Mark. J. 10(3), 21–40 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1441-3582(02)70156-0
Anderson, J.C., Narus, J.A.: A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. J. Mark. 54(1), 42–58 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400103
Verona, G.: A resource-based view of product development. Acad. Manag. Rev. 24(1), 132 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/259041
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nurcholis, L., Adhiatma, A. (2021). Supply Chain Management Quality Improvement Model with Adaptive and Generative Relationship Learning. In: Barolli, L., Yim, K., Enokido, T. (eds) Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems. CISIS 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 278. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79725-6_57
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79725-6_57
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79724-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79725-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)