Skip to main content

On Context Frames and Their Implementations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Modeling and Software Design (BMSD 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 422))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

When an actor is selecting an action in order to fulfill its intents, in a given context, the actor’s knowledge and beliefs about the specific context will impact the possibility to achieve a desired outcome. The context is often affected by unobserved, or unmeasured, factors, which can impact the result of the desired outcome.

The context specific knowledge and beliefs an actor has about a domain, together with the possibilities to evaluate and learn which actions shall be taken, are packaged into a context frame. Our intention with this study is to evaluate an implementation of such a context frame. The context frame concept is meant to support actors to fulfill their intents in a given knowledge domain, by enforcing the needed, and available, actions which cause effects on the outcomes. We have built our implementation of the context frame on the OODA-loop, Pask’s conversation theory, and structural causal models, by using a Bayesian approach, and probabilistic programming.

The research approach is based on evaluation research. We evaluated our implementation with the help of a proof of concept. During the proof of concept we used data sets containing decisions about treatment and survival analysis regarding cancer patients, information obtained during focus group interviews, and questionnaire data.

The proof of concept used to evaluate our implementation of a context frame was regarded as successful and the concept of context frames deemed as useful.

Our division of a context frame in three parts, supported by four different types of analysis functions, made it easier to create a solution which supports evaluation and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anthony, K.D.: Introduction to causal modeling, bayesian theory and major Bayesian modeling tools for the intelligence analyst. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1–31 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Consoli, A., Tweedale, J., Jain, L.: Aligning cognitive models using AC3M. In: Proceedings - 1st International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology, ICETET 2008, pp. 882–886 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crown, W.H.: Real-world evidence, causal inference, and machine learning. Value Health 22(5), 587–592 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davidson-Pilon, C.: Bayesian Methods for Hackers, 1st edn. Addison Wesley Data & Analytics Series (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hayduk, L.A., et al.: Pearl’s d-separation: one more step into causal thinking. Struct. Equ. Model. 10(2), 289–311 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hernan, M.A., Robins, J.M.: Causal Inference: What if. CRC Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kline, R.B.: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th edn. The Guilford Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kochenderfer, M.: Decision Making Under Uncertainty. MIT Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, B.: Lifelong machine learning: a paradigm for continuous learning. Front. Comput. Sci. 11(3), 359–361 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mccauley-bell, P., Freeman, R.: Quantification of belief and knowledge systems in information warfare. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE international conference on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 3, pp. 1579–1585 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McElreath, R.: Statistical Rethinking. CRC Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McElreath, R.: Rethinking package (2017). https://github.com/rmcelreath/rethinking. Accessed 09 Dec 2020

  13. Pask, G.: Conversation Theory. Elsevier, The Netherlands (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pearl, J.: Causality, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pearl, J., Glymour, M., Jewell, N.P.: Causal Inference in Statistics, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richards, C.: Boyd’s OODA loop. In: Proceedings of Lean Software and Systems Conference 2011, 127–136 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robson, C.: Real World Research: A Resource for Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Silvander, J.: Understanding human generated decision data. In: Shishkov, B. (ed.) BMSD 2020. Understanding Human Generated Decision Data, vol. 391, pp. 362–374. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52306-0_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Silvander, J., Angelin, L.: Introducing intents to the OODA loop. In: Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems, pp. 878–883 (2019). Procedia Computer Science

    Google Scholar 

  20. Silvander, J., Wilson, M., Wnuk, K., Svahnberg, M.: Supporting continuous changes to business intents. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 27(8), 1167–1198 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Silvander, J., Wnuk, K., Svahnberg, M.: Systematic literature review on intent-driven systems. IET Softw. 14(4), 345–357 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Simmons, E.: Requirements triage: what can we learn from a “medical approach? IEEE Softw. 21(4), 86–88 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Textor, J., van der Zander, B., Gilthorpe, M.S., Liśkiewicz, M., Ellison, G.T.: Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package ‘dagitty’. Int. J. Epidemiol. 45(6), 1887–1894 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vaughan, D.: Analytic Skills for AI & Data Science. O’Reilly Media Inc (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wikipedia: C-reactive protein (2018). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-reactive_protein. Accessed 01 Apr 2021

  26. Wikipedia: Johari window (2020). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johari_window. Accessed 30 Nov 2020

  27. Yao, L., Chu, Z., Li, S., Li, Y., Gao, J., Zhang, A.: A survey on causal inference. arXiv 1(1), 1–38 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zrake, J., MacFadyen, A., McEnery, J.E., Racusin, J.L., Gehrels, N.: Numerical simulations of driven supersonic relativistic MHD turbulence. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 22, 102–105 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

To Anna for her patience, endurance, and thoughts, when forcing us to explain our ideas to her, and ourselves, in an understandable way.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan Silvander .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Silvander, J. (2021). On Context Frames and Their Implementations. In: Shishkov, B. (eds) Business Modeling and Software Design. BMSD 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 422. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79976-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79976-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79975-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79976-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics