Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Supply Chain Management Quality Improvement Model with Adaptive and Generative Relationship Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 278))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1199 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a conceptual model to improve the quality of supply chain management by adaptive and generative relationship learning to develop relationship flexibility, collaboration, and innovation. The method used is an in-depth literature study of relationship learning, flexibility, collaboration, and innovation in supply chain management. The results of this study are propositions formulated in the form of a conceptual model for improving the quality of supply chain management that can be developed for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hunt, S.D., Morgan, R.M.: The comparative advantage theory of competition. J. Mark. 59(2), 1 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/1252069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bharadwaj, A.S.: A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(1), 169–193 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lorenzoni, G., Lipparini, A.: The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study. Strateg. Manag. J. 20(4), 317–338 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199904)20:4%3c317:AID-SMJ28%3e3.0.CO;2-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Day, G.S.: The capabilities of market-driven organizations. J. Mark. 58(4), 37 (1994). https://doi.org/10.2307/1251915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Helfert, G., Ritter, T., Walter, A.: Redefining market orientation from a relationship perspective. Eur. J. Mark. 36(9/10), 1119–1139 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560210437361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Siguaw, J.A., Simpson, P.M., Baker, T.L.: Effects of supplier market orientation on distributor market orientation and the channel relationship: The distributor perspective. J. Mark. 62(3), 99–111 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/1251746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kohli, A.K., Jaworski, B.J.: Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. J. Mark. 54(2), 1 (1990). https://doi.org/10.2307/1251866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baker, W.E., Sinkula, J.M.: The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses. J. Small Bus. Manag. 47(4), 443–464 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00278.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Slater, S.F., Narver, J.C.: Market orientation and the learning organization. J. Mark. 59(3), 63 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/1252120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Worren, N., Moore, K., Cardona, P.: Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: a study of the home appliance industry. Strateg. Manag. J. 23(12), 1123–1140 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Malley, L.: Relational marketing: development, debates and directions. J. Mark. Manag. 30(11–12), 1220–1238 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.939592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoganathan, D., Jebarajakirthy, C., Thaichon, P.: The influence of relationship marketing orientation on brand equity in banks. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 26, 14–22 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Relationship’ in transition: an introduction to the special issue on relationship and service-dominant logic. J. Bus. Mark. Manag. 4(4), 167–168 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12087-010-0042-4

  14. Möller, K., Halinen, A.: Relationship marketing theory: its roots and direction. J. Mark. Manag. 16(1–3), 29–54 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1362/026725700785100460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards, C.J., Baker, B.L.: Relational marketing throughout the history of commercial exchange: blind spots in marketing’s origin story. J. Mark. Channels 26(3), 161–177 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/1046669x.2020.1757977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jarratt, D.: Conceptualizing a relationship management capability. Mark. Theory 4(4), 287–309 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593104047637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dyer, J.H., Singh, H.: The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(4), 660 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/259056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Selnes, F., Sallis, J.: Promoting relationship learning. J. Mark. 67(3), 80–95 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.3.80.18656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baker, W.E., Sinkula, J.M.: The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 27(4), 411–427 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070399274002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A.: Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg. Manag. J. 21(10/11), 1105–1121 (2000). http://www.jstor.org/stable/3094429

  21. Bouchra, A., Akram, E.K., Amine, B.M.: Flexibility and agility: evolution and relationship. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 29(7), 1138–1162 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Macneil, I.R.: The new social contract: an inquiry into modern contractual relations. Mich. Law Rev. 79(4), 827 (1981). https://doi.org/10.2307/1288310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lusch, R.F., Brown, J.R.: Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels. J. Mark. 60(4), 19–38 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Weitz, B.A., Jap, S.D.: Relationship marketing and distribution channels. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 23(4), 305–320 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mohr, J.J., Fisher, R.J., Nevin, J.R.: Collaborative communication in interfirm relationships: moderating effects of integration and control. J. Mark. 60(3), 103–115 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/1251844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsai, K.H., Hsu, T.T.: Cross-functional collaboration, competitive intensity, knowledge integration mechanisms, and new product performance: a mediated moderation model. Ind. Mark. Manag. 43(2), 293–303 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jap, S.D.: Perspectives on joint competitive advantages in buyer-supplier relationships. Int. J. Res. Mark. 18(1–2), 19–35 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(01)00028-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Welbourne, T.M., Pardo-del-Val, M.: Relational capital: strategic advantage for small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) through negotiation and collaboration. Gr. Decis. Negot. 18(5), 483–497 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9138-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jap, S.D.: Pie-expansion efforts: collaboration processes in buyer-supplier relationships. J. Mark. Res. 36(4), 461–475 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/3152000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharma, A., Tzokas, N., Saren, M., Kyziridis, P.: Antecedents and consequences of relationship marketing. Ind. Mark. Manag. 28(6), 601–611 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0019-8501(98)00034-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mavondo, F., Farrell, M.: Cultural orientation: its relationship with market orientation, innovation and organisational performance. Manag. Decis. 41(3), 241 (2003). http://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=10187216&site=eds-live

  32. Deshpandé, R., Farley, J.U.: Understanding Market Orientation: A Prospectively Designed Meta-Analysis of Three Market Orientation Scales. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jarratt, D., O’Neill, G.: The effect of organisational culture on business-to-business relationship management practice and performance. Australas. Mark. J. 10(3), 21–40 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1441-3582(02)70156-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Anderson, J.C., Narus, J.A.: A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. J. Mark. 54(1), 42–58 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Verona, G.: A resource-based view of product development. Acad. Manag. Rev. 24(1), 132 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/259041

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economic, Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia

    Lutfi Nurcholis & Ardian Adhiatma

Authors
  1. Lutfi Nurcholis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ardian Adhiatma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lutfi Nurcholis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Fukuoka, Japan

    Leonard Barolli

  2. Department of Information Security Engineering, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Korea (Republic of)

    Kangbin Yim

  3. Faculty of Bussiness Administration, Rissho University, Tokyo, Japan

    Tomoya Enokido

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nurcholis, L., Adhiatma, A. (2021). Supply Chain Management Quality Improvement Model with Adaptive and Generative Relationship Learning. In: Barolli, L., Yim, K., Enokido, T. (eds) Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems. CISIS 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 278. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79725-6_57

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation